Human Rights

yes it is also a sir name of valmikis .........in valmiki cast gill is also a sir name or a gotr

The image of Lady Justice with a blindfold over her eyes represents the theory of "blind justice;" i.e. that nothing, such as money, influence, fame, etc., should influence a correct judgment. Symbolically, if whomever is deciding your fate can't see you because they're blindfolded, in this case Lady Justice, then they have no choice but to base their decision strictly on facts and thus cast judgment objectively. This theory is wrong. The blindfold is a latecomer and means what anybody wants it to mean. For millennia there was no blindfold. You must consider all the equipment depicted in the lady's surrounding such as the scales, the rumpled clothes, and especially the sword including her seated position on planet earth. I say there should be no blindfold since from the beginning she weighed the evidence with wide open eyes to then use her sword to draw quarts of blood equal to what the culprit drained from the victim so she could enforce the 2nd half of Newton's 3rd law of motion. Remember she is enforcing that law thousands of years before Newton's abstraction of 1687. It was always there but waiting on him to express it in obedience to Occam's Razor of 1350 AD. But you must know that even prior which in the year 0032 AD another man stated at Mathew 2:7 "with what measure ye mete(2nd Law), it shall be measured to you again (3rd Law)." This statement is the first available prestatement of Newton's science of 1687. Here still by statue of prior depiction was art prestating Newton's words still to come. The earliest such statue was about 700 B.C. and was done to impress the universe of onlookers that what the statue depicted was the goal of proceedings taking place as the public watched the head of the clan administer public justice by inflicting equal harm on the designated culprit. Any questions? Kyle Ballard on 12-13-14

Civil rights are a class of rights that protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social organizations, and private individuals. They ensure one's entitlement to participate in the civil life of society and the state without discrimination or repression.

lewistonidaho

Different countries in the world such as saudi araibia, Iraq, afghanistan, sudan, and libya. There are many more countries that don't follow the Universal Declaration of human rights.

Also, different countries don't follow different articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Yes, although the doctor must inform the patient and is still the patient's caregiver until the patient transfers to another caregiver or sufficient time has passed to do so. These concepts are rather vague. Here are some examples: * A doctor cannot voluntarily leave a patient in the middle of an operation if she expects to not spend time in court or before a review board. * A doctor may notifiy the patient through a reliable and verifiable source (registered mail is a favorite) that they will cease treatment of the patient in a reasonable amount of time (1 week to 1 month is probably good), and that the patient much seek help elsewhere. * If the doctor has reason to fear for life or limb from actions the patient may undertake, the doctor is not required to expose herself to a combative patient. However, notification is still required. * The doctor is encouraged to terminate care of a patient they lack the requisite expertise to treat. Again, this would be documented. * At this time, in America, a doctor out of the office is not required to treat a stranger in extremis.

normally, when you buy a product that was produced in a LEDC (less economically developed country) barely any of the money goes to the farmer. fair trade makes it so most of the money goes to the producer, and not the sellers, this means that they can afford to support their families. Maybe if enough products become fairtrade, a village could afford a tap, to supply them with clean, fresh water, without walking for miles each day.

Already owned slaves were permitted, otherwise no slaves allowed in the state of Texas.

There are no disadvantages of human rights. Human rights only have advantages. Human rights are a standard of principles for all people to not be restrained from what is justified as essential for quality living by virtue of being human.

Equal opportunities are important in society and the public services because we are all people and as such we should all have the same rights and opportunities regardless of age, race, gender, sexuality or cultural background. Without equality of opportunity we cannot progress as a society. It is important that we feel that there is no difference between ourselves and anybody else.

By Lisandro C.

In the past societies treated people very baldy, there was no such thing as universal suffrage, governments were elitist and tyrannical and slavery was a common practice the world over.

After centuries of campaigning and with the support of the major world religions, eventually a charter of what humans should expect of each other and the societies in which they live was drawn up and agreed by all nations.

This charter is called:- "The Universal Declaration of Human Rites" (see related links below).

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was a world-wide, international declaration between the Member States of the United Nations, proclaiming their views on human rights.

-----------------------

Societies are however beginning to see the rites given under the declaration as a little one sided, and many now feel that while the declaration is fine in what it espouses, what is also needed is a balancing declaration of human responsibilities because the two go hand in hand. This would enable courts to balance the application of rites against an individuals discharge of their responsibilities.

Human Rights Watch is non-profit organization based in New York. It conducts research on human rights around the world. Human Rights Watch opposes violations of human rights. The organization monitors different countries and reports misconducts.

No. Human rights are not in danger of being taken away by the United States government unless we consider one particular area. That is the concerted efforts of certain political groups that are constantly trying to affect health issues that concern only women by trying to pass laws that affect only women's health issues and their right to control their own bodies.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

freedom of speech

freedom of press

freedom of religion

freedom of assembly

freedom of representation

Kidnapping.

The right to overthrow oppressive governments is not a right addressed by the universal declaration human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is generally agreed to be the foundation of international human rights law.

that we are willing to help anywhone anytime

No country is required to sign the Geneva Convention.

but it is expected that a country will

No not without parental permission. If the mother of the friend is willing to accept responsibility for you, she can petition the court for legal guardianship. However, your parent(s) will have the right to contest the action and it must be proven to the satisfaction of the court that it would be in your best interest to grant the guardianship. Unless there is substanial evidence of abuse and/or neglect in the parental home, a judge would NOT terminate parental rights and grant custody to someone else. If you believe yourself to be in an abusive or neglectful situation you should contact the Department of Social Services in your city or county. Or call any of the following numbers for guidance and assistance, National Child Abuse Hotline 1-800-392-3738, Youth Crisis Services 1-800-448-4463, Youth Emergency Service 1-800-899-5437. You might like to vist the web site Teenline Online, which is staffed by teens helping other teens without criticism. http://www.teenlineonline.org

"Duty of care" is the duty in exercising caution and to refrain from causing injury or loss to another person.

In tort law, a duty of care is a legal obligation imposed upon an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of "reasonable care" while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others."

Human rights are important because if you didn't have them, then your life would be controlled by the government or by somebody else and if you didn't have the right to do your own thing, then you wouldn't be able to and it would be controlled. They entitle people to have freedom, equality and respect to control their lives. We fight for our rights and obey the rules and regulation.