Citation and References

Importance Of Business

The importance of business is that it provides products or services to customers. These products or services in the present day world are provided by entrepreneurs who organize, manage and assume the risk of starting businesses mainly for earning profit. Business makes the best possible use of scarce resources such as men, machines and materials for the production of goods. The importance of business can be judged from the following activities undertaken by the business.

1. Production of goods

The raw material producing industries such as agriculture, mining, forestry, fishing, etc., provide raw materials for the manufacturers of consumer and producer goods. For instance, agriculture provides food such as grains! vegetables. Mines provide metals which are used in factories and firms. Coal, another product of n,ne is a very useful source of power Forestry, provides us timber 'Which is needed the construction of building, furnitures, paper, etc.

Manufacturing uses the raw materials of agriculture, mining, forestry, fishing. etc., and makes a variety of consumer and capita! goods which are needed by the consumers. Without manufacturing, the business will stand idle. There would be no automobiles, no roads! no airplanes, no electric power, etc. To sum up, the Industrial occupations which are concerned with the growing, extracting and manufacturing of material goods are corner stone of business.

2. Distribution aspect of business

The distribution aspect of business is very complex. The goods which are produced should reach the consumers at the right place, right time and at right price also. Business due to seif-interest of earning profits, provides goods to the people both within and outside the country. The transport industries facilitate the movement of goods from one place to another where they are wanted. Finance, banking and insurance greaUy contribute in the financing of business. Without banks, investment and insurance companies, commerce and industry would not have developed on an extensive scale.

3. Business supplies services

Services occupy an important place in business life. Though the service organizations do not contribute directly in the production of goods but they facilitate in the production and distribution of goods to the customer& The major services which are growing in importance with each passing year are banking and finance, insurance, medical and health legal, engineering and other professionals, domestic servants, education, automobile repairs. etc., etc, the services which perform simple or difficult tasks for earning money are regarded an important part of business.

4. Business has helped in raising standard of living

Business has helped people to earn a living either as owners of business or as employees. The mass production of standard goods! specialization, automation have increased the incomes of those who are directly or indirectly engaged in business. Higher incomes have led to the increase in the standard of living of the people. Business also pays a large share of taxes to a government

5. Creation of customers

The business of today is creating markets for its customers all over the world by introducing new products, new methods of distribution such as e-corrmerce, tele shopping etc.

Criticism of business.

There is no doubt that modern business has raised material standard of living of the people but it has also created discontentment in the economic and social system. The main criticisms directed towards business are as under:

1. Business of today has become too much profit oriented. The employees are usually exploited by the owners

2. Business is guilty by polluting air and water which directly affects the health of the people.

3. Human values and worker comforts are ignored by business.

4. Business, due to self-interest, often ignores the welfare of the consumers and supplIes adufterated goods.

5. The communication media such as television, radio magazines, newspapers. etc.. attempt to sell their goods or services by appealing to ba hurnan emotions, People due to the influence of communication media are losing sight of spiritual values. They are becoming too much materialistic minded and have lost peace of mind

Conclusion

We do agree that the modern business has increased the comforts of life by supply the desired quality of products but it has obligations towards nation also.Henry Ford is right in saying that, "Business is not more money chasing but it should also aim in serving the community".

Note: This answer was originally written by WikiAnswers contributor Chris Bennett.

