answersLogoWhite

0

History of Islam

The history of Islam goes back over 1400 years to Prophet Muhammad and his creation of the first Islamic State in Medina Munawarra. Since that point, Islamic culture, custom and tradition have spread all across the world in numerous empires and by peaceful conversions. Muslims have been prominent in science, government, religion, philosophy, literature and numerous other areas of human endeavor. If you are interested in learning more about the history of the Islamic World, its development over the centuries and its contributions to society, here is a good place to start asking your questions.

1,088 Questions

How did Islamic rule affect the Persians?

The Arab Islamic Invasion of Persia from the 600s C.E. until Persia became independent again in the 900s C.E. had a profound effect on Persia and Persian culture. Some of the myriad of changes that occurred domestically within Persia included:

Islam Replacing Zoroastrianism: Persia had previously had its own unique religion called "Zoroastrianism". Under the Parthians and Sassanids, Zoroastrianism had become the majority religion in Persia and was the religion of the rulers and aristocrats. Under Islamic Rule, Zoroastrians were persecuted, in some cases violently, but in most cases simply by repressive taxes and social sanction. In order to maintain their position in the nobility, most nobles were required to convert to Islam or face the "horrible" life of a commoner. Within three centuries, Persia had become majority-Muslim.

Arab-Persian Ethnic Conflict: For most of Persian history up to this point, the Persians had seen the Arabs as a distant nuisance on the Arabian Peninsula and scarcely paid them more heed than they would common thieves or vandals. Persia concerned itself with controlling civilized regions and settled peoples, like the Mesopotamians, the Levantines, the Anatolians, the Egyptians, and the Khorasanis. In almost all cases, when the Persians conquered these areas, they were well-respected as civilized, organized, and cultural rulers. Conversely, when the Arabs overran Persia, they destroyed Persian cultural buildings; had little regard for Persian organizational systems; understood nothing of Persian literature, history, or values; and, worst of all, asserted themselves as superior to the Persians. This set up a centuries-long rivalry between the Arabs and Persians where the former saw the latter as second-class Muslims (Mawali) since they refused to leave their old heathen language behind and embrace Arabic (in contrast to the Mesopotamians, Levantines, and Egyptians) and where the latter saw the former as uncivilized barbarians who had the audacity to trample all over 4000 years of culture and development. Neither side has really made overtures to heal the cultural rift and today, Saudi Arabia, the center of the Arab World, and Iran remain bitter enemies.

Arabic Influence in Persian: During the Arab Islamic Caliphates, the Persian language was substantially modified with numerous Arabic loanwords that led to a massive transformation of the language. Additionally, Arabic forms of poetry became popular in Persia. It would take the influence of the later giants of Persian literature like Ferdowsi, Khayyam, and Nizami to "re-Persianify" the Persian language. However, the Arabic literary stylings became integrated into a wider Persian ambit of literature and culture in the Persian tradition of taking the best from "lesser cultures".

Pax-Islamica and Persian Science: Because of the vast size of the Umayyad and Abbassid Empires, Persia benefited from an exchange of knowledge and goods with the Amazigh of North Africa and the Iberians of Spain, not to mention the Levantine populations who were physically close, but under Byzantine control previously. This allowed for a flowering of Persian science and mathematics during the wider Islamic Golden Age. In fact, many of the key figures of the Islamic Golden Age were Persians, like al-Khwarizmi, Rumi, Nasir ad-Din al-Tusi, and Ibn Sina.

Where did Christians and Muslims have the greatest interaction in the Christian West?

This depends entirely on how you define the "Christian West". If the Balkans count, I would argue that the greatest interaction happened there. If Spain counts, but not the Balkans, I would count Spain. While the interaction in Spain was technically longer, the interaction in the Balkans was much deeper and left many longer lasting effects than slavery and beautiful architecture.

Why did the Quraysh of Mecca reject Muhammad's message?

Arabs, like me, obey their fathers. And their fathers worshiped other gods beside the Almighty Allah. Also, they thought that Muhammad wanted to dethrone their gods. So they rejected Muhammad's message.

If someone came to you, and he said, the earth is not round.... it is square.

First of all this sounds not logic to you, second you are very convinced that the earth is round and you see it as a fact (even though you never saw it , and because the "higher" people say so, you think so, and because school teaches you so, and you thinnk you have proof). this person says to you: " no it is square" and he is winning people. Would you not stand up and say that he is lying and trying to prove he is wrong??? Would you not see him as a fool????

well this is a micro-example, what Quraish did is a macro-example (they did everything to stop him, but nothing helped, Islam is still here.).

Why do the taliban execute people?

