answersLogoWhite

0

US Foreign Policy

The US foreign policy is the policy through which the US interacts with other nations. The overall goal of this policy is to secure democracy for the benefit of both the American and international communities.

883 Questions

How did Vietnam benefit or not benefit from the US involvement and action in history?

Vietnam suffered due to US action in supporting South Vietnam in the Second Indochinese War (called the Vietnam War in the USA and called the American War in Vietnam). The Second Indochinese War cost over 2 million Vietnamese lives, destroyed the Vietnamese economy and was an extension of the First Indochina War in the eyes of the Vietnamese. There wee numerous US soldiers who massacred Vietnamese civilians. Additionally, during the Second Indochinese War the United States used numerous defoliants (products to kill plants) in order to more effectively move through the dense Vietnamese jungles. A number of these defoliants (especially Agent Orange) caused mutations and diseases in both Vietnamese civilians, soldiers and US servicemen. A number of US servicemen have successfully sued for compensation for their injuries, but there have never been any reparations paid to Vietnam for this injustice. Further the isolation that Vietnam received from its previous Communist benefactors after the war combined with the isolation that US gave to Communist Vietnam to promote economic problems. However, Vietnam and the United States were able to have a rapprochement in the 1990s and Vietnam is increasingly looking to the United States to help preserve its independence from China.

Why is the USA an enemy of Iran?

Partially it is due to religious views in Iran. In their view the American lifestyle goes against Islamic law, thus making us sinful. Additionally, the U.S. is allied with Israel a primarily Jewish-controlled country that was set up largely in place of the mostly Islamic-controlled Palestine. Iran and other Islamic nations resent the U.S. support of Jewish control over what Christians Jews, and Muslims alike regard as the Holy Land. However, part of it has to do with the direct relation in history history of the U.S. with Iran. In 1953 a joint operation of U.S. and British intelligence agencies, headed by Kermit Roosevelt of the CIA, incited a coup that overthrew the popular and democratically elected Mohammad Mosaddegh after he declared plans to nationalize oil fields owned by British oil companies. In his place they installed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, popularly known as the Shah. He was a brutal dictator and his rule was supported by the U.S. until his overthrow in 1979. After his overthrow he was taken into the U.S. for medical treatment, which sparked much resentment among the Iranians, and some in Iran feared the U.S. would try to reinstall him. This history has brought about a strong dislike and distrust for the U.S. in that country.
Because we tell jokes

What ideas on presidential powers did President Lincoln share with President Nixon?

Students of political science become aware that in the sphere of government policies are often related to positions of power. When Abraham Lincoln was serving in the House of Representatives he shared the same view on presidential control on US foreign policy and troop deployment as did Representative Richard Nixon in 1951. Both believed that the president was exceeding his authority concerning the deployment of troops as it related to foreign policy. Then the presidents were Polk, and later, Truman.When their positions of power dramatically changed, they held the opposite view. That change occurred when both Lincoln and Nixon became US presidents.

So often politics is seen through the scope of personality rather than that of public policy and the rule of law.

Why do most people hate the people in the middle east but that's where Jesus walked?

Answer 1

You must understand that not all people are religious to begin with. And also most people are uneducated about the country's history, The first they heard of the middle eastern country's when they were linked to 9/11 and terrorism/the war in iraq.

People can be stupid sometimes

Answer 2

Jesus lived in the Middle East 2000 years ago; a lot has happened since his death. Among the many things that has happened is the establishment of the modern Islamic religion, the modern Arab and Iranian States, the various wars and histories of Western States, and the development of non-theocratic governments. Many people (not most people) have hatred for the ideologies that come from the Middle East, especially when those ideologies clash with the Western lifestyle and values that they treasure.

Who represents the US' interest in Cuba?

The United States maintains a mission in Cuba known as the U.S. Interests Section. While not an official embassy, it is charged with acting as a liaison service.

What is policy impact?

Lessons learned from past experiences to inform new initiatives

Who referred to the Domino theory as a reason to support liberation of communist countries?

US President Dwight D. Eisenhower spoke of it in a news conference in 1954.

See the related Wikipedia link listed below for more information:

Is Lebanon friendly or hostile to the US?

