How did Henry Vlll and Martin Luther change the Church?
Of course, King Henry VIII and Martin Luther were instrumental in the formation of the Protestant churches. This would not necessarily change the parent, Catholic Church but it did, in a way they could not have anticipated.
Prior to the Reformation, the Catholic Church had a spiritual monopoly in western Europe and could demand absolute allegiance. The creation of new and sustainable Churches protected by powerful kings and princes changed all this. There was no longer a universal monopoly, and the Catholic Church had to adapt to the new reality, which it did at an astonishingly slow pace.
The Catholic Church still held a spiritual monopoly in countries where Catholicism was the major faith, and it continued to exercise that monopoly. As recently as 1864, Pius IX published the Syllabus of Errors, stating that where Catholics are in the minority, they have the right to public worship, but where others faiths are in the minority, they have no right to public worship because only the true faith has the right to public worship.
Finally, in 1965, the Church came to the realisation that it would no longer be possible to force all people to believe and practise the one faith, even where Catholicism was the majority faith. The Second Vatican Council pronounced the right of all to religious liberty, recognising their right to worship in whatever way they wished. Almost five hundred years after the time of Henry VIII and Luther, the change was complete.
.
Catholic AnswerThe change that Henry VIII and Martin Luther contributed to, although unintentionally, was the Catholic reform which peaked with the Council of Trent, and continued for several centuries. A major result, again unintentional, was that the Church became to a certain extent insular and reactionary, fearful of the protestant heresies. And they both certainly gave a huge impetuous to education and missionary work whose prime example was the Society of Jesus, which came into existence primarily to fight the heresy brought about by Henry VIII and Martin Luther. Many Jesuits were martyred in England in the century beginning with Henry's apostasy..
from the Catholic Encyclopedia
The term Counter-Reformation denotes the period of Catholic revival from the pontificate of Pope Pius IV in 1560 to the close of the Thirty Years' War, 1648. The name, though long in use among Protestant historians, has only recently been introduced into Catholic handbooks. The consequence is that it already has a meaning and an application, for which a word with a different nuance should perhaps have been chosen. For in the first place the name suggests that the Catholic movement came after the Protestant; whereas in truth the reform originally began in the Catholic Church, and Luther was a Catholic Reformer before he became a Protestant. By becoming a Protestant Reformer, he did indeed hinder the progress of the Catholic reformation, but he did not stop it.
from A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, Second edition, revised 1957
The Counter-Reformation is the name given to the Catholic movement of reform and activity which lasted for about one hundred years from the beginning of the Council of Trent (q.v., 1545), and was the belated answer to the threatening confusion and increasing attacks of the previous years. It was the work principally of the Popes St. Pius V and Gregory XIII and the Council itself in the sphere of authority, of SS. Philip Neri and Charles Borromeo in the reform of the clergy and of life, of St. Ignatius and the Jesuits in apostolic activity of St. Francis Xavier in foreign missions, and of St. Teresa in the purely contemplative life which lies behind them all. But these were not the only names nor was it a movement of a few only; the whole Church emerged from the 15th century purified and revivified. On the other hand, it was a reformation rather than a restoration; the unity of western Christendom was destroyed; the Church militant (those still on earth) led by the Company of Jesus adopted offence as the best means of defence and, though she gained as much as she lost in some sense, the Church did not recover the exercise of her former spiritual supremacy in actuality.
from Modern Catholic Dictionary by John A. Hardon, S.J. Doubleday & Co., Inc. Garden City, NY 1980A period of Catholic revival from 1522 to about 1648, better know as the Catholic Reform. It was an effort to stem the tide of Protestantism by genuine reform within the Catholic Church. There were political movements pressured by civil rules, and ecclesiastical movements carried out by churchmen in an attempt to restore genuine Catholic life by establishing new religious orders such as the Society of Jesus and restoring old orders to their original observances, such as the Carmelites under St. Teresa of Avila (1515-98). The main factors responsible for the Counter Reformation, however, were the papacy and the council of Trent (1545-63). Among church leaders St. Charles Borromeo (1538-84), Archbishop of Milan, enforced the reforms decreed by the council, and St. Francis de Sales of Geneva (1567-1622) spent his best energies in restoring genuine Catholic doctrine and piety. Among civil rulers sponsoring the needed reform were Philip II of Spain (1527-98) and Mary Tudor (1516-58), his wife, in England. Unfortunately this aspect of the reformation led to embitterment between England and Scotland, England and Spain, Poland and Sweden, and to almost two centuries of religious wars. As a result of the Counter Reformation, the Catholic Church became stronger in her institutional structure, more dedicated to the work of evangelization, and more influential in world affairs.