The Taliban believe that there are a number of "crimes" that merit the death penalty, and so they enforce it. Unfortunately, many of these "crimes" are things that are not considered crimes in other countries, such as blasphemy, homosexuality, apostasy, or female education.

Who won Richard the lionheart or saladin in the third crusade?

Richard the Lionhearted didn't win. Saladin won. He did make a treaty with the Christians though. They could make the pilgrimage to Jerusalem and enter the city unarmed.

How long did the Muslim Golden Age in the last?

Arguments exist concerning the length of the Muslim Golden Age. The Muslim movement was not monolithic. However, when the Golden Age ended in one place, it did not start up again in that location. When the Taliban and Al Qaeda gained control of Afghanistan, a new Golden Age of learning did not arise.

The Muslim Golden Age began about 850ad. It ended in Spain in 1175 ad, when the reactionaries imprisoned Averroes and burned his books. His students wanted him to go with them to Europe but he refused.

It was destroyed in Persia and Iraq by the Mongol invaders in the early 1200s.

By about 1450 it had been crushed all over except for pockets that kept the old learning alive.

Will the taliban retaliate now bin lardin is dead?

It is likely that Al-Kaida would want to retaliate since the US killed Bin Laden.

Why did Muslims conquer Persia Syria Damascus Jerusalem and Egypt?

They could and they perceived that doing this was their duty as pious Muslims.

Historically, there was the "Right to Conquest" which was a pervasive idea in political thought. The idea was that it was natural for any country or state to grow and control more territory as it grew stronger. This allowed weaker states to dissolve in place of ones that were better run, a bureaucratic version of "survival of the fittest". The "Right to Conquest" prevailed as the dominant theory of nation-building until the mid-1800s when people started bringing up the concept of self-sovereignty and ethnic nationalism, which held the idea that people should govern themselves even if they are not the most powerful in the world. This view of state sovereignty has become dominant today and the Right to Conquest is seen as incorrect.

Since the Caliphates existed well within the Right to Conquest Period, the Caliphs did not have to assert a reason to conquer neighboring territories in Southwest Asia. It was their natural prerogative.

Why is the battle of tours important for the history of Europe?

The Battle of Tours effectively stopped the Islamic advance in Western Europe and allowed Catholicism (and Christianity in general) to survive as the dominant form of European religion and a potent opposition to Islam in the subsequent centuries.

What are political differences between Sunnis and Shiites?

the political Method of the Selection of the Caliph by vote and its disagreement with the shiite view

shiism believes that the divine law of Islam or Shariah , whose substance is found in the book of God and in the tradition or Sunnah of the Holy Prophet , will remain valid to the day of judgment and can never, or nor will ever , be altered. A govenment which really is Islamic cannot, under any pretext , refuse completely to carry out the shariah's injunction. the only duty of an Islamic government is to make decisions by consultation within the limits set by Shariah and in accordance with the demands of the moment.

the vow of allegiance to Abu-BAkr at Saqifah, was motivated at least in part by political considerations and the incident described in the hadith of "INK and Paper" which occurred during the last days of the illness of the Holy prophet reveal the fact that those who directed and backed the movement to choose the caliph through the process of election believed that the book of God should be preserved in the form of constitution . they emphasized the Holy book and paid much less attention to the words of the Holy prophet as an immutable source of the teaching of islam. they seems to have accepted the modification of the certain Aspects of islamic Teachings concerning government to suit the conditions of the moment and for the sake of the general welfare.

What is the plural of taliban?

"Taliban" is plural.

The singular form of the noun is "Talib."

The word Taliban is a proper noun, the name of a specific group of people. A proper noun is always capitalized. The group of people known as Taliban is a fundamentalist Muslim movement whose militia took control of much of Afghanistan in 1995. The noun Taliban in English refers to this group, of which there is only one Taliban.

What is the history of the Islamic banking system in the Nigerian economy?

Islamic banking has the same purpose as conventional banking except that it operates in accordance with the rules of Sharia, known as Fiqh al-Muamalat (Islamic rules on transactions). The basic principle of Islamic banking is the sharing of profit and loss and the prohibition of riba´ (interest). Amongst the common Islamic concepts used in Islamic banking are profit sharing (Mudharabah), safekeeping (Wadiah), joint venture (Musharakah), cost plus (Murabahah), and leasing (Ijarah).

In an Islamic mortgage transaction, instead of loaning the buyer money to purchase the item, a bank might buy the item itself from the seller, and re-sell it to the buyer at a profit, while allowing the buyer to pay the bank in installments. However, the fact that it is profit cannot be made explicit and therefore there are no additional penalties for late payment. In order to protect itself against default, the bank asks for strict collateral. The goods or land is registered to the name of the buyer from the start of the transaction. This arrangement is called Murabaha.

