0
Nutritional Measurement
The nutritional content information is provided on the side of the label of foods you purchase at the grocery store and is required by the FDA. The figures are based on a 2000 calorie diet. The serving size is provided on the label i.e. 2 crackers or 1 cup. Included on the label that is required by the FDA will provide consumers with the Total Fat, Saturated Fat, Trans Fat, Cholesterol, Sodium, Total Carbohydrate, Protein, different vitamins and other necessary information about food content. The ingredients are also listed on the label in order from highest quantity to lowest quantity.
1,600 Questions
Why can a calorie be called a complex unit of measure?
A calorie is considered a complex unit of measure because it represents the amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. This definition involves multiple factors like the substance being heated (water), the change in temperature, and the specific metric unit (gram and Celsius). It describes a specific amount of energy rather than a simple, easy-to-conceptualize value.
How do you convert litres to gallons?
1 liter = 0.2641 gallons, thus in order to convert litres to gallons simply multiply the number of litres by 0.2641.
To convert liters to gallons:
- liters x 0.22 = Imperial gallons
- liters x 0.264 = US gallons
Vitamin C itself is a white crystalline powder. When found in fruits and vegetables, vitamin C can often be associated with various colors depending on the specific fruit or vegetable it is present in.
How many Weight Watchers points plus in a Chicken pecan salad from Cheddars?
11 without dressing, add the dressing points seperately. That's what I did.
How much energy is stored in a computer?
The energy stored in a computer is typically in the form of electrical energy, stored in the battery or power supply unit. The amount of energy stored depends on the capacity of the battery or power supply, which can vary based on the device and its specifications.
How do you prepare questionnaire on milk products for survey?
first analyse ur company, what are the demand in the market, then make ur own question related to ur analysis.
If the sugar content is given as a concentration, then the size of the bottle should not matter. If the residual sugar, for example, is 0.5 mg/mL, then it's 0.5 mg/mL regardless of the size of the bottle. If, however, the sugar content is reported as the total sugar present in the bottle, then the two figures can be different, because of rounding error. If the smaller bottle contains 0.45 mg of sugar, that can be reported as zero (which is permitted by law). The larger bottle will have 0.90 mg of sugar, and that can be rounded to 1.0.
The question cannot be answered for two reasons:
- There are no units for the "30x30" in the question.
- "30x30" suggests an area, a 2-dimensional measure rather than a length, such as a yard.
A pound is 16 ounces (oz), so 200 ounces is equal to 12.5 pounds.
Where were potatoes domesticated?
Potatoes were domesticated in Ireland thousands of years ago by Keltic tribes
What type of food should take up the most space on your plate fruit and veggies meat or grains?
Fruits and vegetables
Potatoes are carbohydrates. Proteins come from meat, fish, and some vegetables.
Is there more protein in 1 pound of chicken or 1 pound of beef?
This is going to depend upon the amount of fat in the item. If protien is found in muscle then it follows that there is more protein in fillet mignon than in rib-eye steaks. There would also be more protien in 95% fat-free ground beef than in 80% fat-free ground beet.
When it comes to chicken, the same holds true. Those cuts of meat with less fat have more protein.
Now comes the water part. Often grocery stores will sell poultry with "water added" with the idea that it keeps the meat moist while it cooks. That added water adds weight but does not add protien so you have less protein per pound when water is added to the meat.
Also, almost all grocery stores sell beef and chicken with bone-in as well as boneless. Obviously you are not eating the bone so the weight you are buying is greater than the amount of edible material in the container.
In the end it all depends on the amount of fat and water in the specimen. I would guess that 1 pound of beef jerky would have the most amount of protein but chicken jerky would be likely be just as equal.
What foods are high in protein and fiber?
The highest protein foods are in the meat and bean and dairy groups, although we get a significant amount of protein from grain. High-protein, low-fat meats include turkey breast, shellfish, lean fin fish (cod, roughly, and others) and egg whites. The high-protein, low-fat dairy products are fat-free milk, yogurts and cheeses. Dried beans are fat-free soy milk are also in that category, as well as protein-fortified pasta. To make these foods high in calories, increase the size of your portions. Also remember that cooking methods significantly affect the fat content of food.
no
What is often mistakenly regarded as being based on science?
This question can generate many differing views. Some are mentioned below.
Answer 1 Intelligent design is pseudoscientific because it is based on the notion that the universe is so complex that it needed a creator to create it in order to exist as such. However, this premise is invalid as a scientific hypothesis since we cannot prove this by testing and measuring some arbitrary measurement: we can't say "Oh, we need a God to make this galaxy because it's just so big and too hard for us to understand! The results from the deus ex machina indicate this!" Besides, if you can't prove the validity of the existence of a universal creator, then logically you can never prove or disprove a system which is wholly depedent on the existence of said creator. For these reasons, you can't go around saying intelligent design is solid science and a plausible alternative to Darwin's theory of natural selection.
Answer 2
Just as Creatisonism is "not supported" by science, neither is evolution. Darwin had first thought of the idea while researching various specimens on his expedition to catalog new organisms. He had developed natural selection as an alternative to Lamarckism, which is the inheritance of acquired traits ( Ex: I have huge muscles, so my kid will have huge muscles). However, years after publishing his idea, he o that natural selection would take much longer to have happened than thought, so he went back to lamarckism. Yet ignorantly, scientists have developed the discarded idea since. The idea of the universe being 15 billion years old has also been broken by "sciences" own advances. The idea is that everything is moving away from everything else as a result of the Big Bang. To support this idea, the theory of redshift was developed, which states that the age of an object can be reasoned by calculating the amount of light being received from that object. This idea worked well for a while, until quasars were discovered. Quasars are bright , pulsating stars found at the far ends of the universe. By using the theory of redshift, some of these objects were found to be up to 24 billion years, nearly double the "age" of the universe! Lastly the problem with carbon dating. Although thought to be very accurate, this method isn't as accurate as credited. For the first part, the exact radioactive life of any element is unknown, as no human can live for more than a thousand years, and secondly, these dating methods give various options for the age of a fossil, out of which scientists are able to choose. This completely discards any dating method as unreliable. There is much more that disproves evolution, but these are the main points. If you want to discuss this any further post on my wall, my username of course is Zadkiel1997, and i close the answer to this question with another. What do you believe?
Answer 3
THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING "BASED" ON SCIENCE AND BEING "CONFIRMED BY SCIENCE" OR BEING AN "ACCEPTED HYPOTHESIS". IT IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT FOR AN ASSERTION TO BE "BASED" ON SCIENCE. MANY LIES AND FALSEHOOD HAVE BEEN BASED ON SCIENCE...IE. RACISM, SEXISM, EUGENICS, "THE GAY GENE" (NO BIAS INTENDED-NO PROBLEM WITH HOMOSEXUALS-JUST ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THE SEARCH AND PROPOSED SEXUALITY GENE DOES NOT EXIST AND IS USED AS PROPAGANDA FOR THE UNINFORMED MASSES TO ACCEPT BECAUSE THE AVERAGE PERSON IS NOT A "GENETICIST" AND DOESN'T UNDERSTAND BIOLOGICAL LANGUAGE AND OPINIONS.)
BEING CONFIRMED OR ACCEPTED IS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT. BUT HEY RACISM WAS ACCEPTED FOR AT LEAST 600 YEARS AND STILL IS TO SOME UNINFORMED PEOPLE.
