Quebec

General Montclam Louis was the French commander in the Battle of Quebec.

The Battle of Quebec (September 13th 1759) was an extremly important date in history. James Wolfe (British), and Louis-Joseph, Marquis de Montcalm (French), were at battle. British had 4, 800 regulars, while the French had 4,000 regulars nad 300 militia. Both sides had fewer than 10,000 troops. Both were wounded during battle. Wold died on the field and Montcalm passed away the next morning. The British had 658 dead or wounded. The French had 644 dead or wounded. It was a decisive British victory.

At first the war went badly for the British but the defeat of the French at the Battle of Quebec was the turning point of the French and Indian War. The British defeated the French. The Treaty of Paris (1763) gave Britain control of North America (Canada, all land east of the Mississippi River). Since Spain joined the French as allies late in the war, the French were forced to give land to the Spanish. The French have no colonies left in North America. The French had Haiti down in Central America, but no colonies in North America.

Charles I was the last to actually command troops in battle during the Civil War. James II raised and commanded an army to oppose the invasion of William of Orange but so many of his men deserted to William that he could not offer battle. Michael Montagne

George II commanded his army at the Battle of Dettingen (Germany) in 1743.

Harold II (aka Godwinson) 1066 Battle of Hastings. Since 1066 England has had French (Norman), Scottish, Dutch and German monarchs!

On the plains of Abraham and two sides battled. The british and the french in 1763. Montcalm was in charge of the french and wolfe was in charge of the British. They fought over Canada until only the British left victorious.

The Quebec act was not part of the Coercive acts but since the Quebec act came afterwards they went ahead and just said that they were a part of it. The Coercive Acts were also called the "Intolerable Acts" as viewed by the colonists.

18...but depending on the hookah bar they usually let you in if you look old enough-meaning that they wont card you.

No, Massachusetts Learner's Permits are only valid in the state of Massachusetts, you can't even go to other US States with it, except for New Hampshire, in which case you need to bring your birth certificate along with you.

In most circumstances, no. The legal age of majority in the US and most Western countries is 18. A 17-year-old needs parental consent to move out. There are a very few exceptions. For example, in some states, such as Texas or South Carolina, there seems to be a loophole in that a child can move out at age 17 and the police will not force the child to come home.

Very fertile hilly land

They are called a truant. States and many countries have mandatory education laws making it a requirement to attend school. Some states will even prosecute parents that allow their children to skip school.

As of 2014 the minimum wage in Canada varies by jurisdiction. The amount varies from 8.50 to 9.00 an hour in most locations.

My CA learner's permit specifically states that I must have someone older than 26 in the passanger's seat next to me. Check your permit, it should tell you. Otherwise, call the local DMV and ask them.

The Federal Government and the Provinces have Limitation Acts which provide a limit on the time an unsecured debt survives. If an unsecured debt is not collected or payments are not made on the unsecured debt then after a certain time no legal action can be taken to collect the debt. A March 4, 2003 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, Markevich v. The Queen decided that limitations applied to CRA as well as other Crown proceedings. Section 32 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act and Section 3 (5) of the BC Limitation Act barred collection of the Federal and Provincial portions of the debt since the debt was more than 6 years old. NOTE:Before relying on the forgoing please check with an insolvency lawyer for the latest information. The Federal Government has the habit of rewriting the law when a court decision goes against them. Examples from various provinces and the Federal Government: * British Columbia - Section 3 (5) of the BC Limitation Act sets 6 years as the limit for debt. * Alberta - The Alberta Limitations Act sets 2 years as the term which is extended to 10 years if there is a judgement. * Ontario - The Ontario Limitation Act 2002 , came into force on January 1, 2004. It sets two years as the term (Section 4). This limitation will be reinstated where the debtor acknowledges the debt or makes a partial payment towards repayment of his debt. If the default occurred prior to January 1, 2004, the creditor will continue to have 6 years to pursue the claim. However, if the default occurred after January 1, 2004 then the 2-year rule applies. * Federal - Section 32 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act sets 6 years as the limit for debt. Aphex Twin

Uhhh.. i answered this for the retared people its
Quebec City

Depending on the season the weather can be cold or hot. Winter can easily reach -30 C

if you factor in the wind. While, spring and fall months tend to be around 10-15 C. Summer time is hot, in June the temperature reaches around 25 to 30 C.

This is an open ended question, meaning virtually every person may have a differentopinion on this question. Some of the most likely issues would be:

1) Money. Would quebec be able to use the Canadian dollar, which they are on record as saying they would, as it would provide a more stable (stronger) currency than if they create a new currency.

2) Pensions - What would happen to people who are entitled to Canadian pensions for having worked and lived in Canada all their lives; would they get a Canadian pension or would they have to have it converted into whatever currency Quebec creates, should it be required to create a new pension?

3) Native rights - Since native Indians in Canada have procured rights as citizens of their own native reserve as well as Canadian citizenship, would they be allowed to still maintain their traditional relationship with Canada or would some other arrangement have to be made with the Quebec government, as a new entity (country)?

4)Travel - What would be requirements of people traveling in and out of Quebec? Would they need a passport or other documents to gain access?

5) Trade - Would current trade issues and rules apply or would there need to be new rules/laws in place allowing for the fact that Quebec is now not part of Canada?

6) Military and Foreign Affairs - Would Quebec develop its' own army, navy, etc. or would remain some connection with Canadian armed forces?

Virtually every issue which any new country is forced (decides) to establish when itbecomes independent would be required of Quebec to address (deal with). Some have said that is why a new Quebec would need to continue what has been called sovereignty-association, with Canada, so that Quebec would be independent in some manner but still maintain ties (legal and cultural for example) with Canada in othere areas. This is an issue that would have to be decided by both Canada and Quebec shouldQuebec decide to form some form of independence or separation from Canada.

French influence

1534: area explored and claimed for the French by Jacques Cartier 1608: explored by Samuel de Champlain 1663: made a royal colony by Louis XIV in 1663

PQ is the abbreviation of Provincial political party,Quebec.

led by Walter Waters

Not really.

The Greeks won the battle of Platae.

14%

Because it was .