Another approach is Ijara wa Iqtina, which is similar to real-estate leasing. Islamic banks handle loans for vehicles in a similar way (selling the vehicle at a higher-than-market price to the debtor and then retaining ownership of the vehicle until the loan is paid). There are several other approaches used in business deals. Islamic banks lend their money to companies by issuing floating rate interest loans. The floating rate of interest is pegged to the company's individual rate of return. Thus the bank's profit on the loan is equal to a certain percentage of the company's profits. Once the principal amount of the loan is repaid, the profit-sharing arrangement is concluded. This practice is called Musharaka. Further, Mudaraba is venture capital funding of an entrepreneur who provides labor while financing is provided by the bank so that both profit and risk are shared. Such participatory arrangements between capital and labor reflect the Islamic view that the borrower must not bear all the risk/cost of a failure, resulting in a balanced distribution of income and not allowing lender to monopolize the economy. And finally, Islamic banking is restricted to islamically acceptable deals, which exclude those involving alcohol, pork, gambling, etc. Thus ethical investing is the only acceptable form of investment, and moral purchasing is encouraged. JAIZ International is trying to see that it has establish an Islamic bank in this country, however with the review of Capital adequacy in Nigerian banks, the Islamic bank is delayed. Although the N25B Capital base is one condition for the establishment of an Islamic bank in Nigeria, but we see that there is more to meeting this CBN condition. The most important required conditions are: Managerial commitment, sharia supervisory board, safeguarding Muslim investor's fund and compliance with AAOIFI standards. Managerial commitment: The management must be fully convinced of the concept and fully committed and dedicated to it. Unless the entire management is committed and convinced, the business activities and the enterprise will not be foul free or will not escape irregularities and deviation. Regardless of how strict and stringent fatwa and contracts are, this will not ensure sound practices if there is no one sufficiently SINCERE and committed to implement the principles.

• Sharia Supervisory Board: There should be a sharia supervisory board for any Islamic bank, and that board should consist of trustworthy scholars who are highly qualified to issue fatawa on financial transactions.

Giving our present situation within the MUSLIMS today how do we constitute the members of the board? Another issue is TRUST from the customers who may use the banks fund, when it comes to profit sharing. Last but not the least is ENLIGHTEMENT, many people even within the Muslim are not aware of how Islamic banks operate. Therefore there is urgent need for a serious enlightenment to the public on operational modalities and requirement of an Islamic bank. Other options that may be considered by JAIZ or even states like SOKOTO, KANO BORNO, KATSINA etc is to establish an ISLAMIC MICRO FINANCE at local government level. The recently approved MICRO FINANCE BANKS can be converted to an Islamic one. In a symposium held at Harvard University on FINANCING THE POOR: Towards Islamic Microfinance some time last year, Nazim Ali has pointed out that Microfinance is not reaching the poorest of the poor, even though this is its purpose, and loans are going to activities unrelated to entrepreneurship. Islamic finance could, in principle and in practice, correct these defects. Robert Annibale, global director of microfinance for Citigroup, shared his insights into both Islamic finance and microfinance. He described microfinance institutions as self-styled "bankers of the poor `, originally rooted in domestic, local markets but increasing expanding into larger markets and offering a broader range of services. He noted that the high operating costs, passed on to the customer in the form of high interest rates, are a hurdle for the poor. He felt that this was where there is potential for Islamic finance to make a difference. Under conventional microfinance, risk is borne by borrowers and rarely held by the institutions. Islamic finance focuses on interest-free methods of providing capital, because the shari'ah holds lending to be a purely charitable exercise, rather than a means of making a profit, Islamic finance is also accustomed to methods of risk-reward sharing between the institution and the borrower. Islamic microfinance banks have grown significantly in countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Bangladesh. In fact, Islamic microfinance institutions enjoy greater penetration than traditional commercial banks in Bangladesh. It is high time for us here in Nigeria (particularly in the north because the south have started) to start introducing Islamic microfinance banks which will graduate to a full BANK in future.

Requirements for Islamic Banking in Nigeria

According to a draft framework released by the Central Bank in March,

Ø Islamic banks, referred to as non-interest banks shall be licensed in accordance with the requirements for a new banking license issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria from time to time.

Ø Conventional banks operating in Nigeria may offer sharia-compliant products and services through their non-interest banking branches or windows. However, such branches or windows cannot offer conventional banking or interest based products and services.

