Journalism

Good communication skills and pleasing personality probably the face.

It depends what you want to report on but all around you need a good personality good speaking skills and a pretty face

Chuck Green is a conservative political columnist, whose commentaries are syndicated to other newspapers. Among the views he has expressed in his columns are these; it should be noted that these are his opinions, many of which are not factual but are widely believed by conservative Republicans:

- Palin was more qualified than Obama
- Joe the Plumber might be the "man Americans need right now"
- Obamanomics is a disaster
- Mitt Romney would be a president with "strong family values" who "can make change"
- Bush's proposed immigration bill was "an amnesty bill, through and through"
- Denver is a "sanctuary city" for illegal aliens
- Global warming is "a variety of scientific theories based on incomplete and short-term findings, picked over by amateurs with political agendas"
- The economic recovery legislation included funding "to save an endangered mouse in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home district"
- Gore is an "energy hypocrite" and an "energy hog"
- The economic recovery bill included funds earmarked for ACORN
- Obama's record "shows a complete inability and disinterest in bipartisan cooperation"

The media should consult sport personalities before portraying anything about them

Access to specific information about sport personalities should be restricted

Geraldo Rivera's website (Geraldo.com) gives email and postal (snail) mail addresses:

Email:

geraldowebsite@gmail.com

Postal mail:

Office Of Geraldo Rivera

Fox News

1211 Avenue Of The Americas, Floor 17

New York, NY 10036

Yes he's married to asha blake.

Muckrakers is a negative term, meaning they dig for bad things (dirt) on people. Writers who write for tabloid papers, such as The National Inquirer or The Star, that you see on the newsstands by cash registers at grocery stores, like to be called muckrakers because they make a living off of it.

hahahhahah you thought i knew hahahhahah you thought i knew

Why not?

Yes, as far as I know. He just published another book of media criticism in 2012, and over a five decades-long career in education, has written or edited more than 70 books. If you are trying to reach him, I would suggest San Francisco State University, where he is a professor emeritus.

Washington, DC

I am not sure that "yellow journalism" (scary headlines, totally un-researched reporting intended to terrify the public in support of a political agenda) describes all that went wrong with the war coverage, but many critics believe it did play a part. Of course, it depends on which side you ask, but these days, even some Republicans (Colin Powell, for example) acknowledge that the Bush administration gave erroneous information to the American public. However, harsher critics believe the information was more than erroneous-- many Democrats and some libertarian Republicans, believe the Bush administration intentionally misled and manipulated the public, using friendly media sources (Fox News, conservative talk shows) to do so.

A number of liberal and moderate journalists also felt the majority of the media was too lacking in healthy skepticism and too deferential to President Bush and Vice President Cheney: one such critic, Eric Boehlert, wrote a book called "Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush." But it should also be noted that even some generally reliable media outlets that were not known as conservative (the New York Times, for one), bought into the Bush administration's desire to go to war in Iraq, publishing articles that accepted the president and vice president's assertions that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. At that time, there was not yet a blogosphere (Twitter, Facebook), nor were there many vocal critics of the war who were able to get on TV or radio to challenge President Bush's point of view.

Critics would later accuse the president of intentionally exaggerating the threat Saddam posed; there were definitely some friendly (pro-Bush) media that used the scare headlines and exaggerated claims associated with yellow journalism, but as mentioned already, not all of the reporting was intended to scare. In some cases, it was simply what reporters were told and that is what they related to their viewers, listeners, and readers. At that time, critics say, too many in the press did not ask the hard questions, and generally reported the exaggerations and erroneous assertions as if they had a basis in fact. Thus, a case could indeed be made that yellow journalism was one factor in why Americans came to believe false stories, but it was not the entire reason.

When you see scientific issues in newspapers, radio, television, and magazines, it is important to be skeptical and question information. It is essential to question statements made by people outside their area of expertise and to question claims that are based on vague statements. To determine whether information is scientific or pseudoscience (information incorrectly represented as scientific), be skeptical and identify facts and opinions.

Check out the John Peter Zenger case instead because Tinker v Des Moines 1969 has to do with freedom of speech in school, not freedom of press.

No

There is no direct translation to this word. The closest word is "Newspaper man/woman" or "periodicalist"(sic) : periodista.

jounalism

Found it on this website: www.jsc.nasa.gov/news/columbia/107_onboard_archive/messages/nfhJan302003.pdf

A major story is an article that is popular, and or important.

1.Objective

2. Interpretative

3. Investigative

4. Sensational

what is a discourse

Media law and ethics are extremely important to professionals in the journalism field. Journalists without strong integrity may do illegal things to get the first scoop on the story. Journalists without integrity may not get repeat jobs or may be blacklisted from the field all together.