Plagiarism

Cybercheating is also known as online plagiarism which is enabled by Technology-enabled cut and paste plagiarism.and online paper mills.

Plagiarism takes the intellectual work, written work, or other creative work, in whole or in part, and using it without crediting the source.

The source is the "creator" of the work. So, an "author" is any person who speaks or writes words, whether handwritten or typed, whether published or unpublished.

The "work" includes anything that you, yourself, did not write, using your own words. The rule is to "paraphrase" the original, but even in paraphrasing the words can be so close that it can be considered plagiarism. This is because words are not the only part protected under the copyright; the intellectual work is also protected. This means that some topics or points are so original that they cannot be paraphrased in any fashion that sufficiently changes the creator's intellectual or written work. Consider the 1980's fast food commercial in which an older woman exclaims, "Where's the beef?" There is no acceptable way to paraphrase that slogan. To use it without crediting either Wendy's, as the specific fast food restaurant or without crediting the advertising agency would be plagiarism. And in the case of , "Where's the beef?", the plagiarism would be readily apparent.

Plagiarism also involves a notion of how much is quoted. The rule is to only use the shortest portion of a work that illustrates or defines a point you are trying to make in your own original work. For example, let's say only one person created a new definition for a newly coined phrase (this often happens in various professions). If you wanted or needed to use that newly coined phrase and it's definition, you'd only use that portion. But you would not take 3 paragraphs from that person's work and use the whole portion.

To avoid plagiarism, use only the shortest amount necessary to support the point you are trying to make. Make index cards, clearly marking parts taken as a quote; use the back of the card for your original ideas that relate to that quote. Use quote marks around any part taken from someone else's work. Mark the quote using the appropriate Style, such as (author, page number) immediately after the portion quoted. Cite the work in your bibliography using the correct Style.

TIP: Did you know that the content on every website is "intellectual property" and should be treated as being under copyright? Even the questions and answers on WikiAnswers.com and on Answers.com are "works" that should be quoted and marked as 'words not my own' in your work. For example, above I typed: "To avoid plagiarism, use only the shortest amount necessary to support the point you are trying to make." If you use that sentence in a paper you write, you would 'cite the author' as my user name, with the full question (above), and then cite WikiAnswers.com as the website on which it appeared, along with the question's URL. Students will earn better grades if they are very aware of the rules for quoting someone else's words and giving proper credit.

It is cheating if you are being tested on your ownknowledge of a subject.

And what is the question?

Yes. Plagiarism is stealing. Changing around someone else's work does not make it your own original work. If you take someone's house, paint it a different color, and rearrange the furniture, it is still his house.

You can use someone else's idea to inspire you to write your own original work. Writers do that all the time. There are thousands of stories based on the idea of star-crossed lovers.

You can use quotes from someone else's work if you have permission from the original author and if you acknowledge the source of the quote.

A writer's words are copyrighted. Ideas are not.

IP is still the original copyright the case from George Harrison (my sweet lord music sound) was very similar to your question the riff of the music was similar therefor he lost his case because it wasnt his original idea but a version of from a popular song riff of another artist.

In most institutes of higher learning, failure to cite sources is considered an act of plagiarism.

The simplest is to be very careful and to avoid plagiarism.

Detention means lawful holding of a person by a state, government or individual by removing his/her freedom of liberty.

and

• the punishment of being kept in school after hours

I assume you are asking the difference between plagiarism & copyright infringement.

While both are essentially the use of someone elses work without permission, the most significant difference is that plagiarism also involves claiming that material as your own work.

A forum is a place for open discussion there is no way shape or form that any answer or comment left on a forum is copy-written. The only way that would be is if someone plagiarized.

Just email the site that you got it from, also you could look at the terms of service page that the site should have. I know sites like www.universalclipart.com are very accepting of people who want to use their clipart for offline things.