Ø Banks offering non-interest banking products and services shall not include the words "Islamic" as part of their registered or licensed name. This, the draft described as being in line with the provisions of Section 39 (1) of Banks and other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 1991 (as amended). They shall how-ever, be recognized by a uniform logo to be designed and approved by the CBN. The CBN shall require all the banks' signages and promotional materials to carry the logo to facilitate recognition by consumers.

Ø The Central Bank shall set up an advisory committee on non-interest bank-ing within the CBN to be called the CBN Shariah Council (CSC), which will be outsourced. The Council shall advise the CBN on Islamic laws and principles for the purposes of regulating non-interest banking business.

Ø All non-interest banks are required to maintain a minimum Risk Weighted Asset Ratio of 10.0% or as may be determined by the CBN from time to time for the purpose of calculating its Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR).

Ø All applications must be submitted with the required documents including a Non-refundable application fee of N500, 000.00 and deposit of minimum capital of N25 billion with the Central Bank of Nigeria.

Ø Not later than six (6) months after the grant of an Approval In Principle (A.I.P), the promoters of a proposed bank must submit application for the grant of a final banking license to the Director of Banking Supervision with a Non-refundable licensing fee of N5 million in bank draft payable to the CBN and other required documents

What was the name of mother of Firon?

Only his wet-nurse knows for sure. Yes, seriously.

Where did umar ibn khattab move the capital of the Islamic empire?

He didn't. The capital of the Islamic Empire remained in Medinah until the caliphate of 'Ali Ibn Abi Talib.

What effect did the spread of Islam have on the slave trade?

Answer 1

Slave trade diminished gradually because of Islam laws and rules. For example:

  • Muslims are encouraged to free slaves to be rewarded by God and to be forgiven from sins.
  • If a Muslim get a child from a slave woman the child is set free and his mother.

Answer 2

Slavery was a huge and shameful part of Islamic History. This is not to diminish the Ancient Slavemaking practices nor does it diminish the tragedy of the European Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, but as those are not contingent on the Spread of Islam, they are not discussed in full.

There was never an endemic Islamic Abolitionist Movement prior to Western Abolitionism in the 19th century. In fact, Saudi Arabia had legalized slavery until the 1960s and illegal slaves exist in Sudan, Mali, Mauritania, and Saudi Arabia among others. While the Qur'an notes that freeing a slave is an honorable thing to do, there is no compulsion to actually do it. In the 640s Caliph Omar issued one of the few Anti-Slavery edicts in Islamic history. It freed all Arab slaves and forbade the taking of new Arab slaves. This resulted in a fundamental change in the history of slavery. Prior to this, slaves were either former prisoners of war or civilians inside the state who were not the dominant ethnicity. Muslims now went abroad, hundreds of miles from the countries under their control to find non-Arabs that could be brought back to the Islamic Empires as slaves in order to skirt Omar's edict. This was what led to three types of slavery that coincided with the rise of the Islamic Caliphates: Slavic Slave Trade, Mamluks, and the Trans-Saharan African Slaves.

There was a very profitable trade with the Byzantine Empire and the Slavic Fiefdoms in the Balkans and the Ukraine that brought Slavs to the Islamic Caliphates. This is actually the genesis of the modern world "Slave", as a derivative of "Slav" which were moved and resold in the Islamic World. Slaves would be purchased in slave-markets in Europe and trekked to the Middle East for resale.

Mamluks were Kipchak Türks and Circassians from what is now Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. They were captured by Arab soldiers, enslaved, and brought to Baghdad in Iraq. They were converted to Islam and then formed into military units as a literal slave army in the service of the Abbassid Caliph. The Mamluks eventually turned their weapons against the Abbassid establishment and declared their own empires several times from the 11th century onwards.

The Trans-Sahran Slave trade in Islamic Empires was incredibly developed. Islamic States pioneered many of the quintessential parts of what would define the European Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade in the 16th-19th centuries. This included long-distance travel between the slave acquisition and the market, the use of large competitive marketplaces in urban centers to auction slaves, the development of legal doctrines about what rights owners had to transfer slaves to other owners, and, contrary to Islamic teachings and modern science, that Blacks had a more beastial nature, making them better-suited to the rigors of hard work and enslavement. It should not be surprising that the Spanish and Portuguese (who had lived under Islamic States for centuries) were the first European States to re-create a complex enslavement system. Unlike the Europeans, though, Arab Muslims saw fit to castrate all of their male African slaves so that they could not form a large Black population in the Arab countries. African female slaves were often sexually abused by their masters.

