Dmitri Mendeleev developed two main themes in his textbook "The Principles of Chemistry": the concept of periodicity, which led to the creation of the periodic table of elements; and the idea that the properties of elements are dependent on their atomic weights, leading to the organization of elements into groups and periods based on their atomic mass and properties.
Does everyone have an Adams apple?
Yes, women can have adams apples, but they are smaller then mens!
They do it's just not as visible as men's
Yes.
The "Adam's Apple" is the cartilage of the larynx located on the front of the throat. It is more prominent in men but women have them too.
In my knowledge, the microorganisms lived first on earth.
A list of some known dinosaurs.
Note that there are actually over 700 species of discovered dinosaurs. Only 540 of them currently have official names. The others are awaiting naming.
There are also at least a further 900-1500 species that are currently undiscovered in the Earth's crusts or will never be discovered due to their fossils being destroyed completely by human activity or Earth's surface changes.
The Adam's apple is a protrusion on the front of the neck caused by the thyroid cartilage surrounding the larynx or voice box. It is more prominent in males due to hormonal differences and helps protect the vocal cords.
Sin can create feelings of guilt, shame, and separation from others and from one's values or beliefs. It can also lead to negative consequences in relationships, mental health, and overall well-being. Addressing sin through acknowledgment, repentance, and seeking forgiveness can help restore inner peace and connection with one's values.
What was the Adam's apple named after?
the Adams apple is named as so because biblicaly in the story of Adam and eve when Adam ate the apple some of it got stuck down his throat so all men hav a ball in there throat known as the larynx and if you touch it, it feels like an apple so that is why its called that hope i helped
The story of Adam and Eve in religious texts is symbolic rather than literal. In reality, the concept of all people being connected to one another through distant ancestors is true due to evolution, but it doesn't imply direct incest among all individuals. Genetic diversity has been maintained through generations, preventing the harmful effects of inbreeding.
Meaning of Respect for the Dignity of Human Sexuality?
Respecting the dignity of human sexuality involves recognizing that each person's sexuality is an integral part of their identity and should be treated with honor, fairness, and understanding. It involves acknowledging the fundamental rights and autonomy of individuals in expressing their sexuality, free from discrimination, coercion, or harm. It also involves promoting positive and healthy attitudes towards sexuality that prioritize consent, safety, and mutual respect in relationships.
== == Adam and Eve obviously came first! It says in the Bible that Adam was the first man and Eve was the first woman. God created them making them the first people on earth or better said, the origin of all human kind. === === The cave men were most likely those who, in the post Babel dispersion, were forced to temporarily use caves for shelter and protection from wild animals. Some groups would also have not necessarily had the technology for building structures and so were forced to live in caves. So, as above, Adam and Eve certainly came first.The use of caves would certainly have been a temporary expedient, until more suitable shelter was either constructed or ability to construct developed. There are a number of problems with the suggested dates for human evolution and the development of agriculture, for example, which do not square with what we know of history and the actual evidence. The idea of cave men is, at least in the popular mind, connected with the idea that such were evolving into the humankind as we know it today, as they were not yet 'clever' enough to build houses or structures. The actual evidence that is found, however, indicates that humans have always been humans, with evidence of culture and sophistication, such as complex musical instruments, burial customs, and art. Thus, it is clear that Adam and Eve came first.
The term "cavemen" is a bit of a misnomer. Very few of the early hominids lived in caves. The popular view of caveman probably started in the 17th century, nowadays Neanderthals and Cro-magnon might be thought of as "cavemen" - of course it can be argued that prehistoric remains are much more likely to survive in caves that outside, so it can't be assumed that caves were common shelters. The earliest homo sapien fossils date from over 100,000 years BCE. The, somewhat confusing, calculations for the date of Adam and Eve dates them at around 4000 BCE. So if you accept the existence of a historical Adam & Eve, they postdate the earliest humans by many thousands of years. Who came first? Gee...that's not a very hard question. As mentioned above, I also know that Adam and Eve came first but there is also the posobility that Adam was a caveman himself after been pushed out of the garden of eden. Now, I will never know for sure, but there is always that possibility. Your call! :) The whole crux of this answer is how you interpret Genesis and the Adam and Eve story. Fundamental creationists will have us believe that the universe was created just 6000 years ago or so with Adam and Eve being created on the sixth day, because it says so in Genesis. Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary from the geological record, archaeology, ice core analysis and so on, the absolute scientific truth of Genesis is still postulated by Creationists who will not accept scientific evidence for the universe being a great deal (13 billion years?) older despite the overwhelming bank of evidence that suggests this. Often bizarre theories and couterarguments are postulated by them, most of which invoke pseudo-science and reduce Christians to laughing stocks. Sadly, within society those who would attack Christianity (such as the likes of Richard Dawking) latch on to this absurdity and then extrapolate this to the whole of Christianity - an 'if these Christians believe this rubbish then they are stupid - therefore there is no God' attitude. And, of course, Christians know that this is far from the truth. But the truth is that Genesis was never ever meant to be a scientific report on how the universe, and the earth, were created. As scripture, of course, it was inspired as the Word of God, but this does not mean that it should be taken absolutely literally. The same Creationists who accept Genesis as totally literal will also indict, say, Jehovah's Witnesses who take Revelation literally stating that only 144.000 will be saved because 'that is what it says in the Bible'. One cannot have one's cake and eat it. It also states two Creation stories in the Bible, which show some contradiction of each other - one in genesis Chapter 1, and the other in Genesis Chapter 2. Many Biblical scholars regard these being written by two different authors the 'Yahwist' (God-centred - where God is regarded as an aloof deity) author and a 'Priestly' (more human-centred, where God can walk and talk with humans) author. Some scholars regard these two stories as a foretaste of the Trinity and others as two different sources written at different times, by different people, with different agendas. The Hebrew word used in Genesis for 'day' (yom) has several meanings - one common meaning being a 'period of time'. It just so happened that in the earlier translations of Genesis the term 'day' was used. The idea of the 7 periods of time (rather than just 'days) is reinforced by the themes of 7 running through the Old testament - 7 days in the week with the 7th day being a day of rest, 7 years of crop growing with the 7th year with the ground being laid fallow, in the 7th year of slavery (the Jubillee year or sabbatical year) the slaves go free and so on. It is interesting to note that Genesis describes the order of Creation in these 7 periods of time (the universe, the solar system, seas, life in water, life on land, culminating in humanity) in total accordance with the scientific evidence, evidence which the writer (or writers) of Genesis (whether Moses or not) would not have privy knowledge unless Genesis was truly inspired by God the Creator in the first place. But note that the 'day' mentioned in Genesis was 'created' before the earth and sun - and so a normal 'day' as we would know it would not exist unless the earth had been already revolving in a 24 hour period. So the idea of 'day' as a 24 hour period is not in accordance with a universe created in a day - when the very mechanism that produces days had not yet been created. Next, look at Adam. The name 'Adam' means 'man' or 'mankind'. The name 'Eve' means 'from man'. This indicates that Adam and Eve are to represent the whole of humanity - a theme that runs throughout the Bible - and because of their turning away from God brought sin and death into the world. Unlike the animals, God made (hu)man in his own image. And yet, in the New Testament (John 4:24), we read that Jesus says God is spirit and not a human or physical form (hence Jesus' appearance on earth). So Adam, if he existed as a real person, was the first creature to be given a spiritual dimension - to be formed in the image of God. Let's forget about trees and apples for a minute (and the 'apple' doesn't get a mention anyway - it's the 'Fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil'!) and look at the whole picture. In the picturesque language that Genesis Adam, through Eve, rebels against God, and the spiritual bond between God and humans is broken. So, in Genesis we have a lesson in our own failings. God creates a universe, a world called earth, life is allowed to flourish, and humans become the pinnacle of that creation. These humanoid creatures are intelligent (just look at Stonehenge and Avebury in the UK and Newgrange in Ireland), gregarious, cultured and prolific in everything they do - but they are still animals in a sense as they lack their spiritual dimension. God creates then the first humans to have a spiritual dimension - and, in doing so, creates creatures in his own image, holy, and lacking sin. Instead of homo sapiens, let's call them "homo spiritualis" - spiritual man. But these creatures rebel, turn away from their creator and go their own way because they think they know best. Not only physical death is in the world - after all it has been there since life was created - but spiritual death enters too now. As Jesus himself said, we should not fear him who destroys the body, but we should fear him who destroys the soul (Matt 10:28). Incidentally many Creationists will also equate the devil with Satan and that, as a result of their disobedience Adam and Eve die. However, nowhere in the Genesis story is the devil mentioned. The serpent is talked of as the most cunning creature - but never equated with the devil nor assumed to be the devil. Also, no one dies in the story. No one is punished by death. Adam is punisd by being cast out of the garden and made to work tilling the soil for a living. Eve is punished by the ppains of childbirth and subservience to Adam. The first death we hear of is the murder of Abel by his brother Cain - death not at the hand of God, but by the hand of a fallen human. This must show one thing - God does not wish to punish by death - but for sinful humans murder, even in those days, is an all-too-frequent occurrence. So, to conclude, 'cavemen' as such (althoough there is little evidence many of them actually lived in caves), I believe, evolved as humanoid creatures many thousands of years ago. But, if there was a person called Adam, he may well have been the first spiritual human, created in God's own spiritual image, who appeared on earth possibly much later. But let's not get hung up on the literality of the creation stories of Genesis as they were never meant to be taken absolutely literally anyway. To read Genesis just as a literal story denudes it of the great truths hidden within the words - and sadly this is very much what literal Creationists do. Forget cavemen, forget Adam and Eve. The facts and truths that Genesis thunders out, if we would only see them, are that we are all made in the image of God, that we rebelled, and that spiritual death entered the world not long before we were given the chance of eternal life. In oother words, we blew it. Enter Jesus Christ who, through his life, death and resurrection, made possible that restoration of the bond between God and those creatures whom he made in His own image, so long ago.
