Plagiarism

plagiarize

Whenever you summarize, paraphrase, or directly quote someone else's language and/or ideas you need to cite them. Failure to do so can lead to charges of plagiarism. Different disciplines require different methods for acknowledging these influences via citations; typical formats include Chicago, MLA, and APA citation styles. Your local bookstore or library should have a copy of these style manuals.

If you mean plagiarism, its different than the Black Death or Black Plague.

Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's work without giving credit and lying about it.

• "Fit as a Fiddle (And Ready For Love"
• "All I Do is Dream of You"
• "Beautiful Girl"
• "You Are My Lucky Star"
• "Moses Supposes"
• "Good Morning"
• "Would You?",
• "Broadway Melody Ballet"

Neo-Freudians are those individuals who once believed the basic tenants of psychoanaylsis, but saw some flaw in the theory and created their own theory of psychology. Adler is known as the first to break from Freud. He created a more social theory and argued against psychoanaylsis ever since. His theory, which he called Individual Psychology. This was not because it focused on the individual but because he saw that the people did not have internal conflict, but was a complete individual working harmousily toward a single goal. Conflict, as he saw it, was between the individual and the environment, and those who live in it. He believed in the idea of "striving for superiority" or perfection, and mental disorders are use to safe guard the individual from the reality of inferiority. He coined the terms "superiority complex" and "inferiority complex." Later in life he developed the idea of social interest, styles of life, and many other important theories. To answer your question, neo freudians, such as Karen Horney, Eric Fromm, and Harry Stack Sullivan, are also called neo adlerians. They are called this because the theories they developed after their break from psychoanaylsis were simply a retelling on Adlerian theory. One individual said that "a graduate student would run the risk of being accused of plagiarism if he were to approach another writer so closely." I feel that the term neo-adlerians is acknowledging that the ideas of the neo-freudians were nothing new, but already detailed by Alfred Adler.

Yes, of course. However, it is all about how you distribute, by any means, the copied work.

To put it simply, you become a thief when you represent copied material as your own, sell it without authorization as a copy or otherwise diminish the value of the original work.

This is a complex legal area, but if you copy a Manet for your own pleasure I doubt that the art police will come knocking at your door. However, if you get very good at it, some would become very interested in your work, legally.

Copy away, but don't misrepresent it or sell it without permission.

++++++

First of all, the question is begging to be asked: Would you want it done to you? As a muralist, I can tell you that it is not okay to recreate another's work without the expressed permission of the living or deceased artist and his chain of command. AND the art police do exist. A colleage of mine painted Disney characters in the church basement of a pre-school center. The organization caught wind of it and marched him down to prime the work out, all this after he received legal threats from them. Come to find out one of the kid's parents worked for a sub-contracted organization of Disney and innocently, happened to talk about how great it looked to her fellow workers. Don't fool yourselves. If you want to copy a work as a practice method, go for it. Do not let it outside your studio, claim it as your own or sign it.

+++++++++++++++

Yes and no. It is okay to copy anothers' work for purely instructional purpose (with you identifying the artist whom you copied). Other than that, copying is only okay with written permission from the artist. This also goes for characters, etc of the artist's creation. Fan art must be accompanied with whom the character is copyrighted to.

Ripped art has become even more serious of late with scanners and the like. They will hunt you down if you illegally copy anothers' work. (By the way, any art posted on the internet is legally copyrighted by the artist. Further details are available at DeviantArt.com's FAQ section.) Even a mural painted for free by a teacher at my elementary school of a few childrens' book characters had to be painted over. Be careful. Copyrights matter.

Advice to any artist: Mark on any website that your art is not to be copied. Digitally watermark anything. Be sure to know you have proof your work is yours. There are many helpful articles in the DA forumn. Join groups against ripped art. Don't rip art yourself.

While it is important to remember that Jefferson himself was intent on reminding others that the Declaration was a group effort, not solely his own, one can describe succinctly the manner in which "he" presented its "call for independence." That call was made in plain language (if also somewhat sophisticated by most contemporary standards), with explicit use of lofty philosophical principles, and on the basis of a discernible socio-political history to which Jefferson, and all of the Founders, were intentionally adding a grand "experiment" in self-rule.