Islamic Apologists often make that claim that Muslims throughout history opposed slavery, but there was no Caliph (other than Omar) who made a fatwas opposing slavery, the slave trade, or the expansion of slavery within Islamic Empires prior to the 19th centuries. Islam is just as guilty as Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism in supporting slavery and giving it legal sanction historically. The difference is that while Christian support for slavery in history is well known, as is Christian-based Abolitionism, the history of slavery and the expansion of the slave trade among other religious groups is not often discussed.

Answer 3 (Hints on Answer 2)

  • Slavery was a huge and shameful part not only of Islamic History but also of the Christian and European history. Christian views on slavery are varied both regionally and historically. In the early years of Christianity, slavery was a normal feature of the economy and society in the Roman Empire, and well into the Middle Ages and beyond. Most Christian figures in that early period, such as Saint Augustine, supported continuing slavery. However, although Islam religion per Quran revelation to prophet Muhammad started by the seventh century and that slavery was not created during that time but was present long time before prophet Muhammad calling for Islam, Islam was the first God religion that tried by all means to limit the salvation trade as mentioned in Answer 1 while in other countries it continued beyond the 16th century (as in the US).
  • Historically, slavery was not just an Old Testament phenomenon. Slavery was practiced in every ancient culture: Egyptians, Babylonians, Roman and Israelite. Slavery was an integral part of ancient commerce, taxation, and temple religion.
  • Chattel slavery had been legal and widespread throughout North Africa when the region was controlled by the Roman Empire (47 BC - ca. 500 AD). The Sahel region south of the Sahara provided many of the African slaves held in North Africa during this period and there was a trans-Saharan slave trade in operation.
  • Chattel slavery persisted after the fall of the Roman empire in the largely Christian communities of the region. After the Islamic expansion into most of the region, the practices continued and eventually, the chattel form of slavery spread to major societies on the southern end of the Sahara (such as Mali, Songhai, and Ghana).
  • The medieval slave trade in Europe was mainly to the East and South: the Byzantine Empire and the Muslim World were the destinations, Central and Eastern Europe an important source of slaves. Slavery in medieval Europe was so widespread that the Roman Catholic Church repeatedly prohibited the export of Christian slaves to non-Christian lands, for example, the Council of Koblenz in 922, the Council of London in 1102, and the Council of Armagh in 1171.
  • Because of religious constraints, the slave trade was monopolised in parts of Europe by Iberian Jews (known as Radhanites)
  • The Mamluks were slave soldiers who converted to Islam and served the Muslim caliphs and the Ayyubid sultans during the Middle Ages. The first mamluks served the Abbasid caliphs in 9th century Baghdad. Over time they became a powerful military caste, and on more than one occasion they seized power for themselves, for example, ruling Egypt from 1250-1517.
  • Karl Marx in his economic history of capitalism, Das Kapital, claimed that '...the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins [that is, the slave trade], signalled the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production.' He argued that the slave trade was part of what he termed the 'primitive accumulation' of European capital, the 'non-capitalist' accumulation of wealth that preceded and created the financial conditions for Britain's industrialisation.
  • Eric Williams has written about the contribution of Africans on the basis of profits from the slave trade and slavery, arguing that the employment of those profits were used to help finance Britain's industrialisation. He argues that the enslavement of Africans was an essential element to the Industrial Revolution, and that European wealth was, in part, a result of slavery.
  • A similar debate has taken place about other European nations. The French slave trade, it is argued, was more profitable than alternative domestic investments, and probably encouraged capital accumulation before the Industrial Revolution and Napoleonic Wars.
  • Slavery in the United States of America existed in the 18th and 19th centuries. Slavery had been practiced in British North America from early colonial days, and was firmly established by the time of the United States' Declaration of Independence (1776). Twelve million slaves brought from Africa to the Americas. The great majority of African slaves were transported to sugar colonies in the Caribbean and to Brazil. As life expectancy was short, their numbers had to be continually replenished. Since persons with African origins were not English subjects by birth, they were considered foreigners and generally outside English Common Law. The treatment of slaves in the United States varied widely depending on conditions, times and places. Treatment was generally characterized by brutality, degradation, and inhumanity. Whippings, executions, and rapes were commonplace. To help regulate the relationship between slave and owner, including legal support for keeping the slave as property, slave codes were established. Slave codes were laws established to demonstrate legal sanctions over the black population. Slavery is regarded by economists and historians as a profitable system.

Accordingly, it is incorrect to say that "Slavery was a huge and shameful part of Islamic History". It is the opposite. Islam religion; by God revelation of Qur'an to prophet Muhammad; tried to limit it as explained in Answer 1.

How did the Muslim rulers give their merchants an advantage?

Their caravans traveled overland from Baghdad to China. Their ship crossed the Indian ocean to India and southeast Asia.