Coffee

if you dropit

TSparenborg's Full Review: Cuisinart ICAPP-4 Iced Cappuccino is all the rage now a days. And like so many others my husband and I became "addicted" to the stuff. We were spending close to $50.00 a month to to get our "fix".When this machine came out both our eyes lite up. We thought WOW if we got that machine we could make our own, we could maybe save money too. So I set out one day in search for the marvelous machine. When I got it home I couldn't wait until I got it open, just so I could make our first pot.

I eagerly opened up the box, read the very useful manual that comes with it and did everything step by step. It's really no harder than making a regular pot of coffee.First you pour water in the water chamber, which is clearly marked for 2 cups or 4. Then you add your coffee grounds ( ground fine like you were making hot cappuccino) to it's container, place that on top of the water chamber. On top of that is where you add the milk, which is also marked for 2 or 4 cups. Put ice in the pitcher for either 2 or 4 cups again. Plug the machine in, turn the little knob on top of the machine to heat, and push the on/off button.

Heating time of the water is around one minute, and a red light on the front of the machine tells you that it's heating. Once the water is hot enough a green light will come on, and you will hear a slight fan noise as the coffee starts to flow out of the machine and into the pitcher. At this time you then turn the same knob you turned to heat in the beginning to dispense milk, and the milk will start to flow. After it's done brewing the machine will shut off by itself or you can just push the on/off button. All total from start to finish it takes around 5 minutes. About one minute to heat the water, another minute for it to dispense into the pitcher. The other three would be for the prep work.

Clean up is just as easy. The pitcher, milk contanier, coffee holder, and the drip tray are all top rack dish washer safe. Or they are easily cleaned with soap and water in your sink.

So we did it, we made our first pot of iced cappuccino at home. How did it taste right? Well I will honestly say that our first pot was good, but it didn't taste like what we were use to. For me it wasn't sweet enough, but with a little time and kind of changing the instructions a bit, our next pot tasted even better. You see they say to put any flavorings in the pitcher ( ie. sugar, chocolate syrup, etc.) I found out the when you put the sugar in there it doesn't "melt" very well and no amount of stirring helps. You end up with a glob of sugar on the bottom and not in your cup. So I solved this by adding the sugar in with the coffee grounds. Doing it that way melts the sugar, and you have a perfect tasting cappuccino.

The machine also comes with it's own measuring scoop. And if you grind your own beans two scoops of whole beans, grinds up to just the right amount for 4 cups of cappuccino.

All in all the machine is a good buy for the money. It takes up no more room than your standard coffee maker. If your willing to take the time to brew your own iced cappuccino and like to experiment with different flavors of coffee then this machine is for you. Plus by brewing your own you can watch your fat content by using no fat milk instead of whole.

We've had our machine for over a year now and in a months time it has paid for itself. My only dislikes would be that I wish you could make more than just 4 cups at a time. But as long as your not serving a crowd than 4 cups is just the right amount.

mmmm Distribution (or placement) is one of the four aspects of marketing. A distributor is the middleman between the manufacturer and retailer. After a product is manufactured it may be warehoused or shipped to the next echelon in the supply chain, typically either a distributor, retailer or consumer. The other three parts of the marketing mix are product management, pricing, and promotion. [hide]

* 1 Explanation * 2 The distribution channel ** 2.1 Channels ** 2.2 Channel members ** 2.3 The internal market ** 2.4 Channel Decisions ** 2.5 Channel membership ** 2.6 Channel motivation ** 2.7 Monitoring and managing channels ** 2.8 Vertical marketing ** 2.9 Horizontal marketing * 3 References * 4 See also ** 4.1 Specific types of distribution * 5 External links Broadly speaking, distribution concerns the methods, processes, infrastructure, institutions and pricing mechanisms required to bring a product from manufacturers to consumers. Product may pass from distribution partner to consumer via various "channels of trade", where a channel of trade is defined to be an established market mechanism for distributing and selling products that follows a well-understood set of merchandising, settlement and delivery policies. Consequently, distribution strategy encompasses elements of marketing, merchandising, delivery and logistics: the set of business rules and processes used to move the product or service through the supply chain to the end customer. Distribution strategy addresses questions about appropriate logistics service providers (such as 3PL's), channels of trade, pricing and service policy. For example: * Should the product be sold through a retailer? * Should the product be distributed through wholesale? * Should multi-level marketing channels be used? * How long should the channel be (how many members)? * Where should the product or service be available? * When should the product or service be available? * Should distribution be exclusive, selective or intensive? * Who should control the channel (referred to as the channel captain)? * Should channel relationships be informal or contractual? * Should channel members share advertising (referred to as co-op ads)? * Should electronic methods of distribution be used? * Are there physical distribution and logistical issues to deal with? * What will it cost to keep an inventory of products on store shelves and in channel warehouses (referred to as filling the pipeline)? Frequently there may be a chain of intermediaries, each passing the product down the chain to the next organization, before it finally reaches the consumer or end-user. This process is known as the 'distribution chain' or the 'channel.' Each of the elements in these chains will have their own specific needs, which the producer must take into account, along with those of the all-important end-user. A number of alternate 'channels' of distribution may be available: * Selling direct, such as via mail order, Internet and telephone sales * Agent, who typically sells direct on behalf of the producer * Distributor (also called wholesaler), who sells to retailers * Retailer (also called dealer or reseller), who sells to end customers * Advertisement typically used for consumption goods Distribution channels may not be restricted to physical products alone. They may be just as important for moving a service from producer to consumer in certain sectors, since both direct and indirect channels may be used. Hotels, for example, may sell their services (typically rooms) directly or through travel agents, tour operators, airlines, tourist boards, centralized reservation systems, etc. There have also been some innovations in the distribution of services. For example, there has been an increase in franchising and in rental services - the latter offering anything from televisions through tools. There has also been some evidence of service integration, with services linking together, particularly in the travel and tourism sectors. For example, links now exist between airlines, hotels and car rental services. In addition, there has been a significant increase in retail outlets for the service sector. Outlets such as estate agencies and building society offices are crowding out traditional grocers from major shopping areas. Distribution channels can thus have a number of levels. Kotler defined the simplest level, that of direct contact with no intermediaries involved, as the 'zero-level' channel. The next level, the 'one-level' channel, features just one intermediary; in consumer goods a retailer, for industrial goods a distributor. In small markets (such as small countries) it is practical to reach the whole market using just one- and zero-level channels. In large markets (such as larger countries) a second level, a wholesaler for example, is now mainly used to extend distribution to the large number of small, neighborhood retailers. In Japan the chain of distribution is often complex and further levels are used, even for the simplest of consumer goods. In Bangladesh Telecom Operators are using different Chains of Distribution, especially 'second level'. In IT and Telecom industry levels are named "tiers". A one tier channel means that vendors IT product manufacturers (or software publishers) work directly with the dealers. A one tier / two tier channel means that vendors work directly with dealers and with distributors who sell to dealers. Many of the marketing principles and techniques which are applied to the external customers of an organization can be just as effectively applied to each subsidiary's, or each department's, 'internal' customers. In some parts of certain organizations this may in fact be formalized, as goods are transferred between separate parts of the organization at a `transfer price'. To all intents and purposes, with the possible exception of the pricing mechanism itself, this process can and should be viewed as a normal buyer-seller relationship. The fact that this is a captive market, resulting in a `monopoly price', should not discourage the participants from employing marketing techniques. Less obvious, but just as practical, is the use of `marketing' by service and administrative departments; to optimize their contribution to their `customers' (the rest of the organization in general, and those parts of it which deal directly with them in particular). In all of this, the lessons of the non-profit organizations, in dealing with their clients, offer a very useful parallel. * Channel strategy * Product (or service)<>Cost<>Consumer location

