Are Turkish people considered middle eastern?
Turkey(Turkiye) is a land where Middle East,Asia,Europe meets.
Original Turks are not Middle Easterns, they are EuroAsians.
But in todays Turkey, there are too many different ethnicities living, like in USA.
Basicly, people who lives in the east side,are called Kurdish and they are Middle Easterns. People who lives in the north and west are more like EuroAsians. They are called Anatolians.
Its really hard to talk about the majority of the country because its really mixed.
Bur original Turks are EuroAsians.Their culture is very familiar with Greeks or Italians. Most of them have colored eyes like my mom,and white bright skin.
So you may meet a Turk who is more like a Middle Eastern or Europian, its basicly your judgement or his own opinion on how he sees himself.
I hope this answer helped.
What movie and television projects has Mehmet Akif Alakurt been in?
Mehmet Akif Alakurt has: Played Ali Kirmen in "Kirik ayna" in 2002. Performed in "Metro palas" in 2004. Played Kenan in "Zeytin dali" in 2005. Played Ahmet Gesili in "Haci" in 2006. Played Boran in "Sila" in 2006. Played Maraz Ali in "Adanali" in 2008. Played Fatih Sultan Mehmet in "Fatih" in 2013.
Will turkey become a european union member later this year?
Turkey is applying for membership but is not currently a member of the European Union. There are five main reasons given for the European Union's failure to accept the bid.
1) Turkish Failure to Recognize the Armenian Genocide:Many states in the European Union have recognized the Armenian Genocide as a fundamental denial of human rights against the Armenians. The Turkish Government currently espouses the view that while there may have been some indiscretions, it does not rise to the level of genocide. However, this view runs contrary to nearly all established scholarship outside of Turkey. Additionally, Turkey compels many world governments to not to accept the term "genocide" using its critical location and foreign policy as weapons against taking this view.
2) Turkish Invasion and Occupation of North Cyprus: In 1974, the Turkish army launched an amphibious assault in Cyprus to protect Turkish Cypriots from an increasingly pro-Greek Cypriot majority. In 1974, the UN established a ceasefire line which has divided Cyprus into northern and southern halfs. To this day there has been no formal peace treaty. Turkey has also moved 200,000 Turkish citizens to the north of Cyprus in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. (Considering that the population of Cyprus is only 1.1 million, this is a huge population transfer.) Being in a state of war against an EU member state, which Cyprus is, and occupying the de jure territory of another country are both violations of the terms of accession to the European Union
3) Turkish Repression of the Kurdish Minority: Kurds represent between 15-25% of the overall Turkish citizenry. They have a unique language, culture, and society from ethnic Turks. Many aspects of Kurdish culture are actively restricted. Their language was illegal for many decades as was the right to name their children with Kurdish names. Some Kurdish cities have been renamed in order to "Turk-ify" them. Some Kurds have risen in rebellion against the Turkish government, but far many more have attempted to have a peaceful discussion with the Turkish government. However, the Turkish government has assassinated numerous Kurdish politicians attempting to make peace and improve the situation. This maltreatment of a significant minority is appalling to European Union member states.
4) Turkey's Poor Human Rights Record: There are limits on the Freedoms of Speech and the Press in Turkey. The Justice System is relatively corrupt and the Prison System is badly maintained. Additionally, there are extra-national executions (where a person is sent to another country to be executed since capital punishment is illegal in Turkey) and relatively common applications of prisoner torture. There are military barracks near most Turkish cities in order to prevent protests and riots. Turkey is a liberal democracy in comparison to most Middle Eastern countries, but not in comparison to the much greater transparency and freedoms in most of the remaining European Union countries.
5) Turkey's Developing Economy: Turkey is a developing economy whereas most of the European Union has a developed economy. Since the European Union is first and foremost an economic union and then a superstate structure, having an economy that operates along different principles from most European economies makes accession more difficult.
