0
Protestantism
Generally associated with the protests against the Catholic Church and its methods, Protestants follow Jesus Christ. One of the early scholars to lead the break from the established church was Martin Luther. If you have questions about anything to do with Protestantism, this is place to ask them.
1,475 Questions
Will you float if you meditate for a long time?
. The first thing to be understood is to drop the idea of trying to meditate for anything. If you begin by desiring quieter thoughts or more relaxation or learning how to float or any other things you are setting yourself up for failure.
Meditation is the process of becoming aware of what is in this moment. Whatever is, is perfect.
If, as you begin to watch, to look in, to become aware, you notice thoughts happening, great! Thoughts are happening. I will simply be aware as the thoughts pass through.
If you notice feelings of joy arising, great! I will watch joy.
Simply notice what is, and accept it from your heart, with no expectations for any particular state of being.
Good luck!
The Protestant Reformation was a movement in The Holy Roman Empire that began with Martin Luther's activities in 1517, with roots further back in time. It ended with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.[1] The movement began as an attempt to reform the Catholic Church. Many western Catholics were troubled by what they saw as false doctrines and malpractices within the Church, particularly involving the teaching and sale of indulgences. Another major contention was the practice of buying and selling church positions (simony) and what was seen at the time as considerable corruption within the Church's hierarchy. This corruption was seen by many at the time as systemic, even reaching the position of the Pope. On 31 October 1517, in Saxony (in what is now Germany), Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church, which served as a notice board for university-related announcements.[1] These were points for debate that criticized the Church and the Pope. The most controversial points centered on the practice of selling indulgences and the Church's policy on Purgatory. Luther's spiritual predecessors were men such as John Wycliffe and Jan Hus. Other radicals, such as Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin, soon followed Luther's lead. Church beliefs and practices under attack by Protestant reformers included Purgatory, particular judgment, devotion to Mary (Mariology) , the intercession of and devotion to the saints, most of the sacraments, the mandatory celibacy requirement of its clergy (including monasticism), and the authority of the Pope. The Protestant Reformation was a movement in The Holy Roman Empire that began with Martin Luther's activities in 1517, with roots further back in time. It ended with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.[1] The movement began as an attempt to reform the Catholic Church. Many western Catholics were troubled by what they saw as false doctrines and malpractices within the Church, particularly involving the teaching and sale of indulgences. Another major contention was the practice of buying and selling church positions (simony) and what was seen at the time as considerable corruption within the Church's hierarchy. This corruption was seen by many at the time as systemic, even reaching the position of the Pope. On 31 October 1517, in Saxony (in what is now Germany), Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church, which served as a notice board for university-related announcements.[1] These were points for debate that criticized the Church and the Pope. The most controversial points centered on the practice of selling indulgences and the Church's policy on Purgatory. Luther's spiritual predecessors were men such as John Wycliffe and Jan Hus. Other radicals, such as Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin, soon followed Luther's lead. Church beliefs and practices under attack by Protestant reformers included Purgatory, particular judgment, devotion to Mary (Mariology) , the intercession of and devotion to the saints, most of the sacraments, the mandatory celibacy requirement of its clergy (including monasticism), and the authority of the Pope.
Are pilgrims considered protestant?
That's relative to what you're discussing. A pilgrim is someone who travels for a religious reason. If you mean the Pilgrims, or the people who landed at Plymouth Rock, then they were. Now if you meant simply a pilgrim, then a pilgrim could be any faith.
Is the aporcrypha the protestant Bible?
No - the Apocryphal books are non-canonical, that is, they are not part of the Protestant Bible.
Why did spanish monarchs oppose the spread of protestantism?
They viewed it as a threat to their authority.
Why do some churches use leavened bread at communion?
Some churches use leavened bread for Communion because they believe the appropriate bread for the Lord's Supper is the common bread of the local community. Other churches use unleavened bread in recognition of the Jewish feast of Passover, which was the occasion at which Jesus first instituted the rite of Communion. Each choice is supported by valid but differing theological viewpoints.
Since Vatican II, there is much more similarity between Catholics churches and Protestant churches. Originally, only the Anglican Protestants had interiors invoking a Catholic church since they still had altars, iconography and even tabernacles. There used to be a very palpable difference when entering a Catholic church versus a Protestant church, so much so that the members of each church would feel uncomfortable to enter the building of the other, so alien was the interior.