This all depends on the criteria used to evaluate a good leader. Do you use a standard that involves character, political philosophy or how well the person adhered to his own philosophy? It's also important to remember that Jefferson had a political career long before being elected as our third president. If one wants to evaluate his leadership over the broad spectrum of his career as opposed solely to his presidency then this would also be a factor. Jefferson unlike today was not seen by all as a heroic figure. During the American Revolution he was criticized for his lack of leadership and of even abandoning Virginia during a British invasion for which he was accused of being "pusillanimous [lacking courage] conduct". This would cause his political career to halt for awhile. He would be appointed to the state legislature of Virginia after this in 1783. Everyone identifies Jefferson as being the author of the Declaration of Independence. However while not being inaccurate it is misleading. Jefferson was on a committee known by its creative name, the Committee of Five, that was formed to draft such a document. The other members being Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Robert Livingston, and Roger Sherman. Jefferson was selected to write what was always expected to be an initial draft that would be and was in fact edited by other members. The original of Jefferson was significantly different. Some even accused Jefferson of plagiarizing John Locke. Depending on your personal political philosophy Jefferson was either one of the greatest, worst, or somewhere in between other leaders. If judged on his presidency alone then a case be made that he was a good but imperfect leader. He repealed many direct taxes, repealed the illegal Alien and Sedition Act, pardoned those convicted under such Act, supported an expedition to the western frontier, fought and won the First Barbary War, and established the United States Military Academy at West point. However as with most politicians he also failed to live up to his own principles. By his own admission he acquired a huge portion of land unconstitutionally with the Louisiana Purchase. Another political fallout came when he imposed the draconian Embargo of 1807 which called for restrictions on Amercan shipping. Rhode Island was devastated by this embargo This was inconsistent with his understanding of state's rights. Jefferson also enforced the forceful removal of Indians from their lands. On a personal level, the accusation of having had an affair with his slave Sally Hemming has no conclusive evidence to support it. It was first brought up by a disgruntled muckraking political opponent. His views on slavery were realistic for his time. He was progressive in that he desired to see the awful institution abolished forever and never had anything positive to say about slavery. His language on the subject was appropriately harsh. However the realities on the ground kept him form seeing how abolition could be carried out in his lifetime. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was based on an earlier ordinance by Jefferson and was the basis for the 1787 ordinance's outlawing of slavery in the territories. Unlike Washington, Jefferson believed Congress had the authority to abolish slavery in the territories. A recent book by libertarian writer Ivan Eland called Recarving Mount Rushmore surprised many by giving a less then satisfactory appraisal of Jefferson from a libertarian criteria. Surprising because Jefferson is usually seen as a patron saint among libertarians. However Eland's analysis is fair and accurate and is worth reading since his rankings of presidents is based on different criteria then other rankings.

It means that i am loyal to this country

Plagierism is when you copy's somebody else words or work and you don't cite them you just copy everything they say like it's your own word

Plagiarism itself is grossly unethical (very bad), but not a crime ... Violation of copyright is both criminal and civil offence but is usually treated as a civil matter.

From a societal standpoint, intellectual property rights reward creative thinking by giving artists and inventors a temporary monopoly on their works, increasing value by increasing scarcity.

From a business perspective, intellectual property is an increasingly valuable commodity, as the global economy becomes more knowledge based: rather than trading in things, we trade in information.

Without laws protecting intellectual property, this valuable commodity will be reduced.

Usually codified as part of the nation's copyright laws or also can be defended under theft of intellectual property.

Using others' intellectual property tends to be more effective and efficient than constantly creating your own--reinventing the wheel, as it were. The only concern is that your use should be legal, either through an exemption in the law or (more likely) permission from the rightsholder.

I'm trying to imagine a world where you can never use anyone else's intellectual property. You could never read a book or magazine--you'd just have to write your own. There would be no hit songs, because radio stations would have to create their own new songs, and besides, you'd have to invent a radio to listen to it on, anyway. We can't use this website, or the patented computers we're reading it on.

Sharing ideas is vital. You just don't want to mess with the creator's rights when you do it.

: Plagiarism can be more than simply an 'academic crime.' If the publication that was plagiarized was copyrighted it is also a violation of Civil Law. ___ Leaving the legal aspects aside, the key point for work handed in at schools and colleges is that it is supposed to be original: it is supposed to be your own work, done by you. Plagiarized assignments are about on a par with (supposedly) scientific papers with faked results.

The most legitimate answer to this question is no.

Intellectual Property refers to works created by inventors, authors and artists. these works are unique and have value in the market place. In our daily lives, we are surrounded by things that are protected by IP. Your school bags, your shoes and even your socks are protected by Intellectual Property rights. Nike, Bata or Adidas, for example, are all protected by a group of legal rights.

Answer

Copyright basically in simple form of words means you are not allowed to copy someone elses words, letters, photos/images/ pictures without their permission.

If there's no court order, you're not. see link

This is not exactly true. If you are not court ordered to pay child support and you do voluntarily, the parent with custody of the child must write a letter verifying that you pay child support on your own recognizence and have it notarized. It has to been the custodial parent who takes the letter to the notary and she must sign it in front of that notary as well as show identification to verify who she is.

Jefferson is referring to King George III of England in his "He has" statements. Jefferson is telling the world of the offenses that the British monarchy has imposed on the colonies.

Related issues like this you can go to find answers in myelibrary, there are a lot of questions about all kinds of solution, you can register an account to watch carefully, hope to help you a lot.

Effective paragraphs are characterized by a clear main idea, cohesion, and coherence. Each paragraph should begin with a topic sentence that introduces the main point, followed by supporting sentences that provide evidence or examples. Additionally, transitions between sentences and paragraphs enhance flow, ensuring that ideas connect logically. Lastly, maintaining a consistent tone and style throughout strengthens the overall impact of the writing.

Plagiarism?