Who claims authorship of the "Christian Pledge of Allegiance"? No

The honest answer is always best. Take a good, hard look at yourself and figure out why you no longer want to be self-employed. Hopefully it's not just because your own business failed. If that is the reason, try to dig deeper. Why did it fail? Is it because you were not committed to making it succeed? (That's the #1 reason entrepreneurs fail: they give up too soon.) If you called it quits on your business decide how and why it happened. Practice explaining that story to yourself and your friends. Failing at one thing doesn't mean you'll be a failure at everything. The interviewer wants to know why you'll succeed at their workplace. Find the traits in yourself that didn't work for running your own business but will work helping their business succeed. People who have run their own businesses have a lot to offer employers. Even if your business failed, you will have a huge amount of wisdom and perspective that other employees without the same experience will never have. Find a way to sell your experience as a benefit; an asset for your potential employer instead of a liability.

It is certainly acceptable to quote the dictionary, with full credit, of course.

Redact.

No

No.

The purpose of a proper work cited page is to give credit to those who supplied the information used. Basically, if you use someone else's idea and do not supply a work cited page, you are plagiarizing.

Show samples of plagiarism. A few weeks ago I assigned a simple research paper to my high school science class. They were to write a single page, double spaced about one aspect of the coconut. For example they might choose to write about growing coconuts. An assignment such is this should always be in you own words. You read and take notes regarding the topic of research then you tell what you learned. Here is a sample of the work I got: The Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera) is a member of the Family Arecaceae (palm family). It is the only species in the genus Cocos, and is a large palm, growing to 30 m tall, with pinnate leaves 4-6 m long, pinnae 60-90 cm long; old leaves break away cleanly leaving the trunk smooth. The term coconutrefers to the fruit of the coconut palm. This is plagiarism. The student came to Wikipedia, highlighted and copied the information, pasted it in a word document and turned it in as his own work. Here's an example of putting this information in your own words: The Coconut Palm is a tree found in the tropical regions of the world. It's scientific name is Cocos nucifera and it comes from the Arecaceae family. This is a family of palm trees. There are many different types of palm trees, but only one species has the genus Cocos. The Coconut Palm can grow as high as 30 meters. It's leaves are called fronds and they might be between 4-6 meters long. The coconut palm bears a fruit known as the coconut. As you can clearly see, I have used the information found in the paragraph copied and pasted from Wikipedia, but I've changed up the sentences and added words creating my own report. Of course, I will also add a "Works Cited" page at the end of my paper giving Wikipedia credit for the information I used.

Do you have a job? What is your job? What do you like about your job? What is your name?

Actually, no. The Copyright Act only protects works that express original ideas or

information. For example, you could borrow liberally from the following without fear of

plagiarism:

• Compilations of readily available information, such as the phone book

• Works published by the U.S. government

• Facts that are not the result of original research (such as the fact that there are fifty

U.S. states, or that carrots contain Vitamin A)

• Works in the public domain (provided you cite properly)

Back in the day, before the internet, people had to actively pursue something to copy and to disguise as their own. They recognized that it was not their own writing. With the advent (always wanted to use that word) of the Internet, people were coming across information that they used in reports and other papers, without considering if they were breaking copyright laws both for the writing and the ideas. This has become such a problem for teachers who assign reports and other writing projects that there are now software programs available which analyze student's writing for unoriginal content.

It is generally easy to research the content of a document, if it's standard and pertaining to your business. This in all likelihood won't present you with any dilemmas associated with gaining new knowledge about the content you're required to organise. However, if I'm required to present different content to that which I'm used to, I have to consider 2 major factors in my research: # Exploratory research that structures and identifies the new content

# Constructive research that ensures the result of my explorative research is valid

Protocol then dictates that this new content is presented to the person who delegated the responsibility to me and is discussed to reach a resolution, regarding the presentation. Organising the subject matter involves the creation of processes and strict analysis of the content I've researched. This is usually a combined effort of the delegates and me, to establish an outline and mapping the outline. I ensure I use the information appropriately and I am aware of copyright laws and plagiarism. I use technology to organise the content and I manage the content with technology.

First of, I am highly convinced that this short, "Animator vs Animation" was inspired by the short "Duck Amuck". For all I know, the creator might have even plagiarized it, as it has many elements and ideas taken from that.

"Animator vs Animation" was created by Alan Becker. He most likely used a program called 'Macromedia Flash'. This program was created by the the company 'Adobe'. Like all programs, they must be learnt, and I recommend learning to draw first, before playing around with software that is to become outdated in a few years.

- Endeavourer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DO NOT DELETE ANSWER - ADD TO IT!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

all of the above