Modern Catholic churches since the 1960s have made an attempt to modernize and adapt to the world while complimenting the Protestant form of design and worship. To this end most modern Catholic churches resemble a Lutheran church at first glance. The altar is now pulled out from the wall and looks like a table, the tabernacle is often absent from the sanctuary, iconography is minimal and those symbols that are used are usually generic Christian symbols such as vines, bread, fishes, impressions of Jesus, colorful mosaics and other things that do not invoke particular sentiments of any single denomination. Catholic Mass and its execution has also sought parity with the Protestant form with more emphasis being put on the congregation and social participation through frequent singing and responses, ceremonies being recited in the vernacular, the choir placed at the front, the multiple use of jubilant responses and psalms, the use of secular musical instruments, Eucharistic ministers, the congregation bringing up the offerings, handshaking during Mass, the singing of popular hymns of Protestant origin, the handling of Communion and sometimes reception of both species (they are consecrated in Catholic ceremonies) and the inclusion of Protestant prayers. As well, modern Catholic services and even catechism tend to lean more towards solely Biblical interpretations and often neglect the aspect of Holy Tradition in their catechesis and devotions. In addition to this, many Catholic practices have been quelled and forgotten and emphasis is instead put upon active participation in parish groups and charismatic meetings, which is very similar if not identical to Protestantism in execution and spirit.
Still, some differences persist even in modern Catholic churches. A tabernacle and sanctuary lamp can still be found as well as there being statues or pictures of the Blessed Virgin Mary or other saints. Catholics churches also have holy water fonts, which only some Protestant churches have retained. Some high Anglican churches now actually look more Catholic than Catholic churches, so radical have been the changes in Catholic church construction and arrangement since Vatican II.
Who were some of the early Christian leaders?
In Matthew 10, 2-4, we can see the names of the first Christian leaders, the apostles, the first Bishops with Jesus as the head of the Catholic church. And the names of the twelve Apostles are these: The first, Simon who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, Philip and Bartholomew, Thomas and Matthew the publican, and James the son of Alpheus, and Thaddeus, Simon the Cananean, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.
What did almond signify in the Bible?
Almonds in the Bible can sometimes be symbolic of old age as in Ecc. 12:5. Other times it can refer to promptitude as in Jer 1:11.
Why is Maccabees not in the protestant bible?
This was part of 14 books not in the Hebrew Bible, but added later, so protestants decided they were not inspired by God. The King James Version originally contained the Apocrypha, but printers began leaving them out to save money.
Does the catholic bible contain the word Jehovah?
The word "Jehovah" is the German translation of the Hebrew word "YHWH/Yahweh". "Jehovah" entered the English language in the nineteenth century, when German scholars were at the forfront of biblical research. The modern Catholic bible would probably not have Jehovah but either the actual "YHWH" or "Lord".
Do You Mean - Wyclef?Wyclef Jean(born Nelust Wyclef Jean onOctober 17, 1972)Is a multi-platinum Haitian-Americanmusician,actor,producerand former-member of the hip hop trio The Fugees.
Were there women preachers in the Bible?
Answer: There is perhaps no more hotly debated issue in the church today than the issue of women serving as pastors/preachers. As a result, it is very important to not see this issue as men versus women. There are women who believe women should not serve as pastors and that the Bible places restrictions on the ministry of women, and there are men who believe women can serve as preachers and that there are no restrictions on women in ministry. This is not an issue of chauvinism or discrimination. It is an issue of biblical interpretation.
The Word of God proclaims, "A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent" (1 Timothy 2:11-12). In the church, God assigns different roles to men and women. This is a result of the way mankind was created and the way in which sin entered the world (1 Timothy 2:13-14). God, through the apostle Paul, restricts women from serving in roles of teaching and/or having spiritual authority over men. This precludes women from serving as pastors, which definitely includes preaching to, teaching, and having spiritual authority over men.
There are many "objections" to this view of women in ministry. A common one is that Paul restricts women from teaching because in the first century, women were typically uneducated. However, 1 Timothy 2:11-14 nowhere mentions educational status. If education were a qualification for ministry, the majority of Jesus' disciples would not have been qualified. A second common objection is that Paul only restricted the women of Ephesus from teaching (1 Timothy was written to Timothy, who was the pastor of the church in Ephesus). The city of Ephesus was known for its temple to Artemis, a false Greek/Roman goddess. Women were the authority in the worship of Artemis. However, the book of 1 Timothy nowhere mentions Artemis, nor does Paul mention Artemis worship as a reason for the restrictions in 1 Timothy 2:11-12.
