Repossession

Why would someone give something to someone with getting paid. It sounds like the car was a gift.

No, the lender can not have you put in jail because they have a lien on you car. They can press charges against you in many states if your vehicle is up for repossession and you attempt to hide it or hinder the agency hired to secure it from recovering your car. Or, if the lender secures a replevin and you still refuse to turn over the vehicle, you will go to jail then for contempt of court.

You are allowed to remove any personal possessions from a vehicle that has been impounded without paying. You are not allowed to remove any part of the car like speakers, spare tire, seat covers, etc...

If there is a judgment AGAINST you for fraud, then NO, such a judgment WILL NOT be discharged.

Contact a local repo company they will tell you what you need.Good Luck.

You may want to check your state's statutes. In most states, repo companies can charge a fee and it's completely legal. If, in your state, it's not legal, you can file a grand theft report with the police agency governing the jurisdiction where the company does business. You can also sue them in civil court for the fees plus court costs. However, make sure first that charging the fees was illegal.

Depends on the language on the note you signed. Some have a grace period and some do not. Read the note you signed. My advice is to not let this happen. The creditor does not want to repossess your vehicle any more than you want it repossessed. It will cost him money to sell your car and then try to recoup the balance on the loan between what the car sells for and what you owe, which you will, in the end, pay. Go sit down with the creditor and work something out if at all possible. You know your credit will be ruined for 7 years if you do not fix this problem. I agree about dealing with the creditor; if you are just waiting for them to pick up the car, why not return it now? At least you won't be using something you do not own and/or it can be returned in decent condition. As with most things, the sooner you take care of a problem, the better off you are.

It is called the Good Samaritan Law and SB 911 in the State of California. It basically encourages citizens to get emergency medical training such as CPR so they can render aid in emergency situations.

not

Vehicles cannot legally be "repossessed" due to a lack of insurance. Re-possession can occur only when there is a default in the payment contract and the original owner (the lender) recovers their property from the defaulter.

The Plates are not 'your' plates, they belong to the STATE that you have registered your car with. If the STATE wants their plates back for any reason, they could have the POLICE get them from you by a number of ways.

So to answer your question... Yes the POLICE can take the "STATE'S" license plates from your car if they are instructed to do so by the STATE.

Here is the bottom line on towing laws in Richmond, Virginia. -- If you ask a towing company to tow your vehicle, no regulations apply. -- Property owners may get "trespassing" vehicles towed from their properties. Per City ordinance, there should be a sign telling folks that the parking area is for customers/residents only, and giving a contact phone number to get the car back. If the sign is not there, the parking lot owner can still get trespassing vehicles towed, but there is no fee to the car owner. -- If you park your car using on-street parking, make sure you look signs limiting how long your car can stay, or no parking for street cleaning, etc. But don't leave your car in the same on-street spot for more than ten days, or it might get towed as an abandoned vehicle. -- The City Attorney's Office ((804) 646-7940) can give details.

It is impossible to determine from the info given in the question why no arrests were made. In order to answer the question, one would have to know the purpose of the search warrant. Was it simply to seize the illicit drugs or was it done to identify who "possessed" them? The knowledge gained by the authorities during the successful drug seizure CAN be used as a basis for future law enforcement action.

In the book, Chastity and her mother have been on the run since Chass was a baby, assuming new identities in every town. She doesn't know why they are running, who her father is, or even her real name. On the night of Chass's sixteenth birthday, her mother disappears. Police find her abandoned car, blood matching her DNA, and a purse containing six ID cards. Chass doesn't believe her mother is dead, only that she had to run again. If Chastity doesn't find her mother in six days, she'll be put into foster care.She is chased by people who are trying to kill her while she is look for her mom. Once her mom gave her a key to open a deposit box , she only found an old CD , she played and it was a clu of a murder. On the tape, Kyle Van Epps told Chas's mom that he killed some girl he used to go out with and that he and 2 of his best friends were there on the crime scene. Chas noticed that the people that were chasing her worked for Van Epps Company; Chas's mom send her a text message saying that she was okay and that she will meet her @ midnight on a bar. When she got there , her mom was there with Van Epps and he told her to give him the tape or her mom will die. Chas gave him the tape but he ran away with her mom and the tape(this part is way longer but it is a lil summary so .... ). At the end, Van Epps went to jail, her mom was rescued and she was okay. But she still had the doubt of who her father was if it was Van Epps or not ? or if Van Epps and her mom were married and got divorced?..... but none of those questions are right. Her father was the music producer who recorded the tape but he got killed by Van Epps , Van Epps always know her mom got the tape and that's why they were always on the run. He even told her what her real name was but she changed it to Chassity Pureheart because that know she was known as by everyone else.

Not really sure what is being asked. Is the questioner referring to the RICO statutes (Racketerring Influenced Corrupt Organizations)?

The person doing the actual repossession has to be where the car is. Either YOU go to Kansas or hire someone in Kansas to do the dirty job and you go pick it up. Email me if you need more info. BTW, repoing ain't cheap. Expect to pay $500.00 and up PLUS transport if needed.

Generally it's required by law, by the bylaws of a corp, an employer, bascially anyone who handles large sums of $$$ that could be stolen

Yes, it is a common practice especially when it relates to credit card debt.

Yeah, so police cars just have mot's. It's always been like that and will in all probability always remain be that way, too

1 cent

A secured creditor is one who has a contract with you that says if you fail to pay, the creditor can take a specified item you own to satisfy the debt. Most common are purchase-money loans, such as mortgages or car loans, but it can be any item.

The difference between the Payment of Wages Act and the Minimum Wages Act is in what these acts enforce. The Payment of Wages Act ensures when payments should be made, how they should be made, and limits deductions. The Minimum Wages Act ensures that workers in certain industries are paid at least a certain predetermined amount.

You must ask your local authorities, it may differ from county to county