Political Theory

Because he did not see Russian Capitalism as sufficiently mature compared to the European Capitalism.

It was not until 1861 that Russia abolished serfdom, which formalized its move from Feudalism to Capitalism.

Marx, who first published Das Kapital in 1867, saw Russian politico-economic system as a hybrid between Feudalism and Capitalism. He believed in a natural progression of political systems from Feudalism to Capitalism to Communism, with Capitalism being more progressive that Feudalism, and Communism more progressive than Capitalism. Each system, according to Marx, was intended to resolve the conflicts of the previous system, mature, run its course, create its own conflicts, which, when they came to a breaking point, would result in the next system change.

He saw the class conflicts in Germany and England as more pronounced and promising than those in Russia. If the proletariat (working class) was the engine of the next revolution, he figured, how could the Russian nascent proletariat be ready for it?

Of course, Russian revolution was anything but Marxist.

"Marxism" neither precedes nor succeeds communism, since they are two different concepts. Marxism is an ideology based on all of the theories of Karl Marx. Communism is an economic and political system. According to Karl Marx, socialism precedes and eventually evolves into communism. The idea that socialism will evolve into communism is only one of the aspects of the ideology known as Marxism. There are many more aspects to "Marxism" than just socialism and communism.

Marx and Engels viewed history as a series of class struggles, with societal development driven by conflicts between opposing economic classes. They believed that history was shaped by material conditions and the struggle for power between the ruling class (bourgeoisie) and the working class (proletariat). They argued that the ultimate goal of history was the establishment of a classless society based on common ownership of the means of production.

There are many potential reasons why Marx's concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat did not materialize as he envisioned. Some possible factors include the rise of other political ideologies, the varying interpretations and implementations of Marxist theory by different leaders and movements, and societal and economic conditions that may not have aligned with Marx's predictions. Additionally, the complex nature of governance and revolutionary movements can lead to divergent outcomes from what was initially envisioned.

The first step was to have an agricutural revolution. This was where a country could gain food and a stable economy. Second there needed to be a industrial revolution. This was the factory and mechanical part that lead to a capitalist society. (Like America) Next, there needed to be a bloody revolution, in which the coomon people would rise up and take control of their oppressors. After that, there would be a socialist government with some government control. Finally the govenment would fade because it was not needed and become a communist society.

He believed that the proletariat (the masses) would seize control of the means of production. This belief, according to Marx is indisputable and scientific. It is a process, according to Marx, that cannot be altered based on his studies in human history and practical economics. Marx did not take into account true human history. Class struggle is not the only means by which history develops.

1. a member of the Communist party or movement.

2. an advocate of communism.

3. a person who is regarded as supporting politically leftist or subversive causes.

4. a Communard.

5. of or pertaining to the Communist party or to Communism.

6. pertaining to communists or communism.

Communism is a socio-economic system where the means of production are owned and controlled by the community as a whole, rather than by individual owners. It aims for a classless society where resources are distributed based on need, not profit.

Press is actually media which spreads news to the larger public.they play a very important role in the aspect of democracy.The public have all the rights to know about the outside world based on legislature,executive and all aspects of government. This should be clearly understood.This important work is done by the press. They publish the news from all over the world to a small area in a village. therefore, the press is the lighthouse of democracy which guides people and spreads the news all over large public.

all of you are extremely dumb, the answer is dictatorship of the proletariat, for apex.

In America, the single most dramatic contrast between liberals and conservatives is basic philosophy. Liberals believe that people are like sheep and are too stupid to run their own lives correctly, so the government should run every detail of citizens' lives. They think that freedom is dangerous. They believe that the govt. should make all the choices regarding how peoples' money should be allocated. To learn more about the liberal agenda, study Karl Marx, and the history of the USSR from 1917 up to the mid-eighties. Conservatives believe in personal freedom, minimal government interference in the lives of citizens, and the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution. Reference the Federalist Papers and other texts. To find more info on this topic, go to http://www.gunlaws.com

Many political scientists have referred to states in the United States as "laboratories of democracy." This term reflects the idea that individual states can experiment with different policies and serve as testing grounds for innovative ideas and approaches to governance. It emphasizes the ability of states to adapt and learn from each other's successes and failures in order to improve public policy.

The three Ms of campaigning typically refer to Message, Money, and Mobilization. Message is about crafting a clear and persuasive communication strategy to connect with voters and articulate policy positions. Money refers to the funds needed for advertising, staff, and other campaign expenses. Mobilization involves building a strong grassroots network and mobilizing supporters to get out the vote and engage in campaign activities.

If it calls for a 9 inch springform pan which holds about 10 cups one may use: 1 (10-inch) round cake pan 1 (10-inch) springform pan 2 (8-inch) round cake pans 2 (9-inch) round cake pans If it call dor a 10 inch springform pan which holds about 12 cups one may use: 2 (8 x 4-inch) loaf pans 1 (9-inch) tube pan 2 (9-inch) round cake pans 1 (10-inch) Bundt pan 2 (11 x 7-inch) baking dishes 2 (8-inch) round cake pans

All those who have to work for wages, i.e. have to sell their labour power to an employer in return for a wage.

Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party brought "communism" to Russia in 1917 through the October Revolution. It should be noted that true communism was never instituted in Russia (or in any other country for that matter). The revolution brought a socialist state to Russia. The theory was that socialism would eventually evolve into communism generations later. It never did.

According to Machiavelli, a prince gains renown through his actions, such as successful military conquests, wise governance, and the ability to manipulate public opinion. The effects of gaining renown include increased power, loyalty from subjects, and deterrence of potential adversaries, leading to a more stable rule for the prince.

Without looking at his record it is hard to say for sure, but given that he was appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush and is a former Navy Jag attourney, he likely leans conservative.

Most people don’t have a choice, as capitalism forced on them by the ruling class.

Your implication is that America is trending toward socialism, which is your own opinion and not supported by facts.

If you are not happy living as an American under the American system of government, you could either become involved, or move to another country and apply for citizenship there.

yes ,its true but it depends on country people who are ruling.

Anarchy is a condition where there is no government. Also the term is used when it seems that there is no law and order.

The Republicans were able to take control of both houses of Congress.