A third common objection is that Paul is only referring to husbands and wives, not men and women in general. The Greek words in the passage could refer to husbands and wives; however, the basic meaning of the words refers to men and women. Further, the same Greek words are used in verses 8-10. Are only husbands to lift up holy hands in prayer without anger and disputing (verse 8)? Are only wives to dress modestly, have good deeds, and worship God (verses 9-10)? Of course not. Verses 8-10 clearly refer to all men and women, not only husbands and wives. There is nothing in the context that would indicate a switch to husbands and wives in verses 11-14.
Yet another frequent objection to this interpretation of women in ministry is in relation to women who held positions of leadership in the Bible, specifically Miriam, Deborah, and Huldah in the Old Testament. This objection fails to note some significant factors. First, Deborah was the only female judge among 13 male judges. Huldah was the only female prophet among dozens of male prophets mentioned in the Bible. Miriam's only connection to leadership was being the sister of Moses and Aaron. The two most prominent women in the times of the Kings were Athaliah and Jezebel-hardly examples of godly female leadership. Most significantly, though, the authority of women in the Old Testament is not relevant to the issue. The book of 1 Timothy and the other Pastoral Epistles present a new paradigm for the church-the body of Christ-and that paradigm involves the authority structure for the church, not for the nation of Israel or any other Old Testament entity.
Similar arguments are made using Priscilla and Phoebe in the New Testament. In Acts 18, Priscilla and Aquila are presented as faithful ministers for Christ. Priscilla's name is mentioned first, perhaps indicating that she was more "prominent" in ministry than her husband. However, Priscilla is nowhere described as participating in a ministry activity that is in contradiction to 1 Timothy 2:11-14. Priscilla and Aquila brought Apollos into their home and they both discipled him, explaining the Word of God to him more accurately (Acts 18:26).
In Romans 16:1, even if Phoebe is considered a "deaconess" instead of a "servant," that does not indicate that Phoebe was a teacher in the church. "Able to teach" is given as a qualification for elders, but not deacons (1 Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:6-9). Elders/bishops/deacons are described as the "husband of one wife," "a man whose children believe," and "men worthy of respect." Clearly the indication is that these qualifications refer to men. In addition, in 1 Timothy 3:1-13 and Titus 1:6-9, masculine pronouns are used exclusively to refer to elders/bishops/deacons.
The structure of 1 Timothy 2:11-14 makes the "reason" perfectly clear. Verse 13 begins with "for" and gives the "cause" of Paul's statement in verses 11-12. Why should women not teach or have authority over men? Because "Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived." God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a "helper" for Adam. This order of creation has universal application in the family (Ephesians 5:22-33) and the church. The fact that Eve was deceived is also given as a reason for women not serving as pastors or having spiritual authority over men. This leads some to believe that women should not teach because they are more easily deceived. That concept is debatable, but if women are more easily deceived, why should they be allowed to teach children (who are easily deceived) and other women (who are supposedly more easily deceived)? That is not what the text says. Women are not to teach men or have spiritual authority over men because Eve was deceived. As a result, God has given men the primary teaching authority in the church.
Many women excel in gifts of hospitality, mercy, teaching, and helps. Much of the ministry of the local church depends on women. Women in the church are not restricted from public praying or prophesying (1 Corinthians 11:5), only from having spiritual teaching authority over men. The Bible nowhere restricts women from exercising the gifts of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12). Women, just as much as men, are called to minister to others, to demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23), and to proclaim the gospel to the lost (Matthew 28:18-20; Acts 1:8; 1 Peter 3:15).
God has ordained that only men are to serve in positions of spiritual teaching authority in the church. This is not because men are necessarily better teachers, or because women are inferior or less intelligent (which is not the case). It is simply the way God designed the church to function. Men are to set the example in spiritual leadership-in their lives and through their words. Women are to take a less authoritative role. Women are encouraged to teach other women (Titus 2:3-5). The Bible also does not restrict women from teaching children. The only activity women are restricted from is teaching men or having spiritual authority over them. This logically would preclude women from serving as pastors/preachers. This does not make women less important, by any means, but rather gives them a ministry focus more in agreement with God's plan and His gifting of them.