What was Martin Luther trying to do to the Catholic Church?
There were (and are) abuses of power by the Catholic church, such as the selling of indulgences and immorality on the part of the church hierarchy.
.
Catholic AnswerMartin Luther attached the Catholic Church because of sin, mostly his own. He was an Augustinian Friar under solemn vows (which he had made voluntarily after years of prayer and reflection) of poverty, chastity, and obedience. He left his Order without even asking for permission or a dispensation from his vows, and proceeded to flaunt all of them - in a rather spectacular fashion. M. Luther had severe problems with Christian morality and rather than repenting, believing in the power of Christ to save him; he rewrote Christianity into something else (now called protestantism and Lutheranism) in which he didn't have to live by the Gospel and could claim he was saved despite himself. He attacked the Catholic Church in an attempt to deny responsibility for his actions.from
Radio Replies, by Fathers Rumble and Carty, 1942
221 The power of Romanism was shattered by Martin Luther, of immortal memory.
Martin Luther is undoubtedly an outstanding figure in history. But the immortal memory of Luther will become less and less pleasant as the facts concerning him become known. Those who idealize Luther can do so only by ignoring an immense amount of inconvenient information. He was a priest of the Catholic Church, but one who was not faithful to his obligations even as a Christian. On his own admissions he was a victim of both immorality and drunkenness; and he was the most intolerant of men. Far from granting liberty of conscience, he refused to allow anyone to think differently from himself, and coolly said, "Whoever teaches otherwise than I teach is a child of hell."
How did the government of France work during the French Revolution?
In France the King ruled in the Ancien Regime.This means he had the divine right to rule.He thought he got his power from God. At first there was an assembly to make a constitution and then there was a legislative assembly called the "Convention Nationale". A policy of terror led by Robespierre and which caused the beheading of the king Louis XVI put an end at the first revolutionnary government. So by 1794 a new governmental system was created : the "Directoire", with an executive power of five persons and two legislative assemblies : the "Conseil des Anciens" (elder's council) and the "Conseil des Cinq Cents" (council of the five hundred). Napoleon put an end at the revolutionnary period with his coup of 1799 and he founded the "Consulat".
What happened after the French revolution in Catholic religion?
Some priests survived, and Our Blessed Lord sent His Mother to speak to the people and offer them comfort and a way out of their difficulties, to quote the words of Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, to Sister Lucia of Fatima:
"Make it know to my ministers that, given that they follow example of the king of France in delaying the execution of my request, they will follow him into misfortune."
He returned later in that same year, August 1931:
"They did not want to heed my request. Like the king of France, they will repent and do so, but it will be too late." Some did, most did not, and World War II followed on the heels of World War I, for a complete recounting of the story, please see that last chapter "1917 AD: Fatima and the Twentieth Century in Diane Moczar's book, Ten Dates Every Catholic Should Know. See book at the link below.
What did nuns spend most of their time doing in the middle ages?
Medieval nuns, like monks, followed the strict Liturgy or sequence of services. These were based on the Bible's assertion that a man ought to pray seven times a day, plus once in the night. This meant getting up for the night service and then returning to bed, getting up again for the first service of the day.
It is important to realise that time was seen very differently before mechanical clocks were invented; there was no accurate way of telling time, so all of the daily services were held at approximately the following times (which could vary in different nunneries and monasteries and at different times of year):
2 am: Matins, often combined with Lauds
6 am: Prime
9 am: Terce
12 noon: Sext
3 pm: Nones
6 pm: Vespers
8 pm: Compline
Nuns and monks went to bed in complete silence straight after Compline was finished. In between these Holy Offices were the daily Chapter meeting (around 7 am), the two daily Masses, meals, time spent reading or studying and time spent working at different tasks.
In theory the day was split equally between study, work and prayer, but in fact prayer took up the largest portion of a nun's time.
What_time_did_nuns_have_to_get_up
Read more: What_time_did_nuns_have_to_get_up
Some sources say that Saint George was born in Lydda, Roman Palestine. Some people say George was born in Turkey, others in Greece.
What was one source of Martin Luther's conflict with the catholic church?
Another answer from our community:
. Martin Luther's primary "gripe" with the Catholic Church was that the Church was holding him accountable for his moral behavior. In addition, M. Luther, supposedly, was a priest in the Augustinian Order. For an Augustinian priest, he was remarkably ignorant of his faith and his theology. Martin Luther objected to his vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, and proceeded to leave his monastery without permission, and to break every one of his vows, without bothering to even ask for a dispensation from his solemnly professed vows. Martin Luther had many, many problems, and he blamed the Church for all of them. For a complete discussion of his "gripes" please get the book The Facts About Luther, by Patrick O'Hare:
Is a aspirin a day good for you?