There are two additional reasons cited by Turks and their sympathizers as to why their bid has not been accepted.
1) Economic Competition: Although Turkey is a developing country, it has a population larger than every current European Union member other than Germany. Turkey's economy is growing at a very high rate and Turkish infrastructure is completely evolving. Additionally, due to European Union internal migration laws, many Turks would likely migrate to other European countries without VISA issues. This would lead to competition for employment opportunities between citizens of other European Union countries and Turkish migrants. The fear of the growing Turkish economy and the migration of Turks to other countries makes many Europeans wary of Turkish accession.
2) Islam: There is currently no member in European Union which is a majority-Muslim country. Given Europe's frigid reception of Muslim immigrants, many Turks say that the primary reason that they have not been allowed to become a part of the European Union is that their religion and culture have been labelled as "different" and "non-European".
What empire did the Ottoman Turks conquer?
Ottoman Empire officially collapsed at the conclusion of WWI, when the Allied Forces defeated the Central Powers. Most of it's holdings were dispersed as colonies (mandates) to Britain, France, and other major victors of WWI.
So, technically the Ottoman Empire was conquered by the winning alliance of WWI also known as the Triple Entente, which at the end of WWI consisted of Britain, France, the USA, Japan.
What is the former name of Turkey?
The Republic Of Turkey was founded in 1923 when Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and his followers overthrew the corrupt rulers of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was the predecessor of modern day Turkey.
What are Turkey's ethnic groups?
The main ethnic groups in Turkey are Turks, Kurds, Arabs, and others such as Circassians, Bosniaks, and Albanians. Turks make up the majority of the population, while Kurds are the largest minority group. These ethnic groups have diverse cultures, languages, and histories.
D. The Ottoman Empire was the former name for what is now Turkey. The Ottoman dynasty lasted for 623 years until 1st November 1922, when the monarchy was abolished.
Islam.
It is important to note that the distinction between Shi'a Islam, Sunni Islam, and Ibadi Islam (and between the internal schools of each) happened relatively early on, so to say that that Islam is one religious group is like saying Christianity is one religious group when there are vast differences between Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Christians, and Mormons.
Which nationality of people founded the Ottoman Empire?
Turkish people are founders of the Ottoman Empire.
Some wars that Turkey has fought in are the Franco-Turkish War and the Turkish War of Independence. They also fought in the Korean War, World War 2, and the Iraqi/Kurdish Civil War.
Mehmet Akif Alakurt was born on July 23, 1979, in Istanbul, Turkey.
How did the ottomans rule their empire?
like any other government. they wopuld have followers who would follow out his commands and keep the people under order.
What has the author Mustafa Mehmet Konuray written?
Mustafa Mehmet Konuray has written:
'The interactions of hot spheres and volatile liquids'
Why did Russia want to seize the bosporus and darnalleles?
Because they would give Russia an out let via the Black Sea through the Sea of Marmara to the Mediterranean. Because they would give Russia an out let via the Black Sea through the Sea of Marmara to the Mediterranean.
What did Kemal Ataturk and Reza Shah Pahlavi have in common?
Kemal Ataturk in Turkey and Reza Shah Pahlavi were involved in modernizing, secularizing, and Westernizing their countries.
Weakening of the Clergy: Many of these political reforms were done to increase the secularization , as a result, the Muslim clergy, which had historically had a large role in governance of the Turkish and Iranian States had their political roles threatened. Education, which had previously been religious, was stripped of that element, which further weakened the clergy and the religion. Finally, both leaders jailed clerics they disagreed with and standardized weekly sermons in order to direct the religion in the country.
Westernization Values: Westernization imparts different social values than the ones that Islamic clerics considered valuable. For example, Westerners value a person more often by his productivity than by his character and humility. This resulted in vast infrastructural developments, industrial growth, and an opening to international commerce.