It depends entirely on who is in power in Lebanon. When the Christians in Lebanon have more power, they pursue a more Pro-US orientation because they can see the US a security guarantor. When the Shiite Muslims in Lebanon, especially Hezbollah, have more power, they pursue a more hostile anti-US orientation because they see the US a shill for the Israelis. The US has a functional relationship with Lebanon, but no serious alliances, military agreements, or trade agreements between the US and Lebanon.

Parts for American Arms?

find the name of your arm from your fingers to the elbow.

Why is china a security concern for the united states?

As China's economy and military are growing, the Chinese government has become more aggressive as concerns key US interests in East Asia, such as (1) weakening North Korea, (2) preserving Taiwanese independence, and (3) supporting the territorial claims US allies like the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia in the South China Sea.

How did the US react in 1956 when Britain France and Israel invaded Egypt and occupied the Suez Canal and why?

Prior to the British, French, and Israeli Invasion, the State Department already had a few objectives as concerns Egypt. They wanted to prevent a second Arab-Israeli War and they wanted to keep the Suez Canal in European hands since its nationalization could have a negative impact on the passage of freight (and petroleum) from the Persian Gulf to Europe and the Americas. In 1956, Nasser, President of Egypt, decided to nationalize the Suez Canal. It was in retaliation that the British, French, and Israelis invaded Egypt in an attempt to compel Egypt to return the Canal to European control.

US President Eisenhower's response was to attempt to negotiate a compromise where Egypt would be allowed to maintain control over the Suez Canal provided that they paid the British compensation for the nationalization and did not restrict trade (meaning that they would follow the Constantinople Convention of the Suez Canal of 1888). However, Eisenhower was opposed to any military action in the Middle East and compelled the British, French, and Israeli forces to withdraw from sovereign Egyptian territory. These events led to the Eisenhower Doctrine, which pledged that the US would distribute economic and military aid and, if necessary, use military force to contain communism in the Middle East.

Did the US invade the Soviet Union in the early 1920s?

Yes, Both the Polar Bear Expedition and the American Expeditionary Force Siberia, landed In the Ports Of Arkhangelsk, and Vladivostok to Intervene In the 1920's October Revolution and fought against the Reds.

When did the executive agreement become a major instrument in US foreign policy?

As early as 1817, the executive agreement became an instrument of major foreign policy matters.This revolved around the limitation of naval forces on the Great Lakes. President Monroe and Great Britain reached an accord on this matter.

How Is the Bush Doctrine different from the Obama Doctrine?

The phrase Bush Doctrine was first used by political commentator Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's unilateral withdrawals from the ABM treaty and the Kyoto Protocol. The phrase initially described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Unlike the Monroe Doctrine, the Obama Doctrine is not a specific foreign policy introduced by the executive, but rather a phrase used to describe Obama's general style of foreign policy. This has left journalists and political commentators to speculate on what the exact tenets of an Obama Doctrine would be

The terms "Bush Doctrine" and "Obama Doctrine" as they are commonly discussed are probably misnamed. The term "Bush Doctrine" was invented by Bush opponents during the Obama/McCain campaign and those that invented it apparently meant it to mean Bush's War in Iraq, his economic policies, his social ideas on issues like stem cell research, abortion, etc. Similarly, the Obama Doctrine is more directed at Obama's general philosophy and policies.

This can be better understood by comparing them to the Monroe Doctrine or the Truman Doctrine. These are doctrines that define how the United States aligns itself with the rest of the World.

It might be better to talk of Bush's policies versus the Obama policies. That makes it much easier to answer the above question.

Bush's policies favor the free market (capitalism) while Obama's policies favor Government control of the market (socialism) and redistribution of wealth (communism). If you don't like the terms socialism and communism being used when describing Obama, maybe some clarification is in order.

A common definition of socialism is when the Government runs industry.

And communism is best described by Karl Marx in his communist manifesto as:

".....from those according to their abilities .... to those according to their needs.... "

or in the words of Obama, "Spread the wealth."

Does the United States still pay for the attack on Japan?

This question makes an incorrect underlying assumption, namely that the United States began paying any sort of compensation to Japan for the atomic bombing. The United States at no time made any such payment and as a result, it cannot still be paying them.