For more than a century various researchers have been trying to bring attention to potential cannabis references within the Old Testament. "Like the ancient Greeks, the Old Testament Israelites were surrounded by marijuana-using peoples. A British physician, Dr. C. Creighton, concluded in 1903 that several references to marijuana can be found in the Old Testament. Examples are the "honeycomb" referred to in the Song of Solomon, 5:1, and the "honeywood" in I Samuel 14: 25-45" (Consumer Reports 1972). Of the historical material indicating the Hebraic use of cannabis, the strongest and most profound piece of evidence was established in 1936 by Sula Benet (a.k.a. Sara Benetowa), a Polish etymologist from the Institute of Anthropological Sciences in Warsaw. Benet later stated that: "In the original Hebrew text of the Old Testament there are references to hemp, both as incense, which was an integral part of religious celebration, and as an intoxicant"(Benet 1975). Through comparative etymological study, Bennett documented that in the Old Testament and in its Aramaic translation, the Targum Onculos, hemp is referred to as q'neh bosm which (variously translated as kaneh bosem, keneh bosem, kaniebosm ) and is also rendered in traditional Hebrew as kannabos or kannabus. The root " kan" in this construction means "reed" or "hemp", while "bosm" means "aromatic". This word appeared in Exodus 30:23, Song of Songs 4:14., Isaiah 43:24, Jeremiah 6:20, Ezekiel 27:19. Benet's etymological research regarding the Hebrew terms q'eneh bosem' and q'eneh'was based upon tracing the modern word 'cannabis' back through history to show the similarities between the cognitive pronunciation of cannabis and q'eneh bosem' and as well as compared the term to the names used for cannabis by contemporary kingdoms, such as the Assyrian and Babylonians terms for the plant 'qunubu' . In fact the term "q'neh bosem' is the Hebrew transliteration of an earlier Indo-European term for the plant 'canna' . This term left traces through the vernacular 'an' seen in various modern terms for c'an'nabis, such as the Indian bh'a'ng, the French ch'an'vre, the Dutch c'an'vas and the German h'an'f. This use of an Indo-European word in the Semitic language shows that the ritual use of cannabis came to the Hebrews from foreign sources and as an item of trade, it retained the core aspects of its original name. Indeed, in both the Jeremiah and Ezekiel references referred to by Benet, cannabis is identified as coming from a foreign land, and indeed as the additional references noted by Benet tell when put into the context of the Biblical storyline, this foreign association with the plant may in fact have been the cause of its disfavor amongst the ancient Hebrews. Initially appearing in favor, as part of a list of ingredients in a holy anointing oil, which when bestowed upon a chosen individual made him 'the anointed one', which in Hebrew is rendered the 'Messiah' and later in Greek the 'Christ'. But this love affair was not to last… As Prof. Carl Ruck a linguist and mythologist, along with his equally educated co-authors have also noted: "Chrismation was ...a mode of administering healing balms. In the Old Testament, chrismation involves pouring the anointing oil over the head, which functions to purify (obviously in a spiritual sense, not to cleanse physically) and to confer power, strength, or majesty. Its most common occurrence is the coronation of kings, which sometimes is accomplished by Yahweh, himself; but priests and prophet-shamans are also anointed, as also are objects to set them aside from profane use. In Exodus 30,23 sq., Yahweh specifies the ingredients for the chrism, making clear that such unguents contained herbal additives to the oil: Cannabissativa (kaneh bosm, usually translated "aromatic cane") is combined with perfuming spices (cinnamon, cassia, and myrrh) in oil.

"The psychoactivity of the "spices" in the anointing oil, in addition to the Cannabis, deserves attention. Cinnamon and cassia are mild to moderate stimulants. Myrrh is reputed to have medical properties. ...

