Three
. How should the different types of medical wastes be handled
Do you know who is alfredo panizo who give principles about human acts?
who cites these principles:
1. A person is held morally responsible for any evil effect whichflows from the action directly willed.
An ethical situation or more usually an ethical dilemma is one in which there is a conflict within oneself about what to do based on his personal ethics. Generally it pits two competing principles against each other. For example, a paramedic may not want to move a traffic collision victim out of a car due to suspicion of spinal injury but he also knows that the car is on fire and the fire is getting close to the gas tank. So, he must make a choice in regard to his ethic of doing no harm to the victim by not potentially injuring his spine further causing permanent paralysis and his ethic of not letting someone come to harm due to his inaction as his delay in moving the victim could cause due to the fire and possible explosion.
Does this help? If you had some other question you were trying to ask, feel free to drop me a line and I will gladly offer further input.
it is important
The principle of equal treatment is the idea that a moral theory should treat all people equally, unless there is a morally relevant reason not to. In other words all people should follow a certain moral code unless there is a morally relevant reason that they should be exempt.
Ethical egoism is the idea that you should always act in accordance to what is in your own self interest. In other words an ethical egoist holds themselves in their own highest regards - in a sense discriminating against all persons but themselves. This is for no other reason aside "I am myself, and therefore look out for myself only". Depending on your point of view, the mere idea of "I am me" may not be considered a morally relevant reason to treat yourself differently.
Ttechnology has opportunity to serve the needs and yet fulfill desires of status, power, popularity, envy, etc.
Choices should be based upon the best possible need or requirement without regard to emotional wants, money, favorites, trends, desires and allowing no excuses in the decision making process, whether it be a teenager and the latest cell phone or a country developing high tech war technology.
What does living from moment to moment imply?
The term "living moment to moment" implies that you should not worry about the future and just live each day as it passes. Worrying can take away from the excitement of life.
No autonomy doesn't allow you to harm yourself or others because based on the principles of the Golden Rule you treat others as you want to be treated. This means you can't cause harm to others.
amoral
What is the principle of solidarity and subsidiarity?
Priciple of Subsidiarity
* pagpapahalaga ng mga higher society sa lower society.
* pagbibigay ng kalayaan ng higher society sa lower society ng paunlarin nito ang sarili nito at bumuo ng mga grupo ng tutulong sa kanyang paunlarin ang sarili nito
What are the Hindu views on taking revenge?
Since Hindu beliefs work on the principle of Karma, taking revenge would mean, you will be stuck in the endless cycle of death and birth. When take revenge, the outcome of that is certainlynot good for the other person.So you will take another birth, to suffer for your deeds. Hence, the principle of karma would imply that we need to lead a life of content and peace.
Since Hindu beliefs work on the principle of Karma, taking revenge would mean, you will be stuck in the endless cycle of death and birth. When take revenge, the outcome of that is certainlynot good for the other person.So you will take another birth, to suffer for your deeds. Hence, the principle of karma would imply that we need to lead a life of content and peace.
BUT I HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW-Hinduism of Vedic and Dravida types sanction revenge if an act of harm is done towards one without provocation. Violence if just is fully supported by religion. Krishna told Arjuna at battle-field that if revenge comes as a part of one's duty then there is no wrong in it. What is written above does not fit with Sanatana Dharma's views.
Is there anything morally wrong and why is it wrong?
yes, there is.
Some would argue that the taking of life (killing someone) is morally wrong.
A counter-argument might be if in self-defence, the taking of a life might be morally right, since it preserves another's life.
However, this does not contradict the point that the taking of a life is still morally wrong. Indeed, the taking of a life can be both morally right and morally wrong.
Just be completely honest and be yourself. Don't try to be anything else and answer truthfully.
In what sense are human acts deliberate?
Human acts considered deliberate when the attributes were all present.
What are the core values of professional excellence?
Some of the core values of professional excellence are integrity, accountability, and compassion.
The leaders should always ensure that they address the need for ethical behavior, legal regulatory requirements and social justice.
What are the tree elements of a morality tale?
A morality tale typically includes three key elements: a moral lesson, a relatable protagonist, and a conflict or challenge that illustrates the moral. The protagonist often faces a dilemma that tests their values, leading to a resolution that highlights the consequences of their choices. This structure aims to convey ethical teachings and encourage reflection on right and wrong behaviors.
Is a good name more important than the truth?
"Who steals my purse steals trash; 'tis something, nothing; 'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to thousands; But he that filches from me my good name robs me of that which not enriches him, and makes me poor indeed." - William Shakespeare, "Othello"
In the long run, your good name is dependent on all of the truths you have lived. It is painful to admit to an error, theft or to any behavior you might regret at the time, but by serving the consequences your life will be more positive and ethical. I am sure that many of the politicians of our times wish that past acts and choices were not lingering for media to discover and spin into negative news.