Intel Microprocessors

Itanic is a nickname that was coined for referring to Itanium. It is meant to denote the ship that sank Titanic. This is due to the failure of IA-64 that led to a heavy loss born by HP.

please hurry because i need it for something dire. kthx! :C
mike@acit. :D

pleaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaase! :D

i found out that it can be used like that but, it depends on what your running

example I have this old game called fighters Anthology

I used to have destop

ran at 2.8ghz or 2,800mhz when I played my game on this P4 single CPU it ran at 2,548mhz

or 91% when I played on my HP laptop Dv7

T6400 just like yours

I got differnt look at it winows says my game runs at 60% of the total cpu power of T6400 of 4Ghz

60% is 2,400 but split 1200 each

NOW BF3 plays at

98% of T6400 or 3,9GHZ of 4GHZ

Any computer that uses a 64 bit word length for memory and/or registers. It can be any specific machine architecture: Intel x86, PowerPC, Arm, Cray supercomputers, DEC VAX, DEC Alpha, IBM Z-series, etc. The important thing is that it process data in 64 bit words.

Charles Babbage invented the computer

Several people came up with various ideas for automatic computing devices at various times and working on different tasks, all were motivated by the common problem of having to do massive amounts of computations that were painfully tedious to do without error. The final result of this quest is the modern computer.

The 8051 is a microcontroller, not a microprocessor. To add or subtract, use the ADD or SUBB opcodes.

in 8085 only one accumulator used where in 6800 used two accumulator.

You can run and install the latest software and games faster and less waiting, another benefit is you can run more things at once without your computer freakin out, I5 is a great choice, don't waste money on that I7, unless moneys not an issue. Take care

If you are into video games, I would suggest some variant of DOS, such as MS-DOS or FreeDOS. If you want to use the computer as a desktop, I would recommend Damn Small Linux. If you want to run simple Windows-based programs, Windows NT 4 would be a fairly stable (though no longer secure) choice.

difference between dual core and core i3

What developments have been most significant to the processor and why?

A wafer is a thin, light biscuit or cookie, a piece of unleavened bread, or a soft disc made from flour.

Goto start -> Run and type winmsd.exe. This will bring up system info page. If the string next to Processor is x86, its a 32 bit machine . If the string next to processor is ia64 or AMD64 then its a 64 bit machine.

Source: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/827218

cheers,

Esha

Lda 8500

mov c,a

cpi 02h

jz l1

cpi 01h

jz l1

mvi e,01h

mvi h,00

mvi b,02h

l4: mvi d,00

mov a,c

l2: sub b

inr d

cmp b

jnc l2

cmp e

jz l3

jnc l3

inr h

l3:inr b

dcr d

jnz l4

mov a,h

cmp e

jz l5

jnc l5

mov a,01

sta 8501

hlt

l5: mov a,0e

sta 8501

hlt

The 8085 has five interrupts, INTR, RST5.5, RST6.5, RST7.5, and TRAP. It also has eight software interrupts, RST0, RST1, ..., RST7.

The INTR interrupt requires a hardware response that is an opcode. Usually, the opcode is either a CALL instruction, in which case the interrupt vector can go anywhere in memory, or it is an RST instruction, in which case the vector is based on a table in low memory.

In the case of RST instructions, either directly or via INTR, or the RSTx.5 interrupts, you simply multiply the interrupt number by 8 to get the vector address. The following table presents the vector addresses for all possible interrupts...

RST 0 - 00H

RST 1 - 08H

RST 2 - 10H

RST 3 - 18H

RST 4 - 20H

TRAP - 24H

RST 5 - 28H

RST5.5 - 2CH

RST 6 - 30H

RST 6.5 - 34H

RST 7 - 38H

RST 7.5 - 3CH

Bus Clock is based on the System Clock. In other terms Bus Clock is derived from system Clock. Bus Clock is usually half System Clock. (Busy Clock = System Clock / 2)

In PIC Microcontroller , During the Fatching of instruction no. 1

it needs of one clock cycle, then after for the exicution of instruction no. 1 it reqires one extra clock cycle , but at the same time it fatches inst. no. 2 . Similarly, during the execution time of inst. no. 2 , it fatches inst. no. 3 and so on.

