What can go wrong at a court hearing?
There are so MANY possibilities that this is really an impossible question to answer.
Which of these is a reason why candidates go out on the campaign trial?
To be written up in the news so people can get to know them.
How did civil rights actof 1964 affect bilingual education?
Although the Civil Rights Act of 1964 didn't directly address bilingual education, it opened the door to future legislation. By specifically prohibiting discrimination based on national origin, it charged schools to present the same opportunities for minorities as there were for non-minorities. This also included those who were in a language minority.
Why did Johnson consider the civil rights bill unconstitutional?
The civil rights bill asserted, that the civil rights of the citizen were to be protected by the federal courts against the laws of the state in which he lived. Johnson, with his states' rights views, was forced to veto the bill.
In the movie separate but equal why was it so important that the supreme court vote unanimously?
In the move Separate but Equal it was very important that the Supreme Court vote was unanimous to support the change to society. The decision was going to bring about social change and the decision need to come from a united front.
Patriot Act
You are now able to view porn sites legally (lol), and call to buy a product that has been advertised on TV. I dont know what that law is called....Please improve my answers....
Can loss prevention hold an interrogate a minor?
lOSS PREVENTION OFFICERS CAN HOLD A MINOR UNTIL LAW ENFORCEMENT ARRIVES, LOSS PREVENTION OFFICERS CANNOT INTERROGATE MINORS WITHOUT THE PARENT OR GUARDIAN PRESENT. THIS IS USUALLY LEFT UP TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. LAW ENFORCEMENT MUST BE CALLED IMMEDIATELY, THIS WILL PROTECT YOU AND YOUR COMPANY FROM LITIGATION.
What is professional standard of care for physicians?
The professional standard of care in case of physicians becomes important if you wish to proceed against them in a consumer forum to recover damages.
There cannot be any objective standard for care by a phsycian. I am conversant with Indian consumer protection scenario and till date no regulatory or statutory body has published any standard guideline for care.
However, the level of care can be assumed to be that of a reasonable and regulary updated professional of the medical profession. The phsycian cannot go against the etablished norms of treatment and diagnosis in the profession and can not experiment with the patient.
In order to prove the standard of care, opinion of experts in that field of treatment can be very useful.
Can you serve jail time for using drugs in your past?
you mean if someone told the cops you used to do drugs? its hear-say. so no. unless you get caught with drugs on you, you get caught with paraphernalia, or you get caught in the act of using them or under the influence, you can't get in trouble. imagine what this country would be like if you could get arrested for using drugs sometime in the past. 99% of the population would be in jail lol.
What is the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938?
This act dealt with the airline industry's ability to provide efficient service at reasonable charges without unjust discrimination, undue preferences, or advantages or unfair or destructive competitive practices.
Which factors are the most important in crime control?
A) Strong consequences for committing criminal acts.
B) Strong presence of law enforcement.
C) Strong presence of surveillance and/or emergency personell notification equipment.
Who could vote in Canada when it was founded in 1867?
Only a small percentage of the population could vote. These potential voters were men over the age of 21, usually with British backgrounds and they either had personal property or real property of value. In New Brunswick, for example, a man needed to have a value of $400. In Ontario, an annual income of $250 for urban dwellers would qualify one to cast a ballot. Excluded were all women, Aboriginal people and members of certain religious denominations and racial groups.
Can you pay bills with your birth certificate?
somme research says that yes you can but as of yet no one is sure
but most likely i would say no
The only means that one can use a birth certificate to pay bills is claims as proof of identity to garner access to existing bank accounts and or open a bank account as these documents are vital to obtain a legal photo I.D.
Now under some old colony laws the right of birth enables also the access to government assistance or application of such to receive money to pay for bills in those days a govt official would validate a vendor to accept vital goods for life (this is still viable only to FEMA as the approved merchant or bill collector must document offerings if properly registered with govt). If one doesn't have proper I.D. for issues such as stolen wallet with I.D. and or loss via a home fire and/or etc. I would say yes only in certain situations of the most extreme consequences such as a natural disaster where the documentation is used to receive vouchers to pay for recover only in situations such as a natural disaster through FEMA.
But if no incidence of natural disaster or if not applying through a government social services agency then NO, no retailer and or bill collector is currently authorized to accept a birth certificate as it's the one area of proof of Identity - it's best not to openly display such a document that secures your identity in cases of identity fraud or open yourself of having this document compromised by open display to others that may or may not take content of information pertained in order to commit an act of identity fraud against you.
What did the Civil Rights Act of 1866 do?
the civil rights act of 1866 granted citizenship to all persons born in the united states except for native Americans
Was Homer Plessy sent to jail after his trial in the US Supreme Court?
No. Plessy didn't have a trial in the US Supreme Court; they heard an appeal of his case. After the Court made its decision, Homer Plessy was rearrested for the original "offense" on January 11, 1897 (according to a New Orleans warrant) and paid a $25 fine, but was not sent to jail.
More Information
The Supreme Court considered Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) under its appellate jurisdiction, meaning they reviewed the decisions of the lower courts on appeal, to ensure the Constitution was being upheld, but did not conduct a trial or rule on Plessy's guilt or innocence. By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, the issue under consideration was whether the Louisiana Separate Car Act that required racial segregation in railroad transportation violated the 13th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution.