Nationalism over Pan-Islamism: Both Turkish and Iranian Reforms strengthened nationalist ideologies and supported the uniqueness of Turks and Iranians by discussing their particular histories and values. This resulted in the development of new historical narratives.
Was the Ottoman Empire tolerant of other religions living in the empire?
Answer 1
Yes it was , people lived in peace, just like it is now in Turkey.
Answer 2
Answer 1 is correct insofar as its notes that the nature of tolerance that exists in Turkey today is reminiscent of the Ottoman Empire's stances. While the Ottoman Empire was certainly more tolerant than contemporary civilizations in the Middle Ages and early Modern Period, there was certainly a religious hierarchy.
Christians and Jews in the Empire were each governed by a Millet, which was an administrative council devoted to that religion run by the leadership of that religion as appointed by the Sultan. The Armenians, for example, had one Millet, the Greek Orthodox, another, the Slavic Orthodox, a third, and so forth. These Millets would report to the Sultan on the dealings of their religious flock and prevent them from being problematic. Non-Muslims were also required to pay the jizya tax, which was a per-person tax for the privilege of being both non-Muslim and alive at the same time. In different periods, the Ottomans also instituted the kharaj which was a land-ownership tax that applied exclusively to non-Muslims. Given the large Christian populations in the Balkans, this measure was fazed out rather quickly to avoid unrest.
However, the most egregious crime that the Ottomans perpetrated throughout their reign was the practice of devşirme, whereby young intelligent Christian boys and girls would be forcibly taken by their families and deported to Istanbul. Once in Istanbul they would be converted to Islam and trained in the Sultan's private academies. The men would become the fearsome Janissary Warriors, the elite troops of the Ottoman Army and the women would become the Sultan's attendants in the Harem (and if lucky they might give the Sultan a son).
Finally, after the loyalty shown by the Armenians to the Ottomans throughout the 1800s (as opposed to the Greeks, Bulgars, Croats, and Serbs, who openly rose up against Ottoman rule), 1.8 million Armenians were slaughtered from 1917-1919 in what Turkey refuses to call a genocide to this day. (Turkey continues to bully other countries on this issue as well.)
Turkish Tolerance issues currently are not religious as Turkey has relieved itself of most of its religious minorities. However, ethnic tensions, such as with the Kurdish population in the East, Circassian population in the Northeast, and Arab population in the South are recipients of wonderful Turkish hospitality.
Who started the Turko-Cypriot Conflict?
In 1974 Cyprus was an island nation with a democratically elected government and with a population of citizens of both Greek and Turkish origin. In 1974 the Cypriot National Guard overthrew the democratically elected government of Cyprus. Turkey claimed that the Cypriot National Guard was controlled by a Greek junta and that the governmental overthrow amounted to an "invasion" of Cyprus by Greece. Turkey then 'retaliated' (in support of the overthrown government) by invading Cyprus by land and naval forces which, in turn, brought full scale retaliation from Greece, which did likewise. I suppose it depends on which side you support as to which scenario you subscribe to.
---------------------------------------
However if you look at the BBC reports and go to the National History Library, you would see that the greek cypriots joined Greece in 1953 to try and take over the country.
The English government sent troops the keep the peace but they were also killed by the greek army from Greece who also over threw the priminister of Cyprus in order to take control.
Turkey entered the country to save the Turkish cypriots from being killed and as of today the northen side is still not allowed to trade and fund themselves unless Turkey keeps supporting them.
1963 a document was signed recognising 2 separate states which now the English and greek government ignores.
What were some specialized jobs of the townspeople of catal hoyuk?
farming weavers basket makers toolmakers and traders
No,
The Turks are a people originally from Central Asia. It is widely believed that they originate from the Altay mountains in the west of Mongolia. The Original Turks may have also been a Mongolic people who mixed with a Caucasoid people of central Asia called the Tocharians to form the modern day Turkic peoples of Central Asia and Turkey. It is very possible the word Turk is derived from the word Tochar. Turkic people include (Turkish, Azerbaijanis, Uzbeks, Uyghurs, Tatars, Kazakhs, Turkmens and Kyrgyzis. All Turkic people today speak Altaic languages which are similiar to Mongolian.