In other words we can say that, PIC Microcontroller requires 2 clock cycle at starting the after it requires only one clock pulse. In this way we can say that instruction pipelining is done in PIC microcontroller.

That will depend on the degree of the damage to the fins.

If some of the fins are slightly bent there should be no problem at all.

On the other hand if several of the fins are broken off the cooling will probably not be adequate,

Is the microprocessor's internal temperature sensor reporting an unusually high temperature (this is the easiest way to tell if cooling is working right or not)?

processors Processor: 128-bit "Emotion Engine" Processor clock speed: 300 MHz Floating point unit (FPU) co-processor operating at 6.2 gigaflops Bus speed: 3.2 GB per second Original Play Station CPU core as I/O processor Graphics: "Graphics Synthesizer" 150 MHz Embedded cache 4 MB VRAM Resolution: 640x480 or 320x240 interlaced Colors: 24-bit (16,777,216) maximum, as well as 16-bit (65,536) mode Geometry engine: Alpha channel Anti-aliasing Bezier surfacing Gouraud shading Mip mapping Perspective correction Z-buffer Polygon rendering: 75 million polygons per second Audio: SPU2 (+CPU) Channels: 48 Sample rate: 44.1 KHz or 48 KHz Memory: 2 MB RAM Optical digital output Memory: 32 MB RDRAM Operating system: Proprietary Sony Game medium: Proprietary 4.7-GB DVD Supports original PlayStation CDs Video DVD support Audio CD support Drive bay (for hard disk or network interface) Other features: Two memory card slots Two USB ports FireWire port (called iLink by Sony)

I've tried both. I would say that Zinsser Watertite is superior to UGL Drylok.

Here's why: 1.) The Zinsser has a smoother finish...so it doesn't collect dirt as easy. And if it does, it wipes off easily. 2.) Drylok (latex, as I've never tried the oil), seemed to "yellow" as it aged. The Zinsser stayed white. 3.) The Zinsser stayed on incredibly well. Keep in mind, that surface prep is important. You don't want to put it on a dirt or dusty surface.

It starts with the 4004 chipset (4 bit) and 8008 microprocessor (8 bit).

The successor of the 4004 was the 4040, but this architecture was a dead end.

The successors of the 8008 were the 8080, 8085, 8086, 8088, 80186, 80286, 80386, 80486, Pentium, etc. including the current multicore microprocessors.

IBM chose to base their PC on the 8086 and 8088, then as successive newer microprocessors were developed new versions of the IBM PC used those microprocessors.

Intel also produced many specialized microprocessors and microcontrollers including some RISC microprocessors (e.g. i860, i960).

Current Apple Macintosh computers also use the latest Intel multicore microprocessors.

To judge a processor as "bad", you have to ignore their performance relative to the newest ones on the market. Processors improve all the time, so just because one is older, slower, and lacks as many features as newer ones does not make the older one necessarily bad, just obsolete:

The worst processor in terms of quality control was probably the earliest editions of the original Pentium processor. These processors contained two infamous bugs. One was the f00f bug, which was a faulty instruction that could easily cause the processor to crash under normal operation. The second is known as the FDIV bug, which caused significant (though statistically uncommon) errors in floating point calculations. Intel replaced these processors free of charge for the lifetime of the processor, and the flaw was quickly fixed.

All VIA C3 processors offered performance less than half of that of a Pentium III at the same clock rate. The VIA C3 was meant to compete on power efficiency and heat output, not performance, so this may not be an important failing.

Later models of the Pentium 4 had a performance equivalent of an AMD processor with 2/3 the clock rate. Basically, the Pentium 4 needed an extra GHz to match an AMD Athlon 64 in performance.

There are Celeron dual core processors today. However, just because you have Celeron processor, it does not mean your Celeron processor is a dual core processor. The easiest way to tell is to look at the Intel sticker on your computer. If it says "Dual Core," then it is dual core. If it does NOT say "Dual Core," then it is not dual core.