Marriage

It's the incorrect use of your energy. You are arguing about something that doesn't need to be argued about. Let me be clear: there's no need to argue about ANYTHING. Why? Because you can't take anything anyone else does personally. NOthing that other person does is because of you; it's because of them and when you take it personally, you get angry and offended and then you get defensive and you have the need to make them wrong so you can be right and, before you know it, you're in an argument. You go round and round in circles and nobody comes out winning; both people come out tired. The reality is this: arguing doesn't serve a purpose. It's better to say to the other person, "Let's not fight about this. What do you need me to do?" Let them get it all off their chest. Ask again, "How can I make this situation better for you?" and then once they've said everything, you take your turn and say, "Now let me tell how you can help me make our relationship stronger. This is what I need from you. Can you do that?" Make it about the situation (because it's always about the situation) and don't make it about the other person and it won't be an argument. Once it gets personal, it's no longer about you; it's about them and then you're in for an argument. Get ready to be tired. Wasting energy will always leave you tired.

5.10

It's really hard to go into hiding in today's world. You'd have to quit using plastic at all, because your cards can be traced; cell phones can be traced also, so you'd have to use disposable phones or quit using phones at all. The best way would be to go someplace way out in the wilderness and camp, but you'd have to learn how to survive out there.

It means love.

Oh, I know I know. Misty Peppard? What did I win?

teens hate their parents, so there are no advantages.

It seems like there might be a typo in your question. If you're asking for the definition of "definition," it refers to a statement that explains the meaning of a word, phrase, or concept. Definitions provide clarity and understanding by outlining the characteristics or essential qualities of the term being defined. They are fundamental in communication, helping to ensure that all parties have a shared understanding of the topic at hand.

No.

The big question you have to answer is why is this guy your ex if you love him and he loves you. If you can figure out why it did not work, you would know that being happily married to a great guy is the best place to be.

Who disciplines you? She is an adult, just like you are. It is not your place to discipline her. Putting your hands on her to punish her would also be considered domestic violence in most places, which you can be arrested for.

Husbands and wives can choose to swap partners in consensual non-monogamous arrangements, such as swinging or polyamory, but this is not a common practice for all couples. Such decisions are typically based on mutual consent and communication about boundaries and feelings. It's essential for couples to discuss their desires and establish trust before engaging in any form of partner swapping. Ultimately, the decision varies greatly between individual couples and their values.

Yes, it is possible. The requirements are:

1. Convince a rabbi to assist you.

2. 1-6 years of study.

3. Go before a religious court to get approval for the conversion.

4. Go to 'mikvah', a ritual bath (NOT the same as a baptism).

5. Circumcision or symbolic circumcision for men.

Yes but he probably has a lot of loves. A cheater will continue to cheat. You would never be able to trust him or her.

ANSWER:

When you say lover, is he a married man? If you are this woman his having an affair, well he could as long as your giving him his needs that his wife is not giving it to him,( that's what he said). Now ask yourself are you the only one he have on the side. If he can do this to his wife, how can you be sure that your not the only one he have. Be a bit smarter, not because his focus on you, it doesn't mean that he will divorce his wife and be with you. You can't never trust some married men who don't care about hurting his wife.

If a man or woman really want a divorce then they can start divorce proceedings, so he's handing you a line. He wants his cake and eat it too. He may have business tied up in his wife's name, doesn't want to give her the house, or other properties or, he could still love her, but just loves to fool around. It's not wise to date a married man, because the stats are high that they seldom will marry their mistress. I was married before with no children and no property, but I still went for the divorce even though it turned ugly on my ex's part. I wanted that divorce so bad (I had met someone else I loved and eventually married) that I was at that lawyers office, kicked some butt and 8 months later got my divorce and my ex had to pay for it too! So, don't believe this guy and kick his butt out of there and tell him unless he can produce divorce papers then you don't want to see him again. Good luck Marcy

Go together to a marriage counselor, you can fix it.

A marriage counselor is a good idea, but, getting someone to look after the children and planning a nice vacation with your wife is a good start. Tell her you both need time together and talk things out. You admitted you worked too much. Some people are workaholics and forget the very important things in their life such as wife, children, family and friends. All work and no play is a one way road to a heart attack!

His bio says 6'2"

martin's to be wife

Whatever rights they agree to.

Yes it is, if you love her the way she is.

However if is persisting and possibly annoying and perturbing the relationship seek professional counseling before the marriage.

If you both are going to get married at least you will learn how to deal with any situations.

No

not that great

I have never walked away from a marriage ut I would assume walking away at any point would never be "easy". You have to consider that twenty years is along time to be with someone & depending n your age it could be half of your life that you have spent with this person ! It is a long time to give of yourself , your life & whole being to just walk away. I would say make sure , do the pro'd & cons over & over unless it is abusive. Why after twenty year would you leave, I mean you have gone through so much together and to throw it all away !!

ANSWER:

I did walk away from my husband after 22 years of being with him, day in and day out. I gave my life, my heart, and my soul to this man. I stood by him and listened to him when his having a problem. I waited for him when he was in the Navy and gone 6 months per year. I gave up my career to be a full time wife. I didn't complained when his family never accepted me as part of his family. I protected him from those people he calls friend. And it was me who always initiate sex since the moment we met. I gave him 3 beautiful children. I made him feel love, special and my first priority since we got married. But for him to joined a dating site and fell in love with a married woman he met on a dating site was the sign that he never appreciated me, nor love me that way a man loves his wife..

The German word Verm(ae)hlung = marriage.

The truth is is, no one can tell. Either through science or spiritual approach.

All parties generally must consent to the interception or recording of any private communication, whether conducted by telephone, telegraph, radio or face-to-face, to comply with state law. Wash. Rev. Code § 9.73.030. The all-party consent requirement can be satisfied if "one party has announced to all other parties engaged in the communication or conversation, in any reasonably effective manner, that such communication or conversation is about to be recorded or transmitted." In addition, if the conversation is to be recorded, the requisite announcement must be recorded as well. Wash. Rev. Code § 9.73.030.

A party is determined to have consented to recording if he is aware that the recording is taking place. Washington v. Modica, 149 P.3d 446 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006).

Consent to recording of real-time conversation using online discussion software is implicit because participants know the conversations will be recorded on the other party's computer. Washington v. Townsend, 20 P.3d 1027 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001).

Moreover, an employee of a news organization engaged in newsgathering is deemed to have the requisite consent to record and divulge the contents of conversations "if the consent is expressly given or if the recording or transmitting device is readily apparent or obvious to the speakers." Wash. Rev. Code § 0.73.030(4). Anyone speaking to an employee of a news organization who has been deemed to have given consent cannot withdraw that consent after the communication has been made. Wash. Rev. Code § 0.73.030(4).

Statutory liability exists only for nonconsensual recording or intercepting, not divulging, of private conversations. Kearney v. Kearney. 974 P.2d 872 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). The statutory terms "record" and "intercept" do not encompass the meaning of divulge.

Whether a communication is considered "private" under the statute depends on the factual circumstances. Washington v. Townsend, 57 P.2d 255 (Wash. 2002). The state Supreme Court has identified three factors bearing on the reasonable expectations and intent of the parties: (1) duration and subject matter of the conversation, (2) location of conversation and presence or potential presence of a third party, and (3) role of the non-consenting party and his or her relationship to the consenting party. Lewis v. State Dept. of Licensing, 139 P.3d 1078 (Wash. 2006).