Civil Cases

If the fruit falls onto your side, I believe it would be yours.

However, though some localities say a homeowner can cut overhanging branches IF the cutting does not deface the tree, it is MUCH more neighborly to work out the problem with your neighbor. No point in hurting a tree, especially one old enough to produce fruit.

Yes, this is a common answer that is served in these complaints. This would be an acceptable answer for eviction.

The guy is dead, suing him will be a waste of time and money. The best thing is to make his mistake known publicly, so other doctors and individuals will learn from that doctor's mistake.

Yes. There is no minimum amount you can sue for in small claims court.

Writ of attachment is a legal document which court after exam the evidence and determine it is necessary to issue this order because the person or property are in immediate danger. But if it is ex parte the other part abuse the system. In many occasion iy is unnecessary. Specially for child custody.

The protection offered by an LLC depends on many factors. First, where are you establishing the company? Second, is the LLC adequately capitalized (does it have its own assets to operate, or is it just a front for an individual). Do the officers and directors of the LLC follow the requirements of their state in terms of management of the LLC: do they hold regular meetings of the board, with minutes and votes as required? An LLC without the assets and formalities may not provide any protection to its owners at all. Property capitalized and run, however, an LLC can protect its owners from personal liability for those debts of the company (again, varies by state).

Basically it means that there is no set amount of money attributed to the 'injury/harm' done to the plaintiff. Whereas pecuniary would indicate a specified amount of money has been set by the existing law relating to the offense.

No. Whoever files first is the Plaintiff. If the Defendant then chooses to "cross-sue", the Defendant will still be the defendant on the pleadings even though by virtue thereof, the defendant has launched what is called a counter-claim. In such a scenario, the Defendant will have to defend the Plaintiff's claim, and progress the counter-claim ---- in the same way the plaintiff will need to progress its claim as Plaintiff (and yes, in the same way, the Plaintiff will have to defend the counter-claim launched by the Defendant).

By way of additional info, note that the "whoever files first" rule is generally applied to "fix" jurisdiction too. Although the general rule is that the Defendant should be sued in its own jurisdiction, rules modify this basic approach, most often by way of the applicable treaty (e.g. by "special jurisdiction" and "exclusive jurisdiction") and thus by such rules, often the plaintiff is able to sue in its own jurisdiction. Therefore if both potential parties believe they have a claim against the other, where the rules allow for the jurisdiction to be in the plaintiff's own, then it works on a "first come first served basis.

No. The consequence of ignoring a court order is the issuance of an arrest warrant. She should consult an attorney.

No. The consequence of ignoring a court order is the issuance of an arrest warrant. She should consult an attorney.

No. The consequence of ignoring a court order is the issuance of an arrest warrant. She should consult an attorney.

No. The consequence of ignoring a court order is the issuance of an arrest warrant. She should consult an attorney.

If it's serious or you feel threatened, call the police and they will help you. If not, depending on your country's legal system you can file a restraining order. Call a local lawyer and ask how it's done.

To press criminal charges against someone, go to the police station that is closest to where the criminal act occurred.

This question is filed under "civil" cases. Charges are not "pressed" in civil matters.

Could be a default judgment for the other party.

look up casenet.com under litigants, you should find what you are looking for, or you can call the courthouse that gave the judgment they would have that information.

The attorney's firms representing the class action will mail it to you. Don't hold your breath expecting a large check.

when you are an invited guest you have aquired many rights as if the property is yours. you are allowed to make decissions that would protect the property or the persons on it. if you are invited and harmed intentionally this is premeditated with intent which becomes a serious felony. to learn more look for the book "YOU and the LAW" by Readers Digest. Very helpfull book I promise!

No. There is no immediate action for not taking advocates legal notice but there is every possibility legal proceedings may be initiated against you in the appropriate court of law.

Yes, do a search under The Hinkley Case and you should find it. The actual Chromium leakage is STILL going on in the town of Hinkley and surrounding areas. You can find that information on the CA.gov website under Hinkley. For more information, see the page link, further down this page, listed under Sources and Related Links.

You cannot supeona them, you will have to either get a search warrant or a court order.

cut-off for filing motion to quash subpoena?

the final arguments of opposing attorneys before a case goes to the jury.

Depends on the type of case. In some cases the defense can argue that as the victim doesn't wish to turn up they are therefore forfeting the case. In other cases the police may choose to take the case to court even without the victim if there is sufficent evidence to do so.

Generally, progressive summation is the process of obtaining a cumulative sum at any time by adding together all prior occurrences.

A system of government by groups or officals?

Your State Court or Federal court have jurisdiction to hear the case of medical negligence.