",,,,Cannabis… appears several times through out the Old Testament. The word in question is kaneh bosm, … now translated as "calamus," the mistranslation starting as early as the Septuagint. Kaneh bosm occurs also in Song of Songs 4.14, where it grows in an orchard of exotic fruits, herbs, and spices: on the Song of Songs as an ethnobotanical encomium of the entheogen. It occurs also in Isaiah 43,24 where Yahweh lists amongst the slights not received in sacrifice… and Jeremiah 6,20, where Yahweh, displeased with his people, rejects such an offering; and Ezekiel 27.19, where it occurs in a catalogue of the luxurious items in the import trade of Tyre. Benet concludes that these references confirm that hemp was used by the Hebrews as incense and intoxicant. This conclusion has since been affirmed by other scholars." (Ruck et al. 2001) These passages are particularly telling of how the disappearance of cannabis from the Old Testament script came about. Isaiah 43:24 "Thou hast bought me no sweet cane (q'neh with money, neither hast thou filled me with the fat of thy sacrifices: but thou hast made me to serve with thy sins, thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities." Here Yahweh condemns the Hebrews for not bringing both cannabis and enough of the lavish animal sacrifices common in the Old Testament to him. A further reading of the texts shows that these items are being sacrificed in honor of competing deities. A situation that is compounded through the words of the monotheistic reformer Jeremiah " To what purpose cometh there to me incense from Sheba, and the sweet cane (q'neh) from a far country? your burnt offerings [are] not acceptable, nor your sacrifices sweet unto me. (Jeremiah 6;20) . Here just prior to the final fall of Hebrew kingdoms, the pagan and foreign associations with the plant finally drive it underground. But it must be understood that from the time of Moses and throughout the kingdom period, the use of cannabis in a ritual context had continued. (Bennett and McQueen, 2001) A theme more fully explored and expanded upon in my own book, Sex, Drugs, Violence and the Bible co-authored with Neil McQueen (Forbidden Fruit Publishing 2001). Following in the footsteps of Benet's research, we were able to follow the history of the sacred anointing oil into the early Christian period, particularly amongst heretical Gnostic Christian sects, that along with pagan cults, were brutally banned at the inception of the Dark Ages and the rise of Catholicism. As noted the term 'Christ' itself is Greek rendering of the Hebrew 'Messiah' and this means the 'anointed one' making reference back to the original anointing oil as described in Exodus 30:23 . Indeed even in the New Testament Jesus does not baptize any of his own disciples, but rather in the oldest of the synoptic Gospels Jesus sends out his followers to heal with the anointing oil "they cast out many devils, and aanointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them." (Mark 6:13). Likewise, after Jesus' passing, James suggests that anyone of the Christian community who was sick should call to the elders to anoint him with oil in the name of Jesus (James 5:14). "Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord." It should also be understood that in the ancient world, diseases such as epilepsy were attributed to demonic possession, and to cure somebody of such an illness, even with the aid of certain herbs, was the same as exorcism, or miraculously healing them. Interestingly, cannabis has been shown to be effective in the treatment of not only epilepsy, but many of the other ailments that Jesus and the disciples healed people of, such as skin diseases (Matthew 8, 10, 11; Mark 1; Luke 5, 7, 17), eye problems (John 9:6-15), and menstrual problems (Luke 8:43-48). According to ancient Christian documents, even the healing of cripples could be attributed to the use of the holy oil. "Thou holy oil given unto us for sanctification… thou art the straightener of the crooked limbs" (The Acts of Thomas).

One ancient Christian text, The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles, which is older than the New Testament, estimated to have been recorded in the second century AD, has Jesus giving the disciples an "unguent box" and a "pouch full of medicine" with instructions for them to go into the city and heal the sick.

As Jesus and his followers began to spread the healing knowledge of cannabis around the ancient world, the singular Christ became the plural term "Christians," that is, those who had been smeared or anointed with the holy oil. As the New Testament explains: "The anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit-just as it has taught you, remain in him" (1 John 2:27).

The Christians, the "smeared or anointed ones," received "knowledge of all things" by this "anointing from the Holy One" (1 John 2:20). Thereafter, they needed no other teacher, and were endowed with their own spiritual knowledge. "Residues of cannabis, moreover, have been detected in vessels from Judea and Egypt in a context indicating its medicinal, as well as visionary, use."(Ruck 2003) In the first few centuries AD, Christian Gnostic groups such as the Archontics, Valentians and Sethians rejected water baptism as superfluous, referring to it as an "incomplete baptism".( The Paraphrase of Shem. )In the tractate, the Testimony of Truth, water Baptism is rejected with a reference to the fact that Jesus baptized none of his disciples.(Rudolph, 1987) Being "anointed with unutterable anointing", the so-called "sealings" recorded in the Gnostic texts, can be seen as a very literal event. "There is water in water, there is fire in chrism." (Gospel of Philip). "The anointing with oil was the introduction of the candidate into unfading bliss, thus becoming a Christ." (Mead, 1900) "The oil as a sign of the gift of the Spirit was quite natural within a semetic framework, and therefore the ceremony is probably very early. . . In time the biblical meaning became obscured." (Chadwick, 1967)

