Totalitarianism

To have a totalitarian regime the leader of the contry must have complete control of everything in the country with no one else having any power.

Italian Mussolini aimed to make Italy totalitarian but this failed because power still existed with the elites of Italian society which include:

The Catholic Church because of their independent state that Mussolini gave to them so thir Catholic party leaves Italy's parliament.

The industrialists and landowners kept control of their possessions of land and factories under Mussolinis regime.

Well, I rather prefer the "Hen-pecked momma's boy" leadership style, at least if you are referring to my bosses' leadership style.

He had sole control over Germany's government

ahdhsjhhjhggbfgg

It means exercising control over the freedom, will, or thought of others. Synonyms are authoritarian, autocratic, dictatorial, or tyrannical.

helping matter is unsastainable

Answer this question…

Religious beliefs were forbidden, and religious organizations were shut down.

Dictators

Just saying hi

They were at that level before the war.

Capitalism

Germany (Adolf Hitler). Italy ( Benito Mussolini)

1922

There can be no such thing as a Socialist economic system. Socialism has no money or wages or prices, hence no economics. Nor does it have any government. Socialism has no classes or government, just people co-operating for the common good.

Ideology has no place under authoritarian rule. This is because it involved thinking. This is looked down upon under such occurrence.

Afghanistan, Cuba, North Korea, Laos and Vietnam.

giving the government the power to ignore the constitution for four years [it's on my history paper so it's correct]

writers who encourage independent thinking

There can be no such things as a Communist dictator. Communism is a classless stateless society based on production for use and democratic control.

Lenin, Trotsky, Sverdlov, and Stalin began this process in the late summer of 1917 before their "October 1917 revolution", but it was not completed until the 1920s after Stalin took over following Lenin's death.

There is no meaningful code of ethics when doing business with a totalitarian government, because it is in itself unethical to do so. When google and yahoo assisted the Chinese government in censoring the internet and identifying(and imprisoning) political dissidents, they were publicly condemned for a while,and accused of being unamerican, and then it was business as usual.It was a bit like a showtrial. Everybody knew that the Chinese IT market was far too lucrative to let ethics get in the way. The executives at google and yahoo are not necessarily immoral people, but are obligated to look after shareholders and had little choice but to do as the Chinese said.It may be unethical to do business with dictators, but it's also profitable. Citizens in a democracy don't tolerate their recources being pillaged and their environment polluted by foreign corporations, and that's why dictators are helped into power by western governments, and kept there with a steady supply of arms. Most people are against human rights abuses, but many of the same people have money invested in companies dealing with repressive governments, either as direct shares or indirectly as pension funds.