C Programming

I would pay $1000 for this Pro Conceal .45 acp!

The lower-level the language, the harder it is to write programs in. It takes a long time to write a program in machine language...and it is way more trouble than writing it in an abstracted language.

This functionality is already in Java. String.toLowerCase() and String.toUpperCase() will take care of it for you.

main void void void (void)

{ float temp1 [13]= {1,4,2,3,4,5,7,88,9,4,3,23,12};

1. Find the element is the list. Let pointer 'p' point to it.

2. Delete it from the list:

if (p->Prev) p->Prev->Next = p->Next;

else List->First = p->Next;

if (p->Next) p->Next->Prev = p->Prev;

else List->Last = p->Prev;

3. Release the memory associated with it.

C itself does not support default values for function arguments, if that is your definition of parameter.

In languages that do, like C++/python/ and Java (presumably) you can use default parameters as a rudimentary form of polymorphism in the sense that you can call the function or method with a minimal set of arguments assuming the that others are defaulted to the values you want, this can be actual defaulted values like the number -1, or sentinel values that omit functionality in the function/method you are calling.

You will, in most of these languages that support this, have to arrange the position of the defaulted arguments to the end of the argument list, and in doing so it would be best to prioritize them from least likely to use the default value to the most from left to right. This in design time can conflict with function/method overloading where you vary the number of arguments in the prototypes of your overloaded function, so I consider these two features of a language mutually exclusive, i.e. don't use them together unless you have a good reason.

This feature is rarely useful but in saying "rarely" when it is, it is the most helpful. I find it and so do the creators of the C++ libraries helpful for class constructors when sometimes you need to set some internal features during construction time.

go to moldymen.com to find the information.

printf("TSR");

If you are talking about a terminate and stay resident DOS program, the easiest way to write a TSR is to use a TSR toolkit, which does all of the basic work for you. Otherwise, even to describe the process would take too long (it can be quite complex).

Modularisation. It could also be called refactoring, where large and complex functions are split into several simpler functions, making code easier to read. Refactoring can also help to reduce code duplication.

The native C language will not permit the addition of two 100 digit numbers with native data types. Therefore, you need to simulate the 100 digit numbers differently, and that can be done various ways, including using an arbitrary precision math package, or BCD arithmetic, etc.

A programmable timer usually just means a timer that can be programmed to go off at any time.

There is no gotoxy statement in C.

If you want to type in punjabi, you have to download a font, i believe its Gurmikhi. But documents written using these fonts are not portable. Means you will require to carry the font along with your document if you want to use same document on some other system. Also you can not post content, written using these fonts, on websites (like your blog, community sites, etc).

You will rather require to write your content in UNICODE format. There are many Virtual Punjabi Keyboard (web based) which provides you such facility. You can try http://www.shriwaheguru.com/punjabi_keyboard.html

For start: they are header files.

no

It's actually 3 stages: preprocessing, compilation and linking.

Preprocessing deals with all the preprocessor directives (all lines beginning with #). So a line such as #include<stdio.h> will effectively copy/paste the contents of the stdio.h header in place of the directive. The header itself may also contain preprocessor directives and these must be processed prior to insertion. Macros are also processed at this stage and all comments are stripped out. The end result is a translation unit that contains pure C code with absolutely no macros, no directives and no comments whatsoever. The translation unit is usually stored in working memory, however your IDE may include a switch that allows you to examine the contents of the translation unit.

The compiler processes each translation unit in isolation. Since the compiler cannot see any other translation units, only names with internal linkage can be resolved at compile time. The compiler produces an object file from the translation unit. The object file contains machine code along with a table of any names that couldn't be resolved by the compiler (those with external linkage).

Once all translation units have been compiled, the linker can examine the object files and resolve the outstanding external linkage problems, essentially linking all the object files into a single executable.

Problems can occur at any stage. For instance, preprocessing could result in a macro expansion that generates code that cannot be compiled. The compiler cannot resolve these problems because the compiler never saw the macro, it only saw the code that was generated by the preprocessor. So although it can identify the problem in the translation unit, it cannot identify where that problem originated. This is why macros are so difficult to debug: the compiler cannot help you.

Aside from macro problems, the compiler can identify and help you resolve a wide range of problems in your code thus it pays to make use of it as much as possible. The compiler can also statically assert your assumptions, perform compile-time computations and optimise your code through inline expansion, thus ensuring your code is error free and operates at peak performance.

Link-time errors are more difficult to deal with, but usually mean you've violated the one-definition rule (ODR) in some way, either by providing two different definitions for the same name or by not providing any definition of a name.

Even if no errors occur and linking is successful, it does not mean your executable is error free. The computer will only do exactly what you've told it to do, but it cannot account for logic errors at runtime. Many of these can be caught at compile time by making prudent use of static assertions, however this isn't always possible so you should also provide "sanity" checks wherever necessary and include appropriate error handling wherever runtime logic cannot be guaranteed to hold.

#include
#include
void hanoi(int x, char from,char to,char aux)
{
if(x==1)
{
printf("Move Disk From %c to %c\n",from,to);
}
else
{
hanoi(x-1,from,aux,to);
printf("Move Disk From %c to %c\n",from,to);
hanoi(x-1,aux,to,from);
}
}
int main(void)
{
int disk;
clrscr();
printf("Enter the number of disks you want to play with:");
scanf("%d",&disk);
double moves=pow(2,disk)-1;
printf("\nThe No of moves required is=%g \n",moves);
hanoi(disk,'A','C','B');
getch();
}

It runs on ASPNET (IIS Default Account) found under AD or Users and Computers. The password is autogenerated and DO NOT change the password. If done, there is a document by MS to resolve the issue. Kind regards, Imtiaz Hasham

SME IT Networks

import java.io.*;

class test

{

public static void main()throws IOException

{

String s,p="";

char ch;

BufferedReader br=new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));

int i,c=0;

//input statement

System.out.println("Enter any string");

s=br.readLine();

s=s+" ";

for(i=0;i<s.length();i++)

{

ch=s.charAt(i);

if(ch!=' ')

{

p=p+ch;

}

else

{

if(p.startsWith("a")p.startsWith("e")p.startsWith("i")p.startsWith("o")p.startsWith("u"))

{

c++;

System.out.println(p.toUpperCase());

}

p="";

}

}

System.out.print("Total Words Starting with Vowels="+c);

}

}

by :

Pradeep Sir

Infonet Global Solutions

E-Block new Tempo Stand, Rajaji puram,

Lucknow-17

mob:- +91-9450821737

Each of them is possible. (There's zero of them, mind you.)

Interpreted means - normally - the code is interpreted at run-time, while parsed (actually, it's "compiled") means the code is translated to a native object file at compile-time, and then executed. Compiled code is usually faster, also.

It depends on what you're personally comfortable with AND whether or not you think others will be able to read it (if it is meant for others to do so). I personally write with a combination of boths cursive and print. It seems weird, but it is still clearly written and readable. With technology on the rise, it seems that the art of cursive (or handwriting, or just writing period) seems to going out the door.