Low-dose aspirin (as 81 - 162mg ) can safely be taken by most individuals for primary prevention of heart attacks; however, those taking Coumadin should be alert for the possibility of bruising or bleeding .
Was the Catholic church corrupt?
During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, some popes, bishops, and priests were corrupt and some were not. That changed for the most part with the Counter Reformation. Although the Catholic Church did not adopt Calvin's Institutes, the leaders of the council made the reforms he demanded in that book. That ended the overt corruption. Corruption will remain in any organization with human leadership.
.
Catholic AnswerThe Catholic church is the Mystical Body of Christ. It is His church, it is His Body, He is the head, we are the members. By its very definition, it can not be corrupt. However, as with the parable of the weeds and the tares, God has decreed that the evil ones are to be left to be judged by Him, and by Him alone, so that there are evil and corrupt people in the church all through the ages. Nevertheless, this does not affect its holiness or purity, as that is guaranteed by Jesus who said, "Behold, I shall be with you until the end of time."
.
AnswerAs an establishment it cannot be corrupt, the same is true of government. However many of the people that were members of the church were corrupt. As is still true today.What year was the Shroud of Turin discovered?
The cloth now known as the Shroud of Turin first appeared about 1355 at a little church in Liry, in north-central France. Its owner, a soldier of fortune named Geoffroy de Charney, claimed it as the authentic shroud of Christ, although he never explained how he acquired it.
In 1600 were there more Protestants or Catholics?
England was more Protestant in 1558. This was when Elizabeth I came to power and made England Protestant, but allowed Catholics to worship privately. However, there was most likely to have been more Catholics than Protestants in England.
What role did catholic church play in governing Spain's American empire?
The Catholic played their role by sending their missionary into South America.
What are similarities of Orthodoxy and Catholicism?
They are shall we say about 85% in synch with each other. Russian and Greek Orthodoxy worship the same God, honor the same ( generally) saints, and have an elaborate system of rituals and sacraments- numbering 7 major sacraments. The ORTHO Rites differ in the following. They do not recognize the primacy or supremacy of the Pope, there is loosely more latitude for such things as divorce. There are differences in worship apart from the obvious language angles- for example the (Three times around the Horn) practice (l080 degrees of arc, By the way) which is a Wedding protocol in Russian and Greek Ortho use but has no counterpart in the Roman Catholic church. Statues are not used in Ortho churches but two-dimensional Icons, also spelled Ikons are. Communion is frequently under both kinds- Bread and wine. Finally one major difference is priests or ministers are permitted to be married- (only once) if a minister"s wife dies he cannot remarry) but Bishops are requiired to be celibate and the higher-ups are only selected, so to speak from the (Regular- celibacy-bound clergy). There are different ecceleasiatical ranks such as Metropolitan- a sort of Urban Bishop-like officer. No Stacy, he does not wear a subway-conductor"s flat-top hat! That"s an old joke, lilke those about De Gaulle and the IRT. Kidding aside the two faiths have a lot in common and stately, formal ritual is a mark of the Orthodox faith, no frivolous folk-hymsn unless handled by the choirs.
Was England the only country to break away from the Catholic Church?
No. Other formerly Catholic countries which, in the aftermath of the Protestant Reformation, officially outlawed the practice of Catholicism (although most have subsequently reversed that position) include: Scotland, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, the German confederation, Switzerland, and France. (In the case of France, at the time of the French Revolution, the Catholic clergy were required to take an oath of allegiance to the French State in preference to the Pope. Those who refused were imprisoned or exiled.)
For Catholics, relics are those items remaining of holy personages or places. Regarding saints, there are three classes of relics.
A first class relic is a piece of the actual saint themselves. This usually consists in either a piece of bone or hair. First class relics must be authenticated by the Church before they can be publicly venerated. First class relics used to be embedded in altar stones, which were inserted into a Catholic altar which would then be consecrated for use at Mass. These relics came from saints that died as martyrs, in keeping the concept of sacrifice.
A second class relic consists of something the saint touched or used during their life. This consists of clothing, tools, objects, etc. Second class relics also require authentication before they can be publicly veneration.
A third class relic is one that has been touched to a first class relic. It is kept mainly for private devotion and is not for use for public veneration.
A Catholic artifact following the definition of an artifact in general, i.e. "any object made by human work". This includes churches, holy vessels, vestments, books, etc. These artifacts may or may not be consecrated depending on their use.
What is a Catholic upbringing like?