How do people begin taking succinamides?
When beginning a course of treatment that includes succinamides, most physicians recommend a gradual dose-increasing regimen. Patients typically take a reduced dose at the beginning of treatment.
The term "yowser" is a slang expression that originated in the United States in the early 20th century. It is often used to show excitement, surprise, or enthusiasm about something. The exact origin of the word is not well documented, but it has been used in various contexts in American English slang.
How long ago did man first develop on earth?
Scientists say that the first hominids evolved around seven million years ago, although we would probably not yet recongise these early ancestors as humans. A later ancestor, Homo habilis, evolved around 2 million years ago. We could begin to see ourselves in Homo habilis, although this species was still a long way from present man. Homo erectus evolved around 1.6 million years ago. Modern humans, Homo sapiens, are believed to have developed more than two hundred thousand years ago. At this early stage, humans had developed only a primitive lifestyle and culture, but anatomically and mentally they were little different to people on the street today.
Answer 2.
1. Judaeo-Christian Bible Prototype:
Man as Adam was placed in Eden on the third day - being explicated as the age before the forming of the cosmos on the fourth day - the following age.
Since Eden and Adam were formed before the physical world came into existence, they are of an empyreal nature.
The (NASA) estimated age of the cosmos is 13.77 billion years, and so Spiritual Adam or Man developed within empyreal Eden being on empyreal earth, over 13.77 billion years ago.
2. Cosmogony Prototype:
Man - predicated as an enlightened creature of the cosmos - was able to exist or develop on a cosmic earth or planet, from when the first stars and primordial galaxies were formed. Recent estimations have these as being formed between 300 million to 500 million years in the age of the cosmos, from when matter came into existence.
3. Our Planet Prototype:
Man, as an enlightened creature of this planet named Earth - first developed when the 'Man' genome was triggered, through epigenetic factors.
The threshold between dull beast and enlightened Man {written within wisdom scriptures of Prototype 1.are texts where one has the explication that at the time of conception, the soul of Man enters into the genome, and so Man is never beast, or bird, etc} would then be when genetic studies determine that Man was only breeding among their own evolved kind.
Studies showing that avenue of time are answered in an arbitrary manner, by the historical observation of manlike behavior constituting Man, among our early ancestors, those as given,(in the first answer).
Were the Homo erectus the first people on earth?
Homo erectus were the predecessors of our own species, Homo sapiens, so they certainly lived on earth before us. However, the predecessors to Homo erectus were a species known as Homo habilis (2.4 to 1.5 million years ago).
Then, depending on your definition of 'people', there were people even before Homo habilis - members of theAustralopithecus genus, going back more than 4 million years.
If the world started with Adam and Eve what does that make us all?
If the world started with Adam and Eve, then according to Christian belief, they are considered the first humans and thus are the ancestors of all humanity. This view is central to the creation story in the Bible, which states that all humans are descended from Adam and Eve.
The concept of Adam and Eve as the first humans is a religious belief and not a scientific fact. Human genetic diversity comes from a long history of migration, intermixing, and adaptation to different environments over thousands of years. Skin color variation is a result of genetic adaptation to different climates and UV exposure.
The story of Adam and Eve in the Bible is a religious story, not a literal account of human history or the origin of life on Earth. From a scientific perspective, human evolution occurred over millions of years through natural processes without extraterrestrial intervention. So, humans are not descendants of aliens in the literal sense.
Were Africans the first people on earth?
Yes, there is considerable scientific evidence to support this assertion. The oldest human fossils come from Africa, and it is unlikely that even older fossils will be found elsewhere. Supporting this is new DNA evidence, that indicates that the distant ancestors of all people alive today must have come from Africa.
How did archaeologists know that the two mummies were those of Adam and Eve?
A mummy was found that scientists determined was related to all dead and living members of the human species Homo sapiens. According to the book of Genesis, Eve was the world's first mother and Adam the world's first father. So the mummy was given the symbolic name of 'Eve'.
Who was the first man on the earth and what was his name?
Adam he was called Adam
According to the book of Genisis The first man alive was adam.
The first ever man alive was Adam. It was said in the Bible.
Answer:
For those who believe in the Bible, the first man was named Adam. For those who don't, the first man pre-dates the use of names, and so had no name.
adam and eve
Who was the first person to set foot on earth?
This depends on your definition of a person. The earliest man/woman or child to
hav evolved into what we now accept to be a human would have had no concept of what was happening nor have the ability to pass the infromation on, so this question can never be answered with 100% accuracy. Unless of course you are religious & want to believe your faith.
What did the first people on earth look like?
The appearance of the first people on earth is not definitively known, as it dates back to prehistoric times. However, based on scientific evidence and theories, it is believed they would have looked similar to modern-day humans but with some physical differences due to evolution and adaptation to their environment. These early humans likely had dark skin, hair covering most of their bodies, and a more robust physical build compared to contemporary humans.