Plagiarism

In most institutes of higher learning, failure to cite sources is considered an act of plagiarism.

The simplest is to be very careful and to avoid plagiarism.

Detention means lawful holding of a person by a state, government or individual by removing his/her freedom of liberty.

and

• the punishment of being kept in school after hours

I assume you are asking the difference between plagiarism & copyright infringement.

While both are essentially the use of someone elses work without permission, the most significant difference is that plagiarism also involves claiming that material as your own work.

A forum is a place for open discussion there is no way shape or form that any answer or comment left on a forum is copy-written. The only way that would be is if someone plagiarized.

Just email the site that you got it from, also you could look at the terms of service page that the site should have. I know sites like www.universalclipart.com are very accepting of people who want to use their clipart for offline things.

Who claims authorship of the "Christian Pledge of Allegiance"? No

The honest answer is always best. Take a good, hard look at yourself and figure out why you no longer want to be self-employed. Hopefully it's not just because your own business failed. If that is the reason, try to dig deeper. Why did it fail? Is it because you were not committed to making it succeed? (That's the #1 reason entrepreneurs fail: they give up too soon.) If you called it quits on your business decide how and why it happened. Practice explaining that story to yourself and your friends. Failing at one thing doesn't mean you'll be a failure at everything. The interviewer wants to know why you'll succeed at their workplace. Find the traits in yourself that didn't work for running your own business but will work helping their business succeed. People who have run their own businesses have a lot to offer employers. Even if your business failed, you will have a huge amount of wisdom and perspective that other employees without the same experience will never have. Find a way to sell your experience as a benefit; an asset for your potential employer instead of a liability.

It is certainly acceptable to quote the dictionary, with full credit, of course.

Redact.

No

No.

The purpose of a proper work cited page is to give credit to those who supplied the information used. Basically, if you use someone else's idea and do not supply a work cited page, you are plagiarizing.

Show samples of plagiarism. A few weeks ago I assigned a simple research paper to my high school science class. They were to write a single page, double spaced about one aspect of the coconut. For example they might choose to write about growing coconuts. An assignment such is this should always be in you own words. You read and take notes regarding the topic of research then you tell what you learned. Here is a sample of the work I got: The Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera) is a member of the Family Arecaceae (palm family). It is the only species in the genus Cocos, and is a large palm, growing to 30 m tall, with pinnate leaves 4-6 m long, pinnae 60-90 cm long; old leaves break away cleanly leaving the trunk smooth. The term coconutrefers to the fruit of the coconut palm. This is plagiarism. The student came to Wikipedia, highlighted and copied the information, pasted it in a word document and turned it in as his own work. Here's an example of putting this information in your own words: The Coconut Palm is a tree found in the tropical regions of the world. It's scientific name is Cocos nucifera and it comes from the Arecaceae family. This is a family of palm trees. There are many different types of palm trees, but only one species has the genus Cocos. The Coconut Palm can grow as high as 30 meters. It's leaves are called fronds and they might be between 4-6 meters long. The coconut palm bears a fruit known as the coconut. As you can clearly see, I have used the information found in the paragraph copied and pasted from Wikipedia, but I've changed up the sentences and added words creating my own report. Of course, I will also add a "Works Cited" page at the end of my paper giving Wikipedia credit for the information I used.

Do you have a job? What is your job? What do you like about your job? What is your name?

Actually, no. The Copyright Act only protects works that express original ideas or

information. For example, you could borrow liberally from the following without fear of

plagiarism:

• Compilations of readily available information, such as the phone book

• Works published by the U.S. government

• Facts that are not the result of original research (such as the fact that there are fifty

U.S. states, or that carrots contain Vitamin A)

• Works in the public domain (provided you cite properly)

Back in the day, before the internet, people had to actively pursue something to copy and to disguise as their own. They recognized that it was not their own writing. With the advent (always wanted to use that word) of the Internet, people were coming across information that they used in reports and other papers, without considering if they were breaking copyright laws both for the writing and the ideas. This has become such a problem for teachers who assign reports and other writing projects that there are now software programs available which analyze student's writing for unoriginal content.

It is generally easy to research the content of a document, if it's standard and pertaining to your business. This in all likelihood won't present you with any dilemmas associated with gaining new knowledge about the content you're required to organise. However, if I'm required to present different content to that which I'm used to, I have to consider 2 major factors in my research: # Exploratory research that structures and identifies the new content

# Constructive research that ensures the result of my explorative research is valid

Protocol then dictates that this new content is presented to the person who delegated the responsibility to me and is discussed to reach a resolution, regarding the presentation. Organising the subject matter involves the creation of processes and strict analysis of the content I've researched. This is usually a combined effort of the delegates and me, to establish an outline and mapping the outline. I ensure I use the information appropriately and I am aware of copyright laws and plagiarism. I use technology to organise the content and I manage the content with technology.

First of, I am highly convinced that this short, "Animator vs Animation" was inspired by the short "Duck Amuck". For all I know, the creator might have even plagiarized it, as it has many elements and ideas taken from that.

"Animator vs Animation" was created by Alan Becker. He most likely used a program called 'Macromedia Flash'. This program was created by the the company 'Adobe'. Like all programs, they must be learnt, and I recommend learning to draw first, before playing around with software that is to become outdated in a few years.

- Endeavourer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DO NOT DELETE ANSWER - ADD TO IT!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

all of the above

Yes. They're just ugly.

It is possible to get written permission from the copyright holder to use materials in a specific way. Requests should be made in writing, and it can take as long as several years for the request to be resolved.

No, content found through the Google search engine like images and text is still copyrighted. You will still need permission and cite your resources whenever used in order to adhere to educational policies and guidelines as well as the law.

not necessarily but if you change bits of it maybe you need a copyright license or something. i think that's it ask someone!

Generally speaking, it is not proper or legal to claim another person's book, as an example, as a work of one's own. The book is the product of the author's intellect. In cases where the "book" is copyrighted, it's serious breach of the law.

1. Persistent classroom disruption. 2. Fighting. 3. Snowball or rock throwing. 4. Disrespect of school personnel, school supervisors, and lunchroom monitors. 5. Use of cell phone during school hours.(includes if it rings in your backpack) 6. Dishonesty, cheating, or plagiarism. 7. Abusive or foul language. 8. Forgery of parent's signature. 9. Harassment of students or school personnel. 10. Conduct unbecoming a Christian student. 11. Inappropriate behavior during fire/disaster drills. (includes talking) 12. Bullying - the intentional and repeated harm to another's body, property, self-esteem, and/or to another's group acceptance.