In the Gospel of Philip it is written that the initiates of the empty rite of Baptism:

"go down into the water and come up without having received anything. . . The anointing (chrisma) is superior to baptism. For from the anointing we were called 'anointed ones' (Christians), not because of the baptism. And Christ also was [so] named because of the anointing, for the Father anointed the son, and the son anointed the apostles, and the apostles anointed us. [Therefore] he who has been anointed has the All. He has the resurrection, the light. . . the Holy Spirit. . . [If] one receives this unction, this person is no longer a Christian but a Christ."

The apocryphal book, The Acts of Thomas, refers to the ointment's entheogenic effects as being specifically derived from a certain plant:

Holy oil, given us for sanctification, hidden mystery in which the cross was shown us, you are the unfolder of the hidden parts. You are the humiliator of stubborn deeds. You are the one who shows the hidden treasures. You are the plant of kindness. Let your power come by this [unction].

Although the idea that Jesus and his disciples used a healing cannabis ointment may seem far-fetched at first, when weighed against the popular alternative (one that is held by millions of believers) that Jesus performed his healing miracles magically, through the power invested in him by the omnipotent Lord of the Universe, the case for ancient accounts of medicinal cannabis seems a far more likely explanation. When one considers that Jesus himself may have healed and initiated disciples with such topical cannabis preparations, the modern reintroduction of cannabis based medicines becomes, if not a miracle, at least a profound revelation.. In light of this profound history, some have come to see the use of cannabis as a freedom of religion issue. But after 15 years of researching the cross-cultural history of cannabis, and following it's use from the stone age to present, I have come to see that the right to cannabis is even more fundamental than religious freedoms, for humanity created religion, but no matter what god you believe in, you had better believe that god created cannabis. Even from an atheistic standpoint, from the cross cultural perspective, as possibly our oldest cultivated crop, humanity has had a evolutionary partnership with this plant that stretches back more than 10,000 years. Indeed humanity has a natural indigenous right to all the plants of the earth, all people and all plants, any law that stands in the way of that natural relationship is an abomination to both God and Nature.

I assume you mean a debtor who has had a judgment and a judgment lien entered against him.

In this scenario, there would be certain situations wherein the judgment lien debtor's child interests could be affected, although no true legal liability would attach to the debtor's child's interests. However, these would only extend to property owned in some way jointly with the debtor himself or herself.

Assuming you refer to real property, if a debtor and the debtor's child were to own real property in a joint tenancy with right of survivorship, such a judgment lien could attach to and encumber the property. This is similarly true with a tenancy in common.

If possible, the lien would only encumber the real property to the extent of the debtor's property interest. And, if at all possible, any kind of equitable partition that could be ordered by the court would be ordered upon motion, to sever the debtor's child's property interest from the encumbrance.

Since partition is often not practical, a lien against the debtor as joint owner could adversely affect--practically but not legally--the debtor's child's property interests. This could extend to foreclosure of the lien; however, the court could be moved in several ways to facilitate preservation of the debtor's child's property interests to the greatest extent possible.