I had a Christian upbringing. My parents were both involved in the church by the time I came along. My mom had been in the church since her birth, like me.
Children who are raised in Christian homes are usually baptised or dedicated to the Lord between birth and their toddler years (this depends on the family and their denomination). This means that the family and Christians around the family will work together to instruct and lead the child towards Christian principles.
Just like the majority of non-Christian children out there - little ones are taught to respect their elders, their friends, and animals. They are taught the Golden Rule (treat others as you would want them to treat you) and are punished for bad behavior ("spare the rod, spoil the child" - Proverbs 13:24). I was generally a good kid and had little problems with discipline.
If Christian parents so choose, they may put their children in a private, Christian school. I have been in private school since pre-kindergarten. This way, children are brought up in Christ-honoring places: home, school, and church.
Church is a very important place. Vacation Bible School, Sunday School, and Bible Memory Verses are the highlights I remember. I can quote many verses or know where to find them. It's just been ingrained in my head from school and church, and I am so thankful for that.
Once a child from a Christian home hits teen years, things can go crazy. Some teens rebel, especially if their parents were over-protective or ridiculously strict. That is not uncommon, but not the majority. There are many well-behaved, godly, and fun-loving teens out there. It depends, a lot, on if the child has a personal relatioship with Christ by this time or not. A child who loves the Lord for him/herself is less likely to push the boundaries beyond the normal expectations of teenager-hood. In conclusion, Adults who were raised in Christian homes tend to have a clearer understanding and a better foundation of Christianity, but in God's eyes are no different than adults who became Christians at 25, 35, or even 65.
In 1632, the Catholic nobleman Cecil Calvert, also known as Lord Baltimore, established the colony of Maryland as a haven for Catholics. In 1633, he named his brother Leonard Calvert as governor of this colony.
What was the Medieval Catholic Church's position on slavery?
During the Middle Ages, the Church repeatedly prohibited the sale of Christian slaves to masters who were not Christian and the exportation of slaves to lands that were not Christian. It also condemned slavery in general on a number of occasions.
Slavery was common all in much of the world at the time the Middle Ages started. Certainly it was common in most of the Roman Empire, and it was common practice under Islam. The people of Western Asia included groups that raided into Eastern Europe for slaves, the Vikings took slaves, though mostly for their own use. St. Patrick was a slave because he was taken in a raid by Irish slave pirates. Slavery was used as a form of punishment in the Middle Ages; a person who committed a crime and could not pay the fine could be sold into slavery, with the money going to pay the fine, including compensation for victims or their families. In fact people sold themselves into slavery during times of famine, just to get food. These things being the case, the Church might have had a job it could not finish if it tried to stop slavery altogether.
The opposition to slavery did have effect, however. In 1066, only a few weeks after the Battle of Hastings, King William I made a law that slavery of Christians was not permitted, and slave trade was abolished in England altogether in 1102 by Henry I, as a result of the condemnation of slavery by the Council of London. Similar work was being done outside England in Western Europe.
It should be noted that slavery and serfdom are not the same thing, and so condemnations of slavery did not amount to condemnations of serfdom. Serfs could not be bought or sold, and had important rights under the system of serfdom, under which they were largely, though not entirely, free.
There are links below.
Whose 95 Theses questioned the activities of the Catholic Church?
Martin Luther wrote"Ninety-Five theses" on October, 31st, 1517.
What caused the split with the Roman Catholic Church during the eleventh century?
Some people thought that worshiping idols (such as a statue) was wrong, but others thought that it was ok. So they performed a schism (a split).
Roman Catholic AnswerMany things, mostly based on sin, in other words, men wanting to do their own will, and not the will of God:from A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, Second edition, revised 1957
The Schism of the East the estrangement and severance from the Holy See of what is now called the Orthodox Eastern Church was a gradual process extending over centuries. After a number of minor schisms the first serious, though short, break was that of Photius; from then on tension between East and West increased, and the schism of Cerularius occurred in 1054. From then on the breach gradually widened and has been definitive since 1472. There was a formal union from the 2nd Council of Lyons in 1274 until 1282, and a more promising one after the Council of Florence from 1439 to 1472. After the capture of Constantinople it was in the Turkish interest to reopen and widen the breach with the powerful Roman church; the patriarchates of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem were dragged into this policy, Russia and the Slav churches stood out the longest of any: none of these churches, except Constantinople itself in 1472, formally and definitely broke away from the unity of the Church. But in the course of centuries the schism has set and crystallized into a definite separation from the Holy See of many million people with a true priesthood and valid sacraments. The origins, causes and development of the schism are matters of much complication, still not fully unraveled.