Homer Plessy's trial was before Judge John Ferguson (the Ferguson named in the case) in the Criminal District Court for Orleans Parish. Plessy refused to enter a plea, arguing instead that the Separate Car Act was null and void because it violated his constitutional rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments. He was found guilty without entering a plea.
Plessy's attorney then appealed and filed for a writ of prohibition (an order from a higher court to a lower court preventing the court from exercising its jurisdiction) in the Criminal Court of Appeals, then in the Louisiana Supreme Court, and finally in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Homer Plessy didn't actually enter a "guilty" plea until January 11, 1897, more than four months after the Supreme Court ruled on his case.
Homer Plessy was rearrested for the original "offense" on January 11, 1897, according to a New Orleans warrant, and paid a $25 fine, but was never sent to jail.
Case Citation:
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
How many amendments are about who can vote?
There are three amendments regarding who is allowed to vote:
- The 15th amendment gave all races the right to vote.
- The 19th amendment gave women the right to vote.
- The 26th amendment reduced the voting age to 18.
No there are no Miranda rights in Canada. There actually is no such thing as "Miranda Rights". Miranda Rights name comes from the court decision involving Miranda v. Arizona when a defendant didn't know his legal rights, most notably the 5th Amendment in the "Bill of Rights" in the US Constitution. Which is protection from self incrimination, hence, "You have the right to remain silent" and the 6th Amendment which guarantees legal consul, "You have the right to consult with a lawyer" All of these "rights" are guaranteed to Americans and their visitors to the US (both legal and illegal) by the US Constitution. Hence Canada is not a part of the United States and there for, Canadians do not have these exclusive rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and further established by the Miranda v. Arizona court case.
Now the Canadian Citizens do have something similar to this however it is called "Charter of Rights and Freedoms". It is not the same as the Miranda Warning, Miranda Rights, or the Rights granted under the US Constitution.
In three related decisions, a sharply divided (Supreme) court (of Canada) fine-tuned the rules on suspects' right to counsel.
In the main case, the justices ruled 5-4 that the Charter of Rights does not confer a right to have a lawyer present during interrogation.
When did Homer Plessy plead guilty?
Homer Plessy, the Petitioner in the landmark US Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), was arrested on June 7, 1892 for refusing to remove himself from a "whites only" train car on the East Louisiana Railroad, in violation of Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. Act 111 required passengers to be separated by race and Plessy, who appeared white, was one-eighth African-American. When the conductor asked Plessy to declare his race, Plessy responded that he was "colored." He was promptly arrested and taken to jail in New Orleans, Orleans Parish.
Plessy was held at the jail overnight, then processed and released on bail June 8, 1892, after waiving his right to see a judge.
On October 28, 1892, Homer Plessy and his attorney, John C. Walker, appeared before Judge John Ferguson in the Criminal District Court for Orleans Parish. Plessy refused to enter a plea, arguing instead that the Separate Car Act was null and void because it violated his constitutional rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments. He was found guilty without entering a plea.
Plessy's attorney then appealed and filed for a writ of prohibition (an order from a higher court to a lower court preventing the court from exercising its jurisdiction) in the Criminal Court of Appeals, then in the Louisiana Supreme Court, and finally in the Supreme Court of the United States.
According to a New Orleans arrest warrant, Homer Plessy didn't enter a "guilty" plea until January 11, 1897, more than six months after his case had been decided by the US Supreme Court. Plessy paid a $25 fine, but was not jailed.
Is camera in public mall bathroom illegal?
I would have to say yes because even if the excuse is to prevent or identify vandals, it still would defeat the purpose for the installer because they still have to find & catch them. In the process setting themselves up for possible civil action from non-vandals who feels their privacy has been compromised.
It would make more sense to just apply another layer of paint then have to deal with a lawsuit or lose customers for such an offense.
How do a farther put hisself on child support?
This assumes you mean, "How does a father put himself on child support?": 1) establish paternity; 2) get legal custody of child; 3) petition courts for child support (all of these steps will require notice to the mother of the child).
When did the civil rights speech happen?
On the topic of civil rights, as on many other topics, there have been many speeches. Probably the most famous civil rights speech of the 20th Century was made in 1963 by Martin Luther King, Jr. It is sometimes referred to as the "I Have a Dream" speech.
Homer A. Plessy (March 17, 1863 - March 1, 1925) was the petitioner in the landmark US Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896), that legitimized the "separate but equal" doctrine used to discriminate against African-Americans. The Plessy ruling, combined with the Court's earlier decision in the Civil Rights Cases, 163 US 537 (1883), which repealed the Civil Rights Act of 1875, allowed Jim Crow laws to flourish across the country (most particularly in the Southern states). Plessy was finally overturned by Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954).
Homer Plessy was 30 years old when he was arrested on June 7, 1892, for sitting in a whites-only railroad car, per the restrictions set by Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. The East Louisiana Railroad Company, which also wanted the Separate Car Act repealed, conspired with the Citizens' Committee and Plessy to arrange Plessy's arrest so he would have standing to challenge the law in court.