The channel decision is very important. In theory at least, there is a form of trade-off: the cost of using intermediaries to achieve wider distribution is supposedly lower. Indeed, most consumer goods manufacturers could never justify the cost of selling direct to th Many of the theoretical arguments about channels therefore revolve around cost. On the other hand, most of the practical decisions are concerned with control of the consumer. The small company has no alternative but to use intermediaries, often several layers of them, but large companies 'do' have the choice. However, many suppliers seem to assume that once their product has been sold into the channel, into the beginning of the distribution chain, their job is finished. Yet that distribution chain is merely assuming a part of the supplier's responsibility; and, if he has any aspirations to be market-oriented, his job should really be extended to managing, albeit very indirectly, all the processes involved in that chain, until the product or service arrives with the end-user. This may involve a number of decisions on the part of the supplier: * Channel membership * Channel motivation * Monitoring and managing channels # Intensive distribution - Where the majority of resellers stock the `product' (with convenience products, for example, and particularly the brand leaders in consumer goods markets) price competition may be evident. # Selective distribution - This is the normal pattern (in both consumer and industrial markets) where `suitable' resellers stock the product. # Exclusive distribution - Only specially selected resellers or authorized dealers (typically only one per geographical area) are allowed to sell the `product'. It is difficult enough to motivate direct employees to provide the necessary sales and service support. Motivating the owners and employees of the independent organizations in a distribution chain requires even greater effort. There are many devices for achieving such motivation. Perhaps the most usual is `incentive': the supplier offers a better margin, to tempt the owners in the channel to push the product rather than its competitors; or a competition is offered to the distributors' sales personnel, so that they are tempted to push the product. At the other end of the spectrum is the almost symbiotic relationship that the all too rare supplier in the computer field develops with its agents; where the agent's personnel, support as well as sales, are trained to almost the same standard as the supplier's own staff. In much the same way that the organization's own sales and distribution activities need to be monitored and managed, so will those of the distribution chain. In practice, many organizations use a mix of different channels; in particular, they may complement a direct salesforce, calling on the larger accounts, with agents, covering the smaller customers and prospects. This relatively recent development integrates the channel with the original supplier - producer, wholesalers and retailers working in one unified system. This may arise because one member of the chain owns the other elements (often called `corporate systems integration'); a supplier owning its own retail outlets, this being 'forward' integration. It is perhaps more likely that a retailer will own its own suppliers, this being 'backward' integration. (For example, MFI, the furniture retailer, owns Hygena which makes its kitchen and bedroom units.) The integration can also be by franchise (such as that offered by McDonald's hamburgers and Benetton clothes) or simple co-operation (in the way that Marks & Spencer co-operates with its suppliers). Alternative approaches are 'contractual systems', often led by a wholesale or retail co-operative, and `administered marketing systems' where one (dominant) member of the distribution chain uses its position to co-ordinate the other members' activities. This has traditionally been the form led by manufacturers. The intention of vertical marketing is to give all those involved (and particularly the supplier at one end, and the retailer at the other) 'control' over the distribution chain. This removes one set of variables from the marketing equations. Other research indicates that vertical integration is a strategy which is best pursued at the mature stage of the market (or product). At earlier stages it can actually reduce profits. It is arguable that it also diverts attention from the real business of the organization. Suppliers rarely excel in retail operations and, in theory, retailers should focus on their sales outlets rather than on manufacturing facilities ( Marks & Spencer, for example, very deliberately provides considerable amounts of technical assistance to its suppliers, but does not own them).