A general and inclusive group of laws adopted, at least partially, by all the states to further uniformity and fair dealing in business and commercial transactions. It is relevant only in the US.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of suggestedlaws relating to commercial transactions. The UCC was one of many uniform codes that grew out of a late nineteenth-century movement toward uniformity among state laws. In 1890 the American Bar Association, an association of lawyers, proposed that states identify areas of law that could be made uniform throughout the nation, prepare lists of such areas, and suggest appropriate legislative changes. In 1892 the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) met for the first time in Saratoga, New York. Only seven states sent representatives to the meeting. In 1986 the NCCUSL offered up its first act, the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Act. The NCCUSL drafted a variety of other Uniform Acts. Some of these dealt with commerce, including the Uniform Conditional Sales Act and the Uniform Trust Receipts Act. The uniform acts on commercial issues were fragmented by the 1930s and in 1940, the NCCUSL proposed revising the commerce-oriented uniform codes and combining them into one uniform set of model laws. In 1941 the American Law Institute (ALI) joined the discussion, and over the next several years lawyers, judges, and professors in the ALI and NCCUSL prepared a number of drafts of the Uniform Commercial Code. In September 1951 a final draft of the UCC was completed and approved by the American Law Institute (ALI) and the NCCUSL, and then by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association. After some additional amendments and changes, the official edition, with explanatory comments, was published in 1952. Pennsylvania was the first state to adopt the UCC, followed by Massachusetts. By 1967 the District of Columbia and all the states, with the exception of Louisiana, had adopted the UCC in whole or in part. Louisiana eventually adopted all the articles in the UCC except articles 2 and 2A. The UCC is divided into nine articles, each containing provisions that relate to a specific area of Commercial Law. Article 1, General Provisions, provides definitions and general principles that apply to the entire code. Article 2 covers the sale of goods. Article 3, Commercial Paper, addresses negotiable instruments, such as promissory notes and checks. Article 4 deals with banks and their handling of checks and other financial documents. Article 5 provides model laws on letters of credit, which are promises by a bank or some other party to pay the purchases of a buyer without delay and without reference to the buyer's financial solvency. Article 6, on bulk transfers, imposes an obligation on buyers who order the major part of the inventory for certain types of businesses. Most notably, article 6 provisions require that such buyers notify creditors of the seller of the inventory so that creditors can take steps to see that the seller pays her debts when she receives payments from the buyer. Article 7 offers rules on the relationships between buyers and sellers and any transporters of goods, called carriers. These rules primarily cover the issuance and transfer of warehouse receipts and bills of lading. A bill of lading is a document showing that the carrier has delivered an item to a buyer. Article 8 contains rules on the issuance and transfer of stocks, bonds, and other investment Securities. Article 9, Secured Transactions, covers security interests in real property. A security interest is a partial or total claim to a piece of property to secure the performance of some obligation, usually the payment of a debt. This article identifies when and how a secured interest may be created and the rights of the creditor to foreclose on the property if the debtor defaults on his obligation. The article also establishes which creditors can collect first from a defaulting debtor. The ALI and the NCCUSL periodically review and revise the UCC. Since the code was originally devised, the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association has approved two additional articles: article 2A on Personal Property leases, and article 4A on fund transfers. Article 2A establishes model rules for the leasing or renting of personal property (as opposed to real property, such as houses and apartments). Article 4A covers transfers of funds from one party to another party through a bank. This article is intended to address the issues that arise with the use of new technologies for handling money. Most states have adopted at least some of the provisions in the UCC. The least popular article has been article 6 on bulk transfers. These provisions require the reporting of payments made, which many legislators consider an unnecessary intrusion on commercial relationships.

Clarence Earl Gideon won. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that Gideon had been denied due process when he was refused his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and had been unjustly convicted in his first trial. The case was remanded to the Florida state courts for a new trial. The jury in the second trial deliberated only one hour before acquitting Gideon.

As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, indigent felony defendants must receive free counsel.

Case Citation:

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

When asked 'Briefly describe your relationship with this person' on a job application, the employer simply wants a context of either job related or personal relationship. Let's say you give:

• Your Neighbor - write next to name, Personal Contact
• Your Great Aunt Mary - write next to name, Personal Contact
• Your Landlord - write next to name, Personal / Business Contact
• Your Current Supervisor - write next to name, Current Employment
• Your ex-Boss, ex-Supervisor - write next to name, Last Employer
• A Business Person or other professional you've known in the community - write next to name, Business Community

Always use the full name of the person.

Always write formally - not My Auntie, or my uncle's step son by his 3rd marriage.

Always give a contact telephone number for each reference.

If asked, put how many years you have known the person... a rough estimate.