0
Dictatorship
The English term 'dictatorship' means a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator, not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc. Throughout history, there have been famous dictators such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Saddam Hussein.
1,458 Questions
fascism :)
Was napoleon a modern dictator?
Yes, he was a modern dictator. What made Napoleon's dictatorship modern was that it embodied popular sovereignty. The people should govern but they need some kind of representation and that can be one person--a dictator. A modern dictator exercises political authority in the name of the people and Napoleon promised peace and stability after such a horrific time of turmoil from the French Revolution.
Why did people put their faith in totalitarian dictators who propelled their nations into war?
In Germany at the time the economy was in shambles and people where on real hard times. Hitler promised a better life for Germany. In the early stages of his power Hitler was viewed as a hero for turning the country around and believe it or not was envied by other leaders. It has been argued that if Hitler didn't go off the deep end he would have been held in high regard. That all went out the window when war started. People in Germany stilled believed in him but of course he lost much of his shine after invading Poland. Remarkably the world really took a blind eye to his treatment of the Jews up to this point. Once he had a shipped filled with deported Jews and watched as country after country refused their entry. This only reinforced his notion that Jews must go and shortly afterward the persecution of the Jews became harsher.
Sparta was therefore not as much of a totalitarian state as a modernity dictatorship like North Korea.
What did lucius cornelius sulla Felix conquer as dictator?
Rome, but only because he marched on Rome. during his dispute with Marius. Most of Sulla's conquests were in the east as a general (Greece, Mithradtes,etc.) however he did win the war against the Samnites in Italy right outside of Rome itself. But as a dictator, Sulla devoted his energies to returning the government to the original concept of the republic.
Why does India need a dictator?
No and never. India, the largest democratic country of the world; does not need a dictator. The people of India have power to write their fate with their own hands. Here, no one can be a dictator for the people of India.
Who was the first communist dictator of russia after the 1917 revolution?
Vladimir Lenin was the first communist dictator of Russia after the 1917 revolution.
How important was the use of violence in making Hitler dictator in 1934?
Personally, I think that the violence between 1933 and 1934 was very important as it showed Hitler that violence wouldn't work and that he'd have to use a different approach. The violence, such as the Munich Putsch, showed Hitler that other methods would have to be used. As a result of the Munich Putsch, 16 Nazis were killed and Hitler was sent to prison. Obviously, this sent a pretty clear message that violence wasn't going to work. In prison, Hitler had valuable thinking time where he wrote 'Mein Kampf' and, as shown in source B, this caused Hitler to change his methods which lead to him gaining support and eventually becoming dictator.
Adolf Hitler was the leader in the rise of the Nazi party. Adolf Hitler has a distinct personality to bring harm to people and to perpetuate hatred. If there was another person during that time that had that same lust for power and desire to hurt people then someone other than Hitler could have lead that regime.
Which member of the second triumvirate eventually became dictator for life?
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
None. You're getting your triumvirates confused. Julius Caesar, a member of the first triumvirate, became dictator for life. As far as the second triumvirate went, Octavian was the one who won out and became emperor, which was sort of a dictatorship, although not in the strict sense of the word.
Stalin ruled the Soviet from 1928 to 1953,which is 25 years.
Do you believe a dictator could take over the United States?
Probably not, first of all because of the position and power of the US government it is very unlikely that a dictator could take over. Putting aside the even more unlikely case of an external invasion, the US government is designed in such a way as to make it very difficult for this to happen. Even if it did, the people of the United States are educated in such a way as to value democracy and freedom as such important concepts for their country that a dictatorship likely would not last if it were to be instated at any point.
Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna was a dictator of what country?
they werent a dictator but it was in Texas
Who was a harsh dictator who led former Yugoslavia after World War 2?
Josip Broz Tito - Marshal of Yugoslavia from 1943 until his death in 1980. He defied Russia during the Cold War and kept the Yugoslavian states together as one country.
Who was the dictator of India during World War 2?
Mahatma Ghandi was the spiritual leader. The Brits ruled India during world war 2 and there was no dictator.
Advantages of having a good dictator?
Read the story of Francisco Franco, dictator of Spain. See if you think he was beneficial to their nation. The only advantage I have ever seen about a country having a dictator is that the people know whose boss and they know what to expect. But, is not much of an advantage if you ask me. Most dictators historically have been positively awful.
See link below.
