Nationalism

Nationalism was (and has always been) a very important part of unify a nations populace for a common goal or agenda. This can be scene in the likes of Nazi Germany in a negative use or in India during the 20th century during the time of Gandhi.

Nationalism or instilling in a people a sense of national pride or identity would have been especially useful during the 19th century because of the expansion of many of the European powers, and their imperialism.

Chiang Kai-shek.
The leader of China's nationalist party was CHIANG KAI-SHEK.

Nations should be formed by people who share the same language and ethnicity

First of all, sweetheart, Nazi Germany never had Zionist policies.

There has been a continuous Jewish population in Israel for a little over 3,000 years

now, although there have been times when their numbers dropped very low.

The modern migration of Jews back to Israel began sometime late in the 19th Century

(that was the 18 hundreds). That was the time when the individual Jews and the small

communities of Jews, who always knew that they weren't actually welcome anywhere,

began to share that realization with each other. If there were any who hadn't actually

realized it yet, it was hard for them to miss the way that as soon as things began to go

bad for this country or that one or the other one, there were always loud voices high up

in that country who blamed all of the country's problems on the Jews who lived there.

So the idea began to take hold among the Jews that it might actually be possible to start

rebuilding Jewish culture and society in the place where they always belonged, in Israel.

As Czarist Russia was falling apart and things were going from bad to worse for

Russian Jews, many of those who were able to leave Russia did so. My grandparents

went to Argentina and to the US. Many other Russian Jews went to Israel. As Germany

was going downhill in the 1920s and 30s and blaming it on the Jews, great numbers of

Jews continued to ignore what was happening and believe that it would get better.

Great numbers of other Jews who were able to leave Germany did that, and migrated

to many other countries around the world, including Israel. By the time the Nazis had

solidified power and created their policies specifically aimed at Jews, in the late 1930s,

Jews were no longer allowed to come and go as they felt like it. "Zionist" policy is a

policy that says Jews should be able to establish a Jewish nation in Israel. That was

not the policy of Nazi Germany. The policy of Nazi Germany said that Jews are inferior

human beings, that it is Germany's job to clean them off of the Earth, and that special

railroad lines and death camps should be built to do the job. And that's exactly what

Germany did, from 1938 until 1945, capturing and killing millions of Jews (and others)

in Germany, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, France, and Holland. After Germany lost the

Second World War in 1945, most of the Jews who were still alive in those countries

left, and went to other places. A lot of them went to Israel. Israel became a country

in 1948, and since that time, there have been migrations to Israel of Jews from many

countries, including large numbers from Russia, from Ethiopia, from Yemen, and from

the US and Canada.

In 1937, Ze'ev Jabotinsky proposed a mass exodus of Polish Jews to Mandatory

Palestine, but before he could pitch the idea to the Polish Jewish communities

(3.3 million people ... of whom 3 million would be mass-murdered), the British

opposed the entry of any Polish Jews into Mandatory Palestine fearing Arab

reprisals. If you wish to specifically discuss immigration to Mandatory Palestine

during the height of the Holocaust (1939-1945) you should note that the British

White Paper of 1939 further minimized the legal Jewish immigration to a trickle.

This widely prevented Jews from settling in Mandatory Palestine until after 1948

when the State of Israel was declared and opened its borders.

ITALY

False OW

A strong central government

because vicente ibarra

"The Great Depression in the United States, which triggered a worldwide depression marked by inflation and widespread poverty" and "competition among European powers to accelerate their economies, which led to large-scale industrialization" are the events that accelerated the rise of aggressive nationalism in Europe after World War I. The correct options are the option "A" and option "C".

A nation-state is a particular typology of state where political institutions are made for, used by, and maintained by a particular 'nation', or group of people with common political aspirations and usually sharing a common biological or cultural background.

Arab Nationalism rose to prominence with the weakening and defeat of the (non-Arab) Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century and declined after the defeat of the Arab armies in the Six Day War.

Policy of Aggression basically means the Treaty of Versailles. The countries who followed it Britain ,France and Germany.

If they come from Britain and/or have a British passport.

Nationalism can be dangerous because it can inspire passionate radicalism and violence in defense of the nation-state in question. A perfect example of the passionate violence that was inspired by nationalism were the Yugoslav Break-Up Wars, where Croats, Serbs, and Bosniaks engaged in very bloody wars based on nationalist concerns.

Nationalism has often fueled genocide by promoting the idea of a singular national identity, which can marginalize or dehumanize minority groups. When a dominant national group perceives others as threats to their cultural or political integrity, it can lead to violent attempts to eliminate those groups, as seen in historical events like the Holocaust and the Rwandan Genocide. Additionally, nationalist rhetoric can incite hatred and justify atrocities, as leaders manipulate national pride to rally support for violent actions against perceived enemies. Ultimately, nationalism can create an environment where genocidal actions are seen as a means of preserving or purifying the nation.

Nationalism does have a positive effect on the country's pride. So long as it does not morph into fascism, nationalism is a great way to express national pride and honor.

Popular music (Billboard hits) are not a good example of musical nationalism.

boa

Gandhian era marked an impeccable period in the indian national movement , which gave an inspiration for the people to get the freedom.

Mahatma with his new forms of struggle like ahimsa , satyagraha , and non cooperation almost shook base of the imperial british. He consolidated india as a nation , with his outstanding oratory skills he sparked the minds of each and every indian including men , women ,and youth . With his efforts national movement had reached to the grass root level and became a mass movement. National movement has been speed up and many movements with a large scale participation through out india, like ncm , cdm , qim became a reality.

Finally we got the independence in 1947.later this mode of struggle got the world reputation , and became modal for many national movements through the world.

Depends on three factors.

If the religion is true.

If the people are true.

If the nationalism is true.

From the Christian perspective, God said He would avenge His children speedily.

That can only be good for a nation, and nationalism in general; but not just any old nationalism. Just, good honest genuine care of what is for the good of your nation.

On the other hand; were a religion false, then that is not good.

In fact; it could get you and the whole country; blown to smithereens.

If the religion is true, but the people are not; then that too is bad.

God is not going to avenge an unrighteous nation, no sir.

to a greater out look, both colonialists and nationalist historians are prisoners of their time as they wrote their history being governed by the ruling elite governmentof their time, their history was so limited and mainly designed to promote and legitimise the ruling power of the time ,they did not write history just for the sake of writing but were being influenced by the prevailing situation of their time

true(yes)

Bal Gangadhar Tilak

nationalism lead to militarism by industrializtion ... industialization is like the begging of the tree .. then nationalism and militarism are branches ... :) ..... from a student of A AWESOME SMART HIGH SCHOOL ..... hope that's your answer to you question