Scientific Method

experimental and control groups

it help alot otherwise the world would finish till now from disease of malaria

... Sigh. America. How ashamed i am of thee sometimes...

First of all, there are no two people who are exactly alike in looks. Its physically impossible, even for identical twins, to not have an outstanding feature from the other (One Twin may be taller, or more commonly, have freckles or moles in different places than their sibling)

Second of all, If you really think physical appearance determines intrests/activities/taste, then you are shallow. Each human being is unique in that you have a soul, whether you believe in a greater power or not (Personally, i am an athiest) you have a soul, and the decisions, the intrests, the realtionships and connections that you have shape your soul into a unique body. The Idea of Perfectly (Mentally) Identical Twins is... Orwellian. No two people on this earth are the same, whether it be by looks, intrests, taste, or any other human attribute. Its the beauty of life, that each being is in and of itself a beautiful, completly unique person.

Think Snow Flakes.

Now, please Go to your local Library and read a book, preferably not one involving large text and pictures -_-

Coughx

yes because you need to always remember the 7 rules of safety in case of a emergency

The scientific method is a way explore questions, it is not a way to 'fix' anything.

A kaleidoscope is a device made of (usually three) mirrors facing each other. In most cases, some small, sparkly matter is put in a slide on the end. Anything on the end is reflected by the mirrors, and the mirrors reflect each other, repeating the image over and over.

A hypothesis is a statement of fact or belief upon which further conclusions can be drawn.

An inference is the meaning that I attribute to someone else's statement or action.

There is no experiment or possible evidence that could prove that invisible snorgs do not exist. So the Snorg Hypothesis is not scientific. On the other hand, the "Negative Snorg Hypothesis" (that they do not exist) is scientific. You can disprove it by catching one.

C o 2 carbon dioxide

Do you mean you are thinking of forming an hypothesis, gathering quantitative data, and testing it somehow? I have to say that seems like an odd approach to studying the Bible. Or do you simply mean forming questions and then looking for the answers in the Bible? I suppose that would be what the "scientific method" really is about, to state it simply. Well, a scientific approach also should keep personal bias and subjective observations out of the equation, so to speak. That would actually be very beneficial in studying the Bible, I think. You wouldn't go into it with a preconceived intent to discredit it, as it seems some scientifically-inclined individuals have done.

Something I would like to point out about the Bible is that it was obviously not written to be a science textbook. It was written to be understood by people from all levels of learning, from all cultures, all types of people. To me, that is part of its genius.

However, when it does touch on scientific matters it is actually quite factual, matching up with proven science.

Oswald Avery and his associates followed several key steps of the scientific method in their transformation experiments. They began by making observations about the effects of heat-killed pathogenic bacteria on non-pathogenic strains. They formed a hypothesis that a substance from the heat-killed bacteria was responsible for transforming the non-pathogenic bacteria into pathogenic forms. Through systematic experimentation, they isolated and purified DNA, demonstrating that it was the transforming principle, thus supporting their hypothesis with empirical evidence.

Organizational culture is a pretty hard thing to define, much less assess it's current problems, issues and opportunities. Let's start with a definition: Organizational culture consists of the actions, behaviors, systems, values and beliefs that persist over time. Please note that "persistent" also implies hard to change. There are volumes and volumes written on assessing (or diagnosing) organizational culture. Some of those references are below. There are three main methods of assessing organizational culture: archival methods, that use historical data, such as absenteeism, turnover, customer relations and retention, productivity records, etc.; The second is to gather information via surveys, whether they be numerical surveys, open-ended surveys, or some combination of both; and observation, where a consultant systematically observes meetings, discussions, individuals, etc. Usually a combination of all three will allow you to "triangulate" and come up with a thorough assessment of culture. Some of the books below will help. In addition, there are a couple of articles on websites that summarize much of the information. They are included in the web link to this article. Some references: Organizational Dynamics: Diagnosis and Intervention (Addison-Wesley Series on Organization Development) by John P. Kotter Organizational Diagnosis and Assessment: Bridging Theory and Practice by Michael Harrison and Arie Shirom Diagnosis for Organizational Change: Methods and Models by Ann Howard and and Associates No More Darn Buzzwords: Keys to Successful Organized Change. David Chaudron. PhD

Aristotle

Publishing your findings is useful in communicating your results, which happens to be the last step in the scientific method.

Mosquito spray includes repellants and poisons to kill the mosquito. The chemicals are highly toxic for the insect but not so toxic for humans.

A little machine called a glucometer. It measures your blood sugar. It's for diabetics to test themselves at home.

I'm not a plumber, but I would look for an adjustable inline water pressure regulator

Spiritualism is the human realization of his origin , existence and objective of his goal,not as an individual or community in convictions that have no no scientific basis in theology,but by the analysis of creation through scientific variables and principles science in the paradigm shifts in the scientific principles itself for the human race.

scientific method

4 oz fresh finely-cut leaf with 1 pint of brandy, gin or vodka. Plant parts should be covered. Mascerate for 2 weeks, shaking several time each day. Strain and store. And more . . .

This happens because gravity pulls you down but the oxygen and air in your lungs and body help you stay afloat. This creates a bobbing motion.