0
Imperialism
One country extending power and dominance over another country or area is known as Imperialism. Based on ideas of superiority and authority, dominance is achieved through direct territorial acquisition or gaining economic control over an area.
3,604 Questions
Can you help a sentence with the word colonize?
the colonization of America lead to the huge country there is now
France colonized Chad until its independence on August 11th 1960.
Which of these is the best description of imperialism?
a country focusing on its affairs within its own borders
A+LS: a foreign policy of territorial expansion beyond the borders of a country
Was Rhodesia a British colony?
Rhodesia was a British colony until the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in 1964. The country again reverted to colonial status as part of a ceasefire agreement from 1979 until Robert Mugabe was brought into power in the 1980 elections, at which point, it transitioned into the Republic of Zimbabwe.
How was European imperialism in Africa similar to imperialism in Asia?
European imperialism was motivated by a desire for economic gains in both regions.
What argument did Fredrick Jackson turner make to justify American imperialism?
Turner said that colonial expansion served the purpose that the frontier had for earlier Americans.
What were the European nation that DID NOT participate in the colonization of Africa?
Switzerland did not colonise Africa.
How did imperialism take over Hawaii?
Hawaii The Age of Imperialism. The U.S. first got involved in 1875 when a treaty was signed between the U.S. and Hawaii. ... Instead, the U.S. waited 5 years until they set up a second treaty of annexation with the new Hawaiiangovernment. On July 7th, 1898, the U.S. annexed Hawaii due to war needs.
What European country colonized Hispaniola?
France in 1674. Annexation see-sawed between the English and the French (and Sweden for 13 months) until the Treaty of Vienna was signed in 1851, acknowledging the sovereignty of the French over Guadeloupe.
What was imperialism in the 1800?
Imperialism in the 1800s was a policy where powerful nations expanded their influence and control over weaker regions through colonization, economic dominance, and military force. Major European powers, such as Britain, France, and Germany, sought to acquire territories in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific, driven by the desire for resources, markets, and strategic advantage. This era was marked by the Scramble for Africa and significant impacts on local populations, including cultural imposition, exploitation, and resistance movements. The effects of 19th-century imperialism laid the groundwork for global political dynamics and conflicts in the 20th century.
What are the results of colonization?
It made them forget who they really were. They had to change their lifestyles.
The Ethiopians bought Western arms primarily from Britain and Italy and aligned themselves politically with Russia and France. As a result, they were able to bring four times the forces to bear as the Italians and were able to force them back.
Why did Spain colonize in Venezuela?
During the Age of Exploration, Portugal and Brazil were both very strong colonizing powers. The reason that they colonized Brazil was because they could. At the time, land and wealth went hand in hand, and they wanted access to whatever potential natural resources were in Brazil (at the time, people seemed to think there were just ridiculous stores of gold all over the New World).
If you're asking why they wouldn't go any further, it's because of a decree by the Pope at the time. Spain and Portugal were both colonizing parts of South America at the time, and they were having arguments about who had claims to what, and what was fair for who to colonize. They took it to the Pope, and the Pope drew a line on a map- at a time when the charts of the new world were still incomplete. Portugal could colonize to the east of that line, and Spain could colonize to the west of it.
What idea was used to justify European imperialism in Asia and Africa?
Social Darwinism is a idea that is similar to survival of the fittest. They used this idea to and divide preexisting areas or territories.
Marxist approach to study of colonialism and nationalism in India?
The Marxist View:
They conceptualise the nation as an aggregate of internally differentiated classes and underlined the contradictions between the bourgeoise and the proletariat class. Historian Marxists like Rajni Palme Dutt and A.R.Desai talked about the classes of peasants and workers, their role and people in the history.
They saw colonialism as a way of capturing the raw materials of the colony and refuted the arguments of colonialism as being 'Civilising Mission'. They tried to explain the nationalist movement in terms of economic developments of the colonial period, the rise of capitalism and the development of market society in India.
According to them the National Movement was led by bourgeoise class and they directed it to suit their own interests and neglected the interests of the masses. They also believed that even the Congress party was comprised of big landlords and industrialists who were seeking their own interest out of this movement. They highlighted heterogeneity in the Indian society in terms of class and castes, and viewed both colonialism and nationalism as structurally incapable of fulfilling the task of modernization of these disadvantaged sections in the colonies.
Sumit Sarkar in his book, 'Modern India' argued that there were two levels of anti-imperialist struggle in India - One was Elite and the other was Populist, and understanding of Indian history demands the study of both.
Lenin v/s M.N.Roy: According to Lenin, the independence movements rising throughout Asia, led by the colonial middle class and bourgeoise were movements of oppressed nations attempting to throw off the yoke of oppressors. However Roy had a different opinion as he thought that Congress and its leaders were bourgeoise and proletariat should not support them. For him, nationalism could not lead to the overthrow of capitalism. Therefore working class should also place its own class demands and if possible should establish a Workers' State.
Criticism:
This approach to the nationalism was not a balanced one. For them, the society could be divided into only two classes- the 'proletariat' and the 'bourgeoise'. This class based division ignored the presence of different castes, religions and communities but for a proper analysis, divisions based on them were also important.
They neglected the contribution made by the elites and the intelligentsia to the national movement by arguing that they were self-interested. In this way, they also neglected the political organizations formed by them.
They also didn't appreciated the 'non-voilent' character of the national movement. They were revolutionary in nature and didn't give that much importance to the ideology of 'Ahimsa' supported by Gandhiji and their followers.
What does the excerpt suggest about European imperialism during the late 19th-century?
You need to answer this question because we don’t have the excerpt nor do we do homework. Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills.
How did Imperialism lead to exploration?
I'm afraid it did not, you can argue that the Age of Exploration helped to create imperialism in the form we know it today. Although imperialism has been around for thousands of years, it wasn't until the 1700's that imperialism really started to have an effect.
What event in the play best parallels the practices of colonization?
Prospero uses Ariel for his magical abilities, which are a part of the island's resources
Prospero arrives on the island and kills Sycorax, a witch who opposes him.