The Arabs on the other hand are a caucasian race that originate from the middle east.
What did ottoman empire do in ww1?
Answer 1
The Ottoman Empire was manipulated into WWI by the Germans on the side of the Central Powers when the German navy sent one of its naval vessels into the Bosphorus.
While visiting Ephesus my tour guide said that Germany commandeered a naval vessel; fired on a Russian naval ship and was thus entered into the war.
Answer 2
The Ottomans grew economically weak, due to the economic boom of European Industrialization. Their workers lost their jobs due to cheaper products marketted by their European rivals. The Ottoman government, to save their state from this decline wanted educational, cultural and Militarial reforms which would cost so much that their treasury couldn't bare. So they borrowed, from the European Money lenders hence went severely under Debt.
As we can see the pattern repeating itself in a number of occasions during history, Debt can be used as a very powerful tool in political dealing and decision making, proved to be the case. Europeans were going to war amongst each other and wanted as much manpower at their side as possible. So they demanded their pound of flesh from the ottomans by joining the great war, with whichever side they take, promising to help them pay their Debt, if successful.
As the Allied forces sought the help of Russia, an arch enemy of the Ottomans, the Ottomans decided to side Germany.
This may come to a surprise to some, as how can the ottomans go against their European Money lenders, it is suggested that one reads the financing of the Banking elite of both sides of the conflicts of the Nepoleonic wars and their manipulation of the London Stock Exchange, buying up almost all of the shares of the English industries.
Their is another interesting link, regarding the financiers of the war and the possible resultant decision of the Ottomans. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was issued.
Which states
Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely
Arthur James Balfour
It wanted to increase its territory and help its allies.
What are the names of the two sections of the roman empire?
The Romans Empire was not split into separate sections. In 286 the emperor Diocletian created a co-emperorship and designated Milan (in Italy) as the imperial capital of the western part of the Roman Empire and Nicomedia (in northwestern Turkey) as the imperial capital of the Western part of the Roman Empire. Rome became the nominal capital of the whole empire. West and east were administrative subdivisions of a single empire which, Diocletian stressed, was indivisible. Other subdivisions were some two hundred provinces which were grouped into 12 dioceses.
IN 395 the eastern and western part of the Roman Empire became separated because of circumstances, not because of a decision to split it. It happened because the sons of Theodosius I, Arcadius (who was in charge of the eastern part) and Honorius (who was in charge of the western part) were young and inexperienced and politicians in the two parts of the empire took advantage of this to conspire against each other. Most importantly, the western part soon begun to crumble under the weight of the Germanic invasions and then fell. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for another 1,000 years.
Historians have coined the terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire. The Romans did not use these terms. The only had one term; Roman Empire. Historians have also coined the term Byzantine Empire to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part.
Who was the last Caliph of Ottoman Turkey?
The last of the 4 Rightly Guided Caliphs was Hazrat Imam Ali.
Biography of Hazrat Ali (Sunni perspective) -
http://baharemadinah.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=140:hazrat-ali-bin-abu-talib&catid=47:the-blessed-companions&Itemid=350
How much turkey do Americans eat per year?
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the typical American consumed 13.4 pounds (6.1 kilograms) of turkey in 2004. In that same year, the typical American ate 4.7 pounds (2.1 kilograms) of sweet potatoes.
How much is 100000 Turkish lira worth in UK pounds?
There are 1,000,000 old lira in 1 New Turkish lira, so your old lira have little money value, just curiosity value. (1 New Turkish lira is worth (March 2009) about US$0.75.)
Any remaining old lira has to be converted at either the Turkish Central Bank or T.C. Ziraat Bank branches, at the rate of 1 million old lira = 1 new lira