Imperialism

India

France - then the Vietnamese fought for and got their freedom from France, the US invaded but they got kicked out as well. France

britian

The United States, in that it was the destination of African Americans who went back to Africa as well as the those slaves freed before reaching the US once brining in new slaves was criminalized.

Primarily in the Caribbean on islands such as Hispaniola (Dominican Republic) and Cuba. Colonization of the mainland started in the 1500s.

The colonial painting is not at all from India.Indian paintings belong to India. Some Indian paintings are:

Damayantiand Nala etc

europe

The European nations divided Africa into colonies based on artificial regions, ignoring the ethnic and tribal divisions that had existed. This caused conflicts between native populations, as well as with their colonial governments.

Britain and France

spain, i hope that this answered your question

Based on the Italian's treatment of the Libyan people, which sometimes rose to the level of war crimes, the relationship was not a good one. The Libyans attempted to rebel, but were soon defeated by superior Italian military. To the Italians' credit, they passed laws in the thirties, which gave the Libyan people more rights than were seen in other European colonies.

to sell America's surplus of goods

The Dutch colonized Mauritius in the 1600s as a stopping point on the way to India.

Nicholas. It's a colonial name!

the religion in christiananity xD

I believe it is Europe.

Although other countries had the opportunity to colonise Australia, they chose not to. Australia was first "officially" discovered by Dutch traders in the East Indies: however, they landed in the west, one of the least forgiving areas of the continent and decided that it was not worth colonising. The climate was harsh; the terrain was flat and uninspiring; and the country appeared to offer no resources they could utilise or exploit.

Likewise, the French, hearing of the Dutch discovery, sent an expedition to map more of the coast. This did not, however, lead to any attempts to colonise due to the dryness of the land, but the French did spend the next decades exploring elsewhere along the coast. They bided their time, wanting to see if the land was worth colonising.

It was not until James Cook's successful voyage which involved charting the eastern coast of Australia, that New South Wales was seen as a viable proposition for a convict colony. In particular, it was endorsed by Sir Joseph Banks, the influential botanist who travelled with Cook. Banks was one of three botanists aboard Cook's ship "The Endeavour", and he was a passionate advocate of British settlement and colonisation of the Australian continent. It was largely upon Cook's and Banks's recommendation that Australian ultimately was colonised by the British, and not by another power later.

This sucks

John Smith and his team of settlers made a colonization or homestead of the land of Virginia.

Empresarios were responsible for settling Texas

1607

Yes it is. Thailand is the only one country in South East Asia that had not been colonized by any Europeans.

This is why Thailand prides itself on being the only country in Southeast Asia, which was not colonized by the European powers

The British colonies formed a new country because they were being treated differently by the British people from the mainland.