But for a more detailed explanation as to exactly why women in general are not forbidden to preach, please see the website resource below under "Sources and related links."
What movement divided the protestant and Catholic Church?
To be perfectly honest, nothing "divided" the protestant and Catholic Church. The Catholic church is the Mystical Body of Christ. It, by definition, is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic, and thus can't be divided. The people who founded the protestant churches are know as heretics: in other words, they protested against some aspect of the faith of the Catholic church, and founded their own churches. Any time you deny something in the faith that is heresy. Lately, they have been protesting against each other and founding even more "churches". But the protestant churches now are not composed of heretics as they were brought up in those churches and never left the Catholic church. To be exact about it, it would be formal heresy, not material.
The movement you are probably referring to is know as the "reformation" although Catholic scholars refer to it as the "revolt". The "reformation" was in the sixteenth century when those who founded the protestant churches left the Church.
from A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, Second edition, revised 1957
The Protestant Reformation: the revolt from the Catholic Church in Western Europe begun and carried to its height in the 16th century. It differed from all previous heretical movements in that it was not concerned with one or a few definite points of doctrine but was directed against the whole complex and system of Christianity as then understood; it gave licence to the human self in the spiritual and religious order.
Alternative AnswerSince it looks like you're seeking an actual name, the Protestant Reformation is possibly the best choice. The word "Reformation" is worth noting; the early leaders sought reform rather than schism. In their view it was the leaders of the Roman Catholic church who were the heretics and apostates, having changed the tenets of the Church as established by Christ to include notions they felt were at best unsupported by scripture or in some cases actually antagonistic to it (Luther believed the sale of indulgences, for example, to be at odds with Biblical teachings).
It's also worth noting that the Roman Catholic church itself later underwent a Counter-Reformation which eliminated some (though not all) of the practices Luther and others had complained of, effectively tacitly admitting that the accusations were at least partly correct.
What about the Catholic Church did protestants want to change?
Among the many things:
- Sinners should not be able to buy their way into forgiveness
- The Mass should be in the language of those attending (not Latin)
The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England, 1400-1580 by Eamon Duffy (see link below)
from A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, Second edition, revised 1957
The Protestant Reformation: the revolt from the Catholic Church in Western Europe begun and carried to its height in the 16th century. It differed from all previous heretical movements in that it was not concerned with one or a few definite points of doctrine but was directed against the whole complex and system of Christianity as then understood; it gave licence to the human self in the spiritual and religious order. Its principal causes were: the excessive temporal power, wealth and privilege which accrued to the higher clergy, the wicked, worldly and careless lives of many of the clergy, secular and regular, and the decay of philosophy and theology (these resulted partly from the Renaissance) with consequent low standard of spiritual life among the people generally; the weakening of the authority of the Holy See, following the Great Schism, increased by the humanistic corruption of the papal court; the parallel insurgence of secular princes.
Its principal motives were: desire for the purity of religion and godliness of life which, from the state of the clergy, precipitated a violent and unreasoning anti-clericalism which degenerated into contempt for all spiritual authority; the national ambitions of secular princes which flourished in the break-up of the Catholic integrity of Europe; an appetite for spoil and, as in England, fear of having to give up looted ecclesiastical wealth; in some, a hatred of the Church and Faith which can be attributed only to the direct working of the Devil.The principal results of the Reformation were: the true reform of the Church "in head and members" effected by the Council of Trent and the revivification of Catholicism so thoroughly achieved that it remains vital to this day (The Counter-reformation); the putting of countless souls, notably in Great Britain, Scandinavia and the German parts of the Empire, in enmity to the Church and consequently outside those means provided by Christ for man to know and attain to God; the disappearance of any "higher unity" holding together the diverse peoples and nations of Europe, the inoculation of men with naturalistic and humanitarian (as opposed to theocentric) philosophy which is now the chiefest enemy of Christianity.What are some protest songs in both the 20th century and the 21st?
Dear Mr President by Pink
Bob Marley War, Sunday Bloody Sunday U2
What property did Cromwell's agents seize from English monasteries?
They attacked statues, roods, and images, and dismantled the shrine of St Thomas Becket at Canterbury. He also set up one Bible in each church.
