Civil Rights

Interrogatories, Requests for admissions, production of documents & depostions

UAE, Vatican City, Brunei, and Saudi Arabia

No. As long as the complaint sets forth sufficient allegations of fact to support a finding that the debt is due and owing the case moves along to the point of discovery. The whole purpose of discovery, and therefore a motion to compel discovery when discovery is refused, is to ascertain the facts supporting the allegations that the debt is due and owing. Another point is that discovery is a process that takes place prior to the trial and the trial is where plaintiff proves its case. Therefore, a motion to compel discovery necessarily precedes proof of the debt.

The 4th amendment does extend to automobiles. No Police Officer or Government official may seize any property from a persons property unless you're under arrest for a crime involving that said vehicle or they have a warrant for that said vehicle.

I do not give any orders that say you must pay the costs of anonymous (X).

If the father wants to be involved in the child's life, the mother cannot legally stop him on her own. Only a judge may determine if the father is unfit to be a parent, but even then the court may still order visitations. If you believe that the child is in immediate danger from the father, call the police.

He refused to give civil rights to any African Americans.

If you have not yet registered the fire arm they could take it. They can do this because since you have not registered the fire arm it is illegal.

If that is not the case then when and if they handed you paperwork when they came into your house did it state why they were there.

Hello. Thank you for replying! Actually they did not show my father any paper work at all, matter of fact they were not going to even give my father any type of documentation of proof they seized it. My father had to tell them, well no one is leaving with that fire arm with out either me getting all necessary record of so, or your supervisor here leaving with it on camera, and pointed to surveillance they did not even know was there. one officer said sorry, then once the supervisor and camera came in the picture my father said they folded like 7/2 off suit, wrote out the receipt after lying about it all, and left. They were only supposed to check that the vins matched to confirm the original owners claims, and to confirm I indeed had it. they lied.

You must look at the city/county ordinance to find out. They are all different.

Constitutions, particularly the US Constitution, are the bulwarks that protect citizens against the intrusion of government. They establish mechanisms by which representative forms of government are created and operate, as well as court systems.

you gtotta beat off

The charge is the same whether it's your first offense or your fifth offense.

If will be some type of Larceny offense. Possibly 'Embezzlement,' if the money order's were actually entrusted to you by trust.

First you should file a report with your local police department. Theft falls under criminal law, not civil law, so to press charges you would need to go through law enforcement channels, not civil court.

T.E.A.M Together Everyone Achieves More

There is no 'I' in team. It is a general law of nature that when we freely give we freely receive. By not empowering workers, you are not maximizing on the benefits available through utilizing creative minds of workers. These individuals could be full of ideas and potential that may turn into valuable profitability for an organization. In fact, not empowering workers is dangerous because workers feel suppressed and eventually become angry, and do things to sabotage profitability for business.

At the very least, therefore, workers should be empowered so they do not purposely create obstacles to corporate profitability.

The world would be no better off without guns, just people who use them and do not take the privilege seriously and hurt someone who leave it unlocked. There are so many weapons besides guns…knives that cause just as horrific results. The world would be better off if it just lived in Peace with one another and learned Maslows hierarchy of needs instead of all the religious dogma that appears to only work on Sundays.

Then someone else is and must follow the wishes of the deceased.

It shouldn't! How many chances do you want to have to stupidly kill or maim another person. Maybe we ought to also have 2nd Chance Homicide laws too. Sheesh!

Very unlikely, most(all?) states only allow the expungement of one felony offense per lifetime.

That question is moot, because homosexuality cannot be from a completely genetic cause. In studies done on identical twins, only half of the other twins of gay men were homosexual. If homosexuality were completely genetic, then all of the twins would have been homosexual.

Besides, genetic predispositions are not protected in the Constitution.

The Americans with Disabilities act

Not only is it legal, it is common practice. It is even common practice to put an "undercover" law enforcement officer in a cell, masquerading as in inmate to gain more information.

If however the inmate requests to not speak without his lawyer present, anything gained after that point is potentially "Fruit of the poison tree."

Lost property is often turned over to the police department. Its very common for a citizen to hand over a knapsack, or wallet, or a cell phone.

When property of value is turned over, there are three possible choices for the officer:

1. Throw it out. This is not really an "official" or Police approved method of dealing with found property, but if someone turns over a used sock, well its garbage. You aren't going to catalogue it or look for its owner. The value of the item will be taken into consideration. And trust me, you would be surprised what some citizens would try to turn over....

2. Catalogue it and file the found property report. It's a report commenting on the specifics of the item, the finder and the location/time it was found. It gets stored until the rightful owner claims it, or a predetermined time passes.

3. Return it to the owner. Now, how would an officer do this? Well, he would have to look through the item.

In answer to your specific question, an officer is doing his job when he is looking through a lost phone. He is attempting to find some kind of identifier to establish the owner. The officer may even start calling people in the contact list of the phone. If during this point he uncovers some information of a sensitive nature, or of criminal nature, he has been doing his job in good faith. Any investigation that is started through this incident is legitimate, and fault cannot be placed on the officer.

In looking to the owner's information, the police officer finds something that MAY be criminal, that information CANNOT be used as evidence against the accused because the information was obtained from the accused personal property without his consent.

------------------------------------------------

Not sure when this answer was last improved, but, in US v. FLORES-LOPEZ, the Seventh Crcuit Court of Appeals, ruled that Warrantless Searches of cell phones is permitted. -- Demsd