Chimpanzees

East Africa is a relative geographic term and as such is interpreted differently by different sources.

Wikipedia defines it as: "East Africa is often used to specifically refer to the area now comprising the countries of Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda and, in a wider sense, also Burundi, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Sudan, and Somalia (including the self-declared republic of Somaliland"

As such the question can be answered as follows:

Kenya - 582,650 km2

Tanzania - 945,087 km2

Uganda - 236,040 km2

Burundi - 27,830 km2

Djibouti - 23,000 km2

Eritrea - 121,320 km2

Ethiopia - 1,127,127 km2

Rwanda - 26,338 km2

Sudan - 2,505,810 km2

Somalia - 637,657 km2

A total of : 6,232,859 km2 or 2,406,520 miles2

Today, evolutionists insist that the underlying similarity of all animals, including man, and our ability to arrange and classify them into groups, is compelling evidence for their progressive evolution from a common ancestor. They insist that there is simply no other thinkable explanation for their similarities. Evolutionists argue further that the degree of similarity between any two animals attests to their degree of evolutionary "relatedness," and thus how recently they separated from a common ancestor. They are quite certain, for example, that the similarities between apes and humans prove they evolved from a common ape-like ancestor "only" 2 or 3 million years ago. Perhaps you heard the story of the evolutionist who dug up a fossilized fragment of an ape's jaw and promptly declared it to be an ancestor of man -- he was so excited about the find he said, "I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it." http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro05.html Since evolutionists generally do not believe that man evolved from any ape that is now living, they look to extinct apes in the fossil record to provide them with their desired evidence. Specifically, they look for any anatomical feature that looks "intermediate" between that of apes and man. Fossil apes having such features are declared to be ancestral to man (or at least collateral relatives) and are called hominids. Living apes, on the other hand, are not considered to be "hominids" they only sort of look like humans. Still, evolutionists are willing to accept certain trivial similarities between extinct apes and men as "proof" of ancestry. The most eagerly sought after evidence in fossil "hominids" is any anatomical feature that suggests bipedality (the ability to walk on two legs). http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro19.html The "missing links" are missing. And unfortunately, the field of paleoanthropology has been riddled with fraudulent claims of finding the missing link between humans and primates, to the extent that fragments of human skeletons have been combined with other species such as pigs and apes and passed off as legitimate. The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes that humans and apes derive from an apelike ancestor that lived on earth a few million years ago. The theory states that man, through a combination of environmental and genetic factors, emerged as a species to produce the variety of ethnicities seen today, while modern apes evolved on a separate evolutionary pathway. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof. http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htm

Another Answer:

Man did not evolve from apes but from a common ancestor that evolved not only into apes but also into man. Ken Miller, who in a court of law, helped defeat Intelligent Design teaching proposals in schools, best explains in his website at http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/. Genetics proves humans and apes share a common ancestor.

2. Explorative - They employ the scientific approach in exploring a problem and design experiments to test their theories.

3. Persistent

4. Creative - To solve a problem, they often have to be creative in uncharted territory especially in astronomy and physics.

5. Analytical - They observe what is happening and analyze the problem to come up with solutions.

Scientists differ from engineers in that scientists can work in the theoretical realm, while engineers are applied scientists in that they have to apply the principles of physics and math to solve daily problems. So they might work together as a team lead by the scientist to carry out an experiment for example.

Paine predicts that Britain will tax the Americans heavily and what Thomas Paine also states; "to BIND us [American colonists] in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER."

Britain has a large lack in respect towards America and Paine believes that some Americans do not see the evil in Britain and have hopes that the enemy (Britain) will be merciful.