What were problems after the end of imperialism in Africa?
During imperialism, Europeans had been draining Africa's resourses, both natural and human. After they stopped, Africa was left with few resources, fewer native Africans, invasive European settlements that they battled with for land and resources, borders drawn arbitrarily by European imperialists within which they had to try to form fully functioning, developed countries, and some more small imperialism and slave trading.
Which Spanish colony gained its independence?
Every Spanish colony has gained its independence from Spain from Mexico to Argentina to Equatorial Guinea to the Philippines. All of Spain's Non-Iberian territories have Spanish majorities and do not seek independence.
Monroe Doctrine 1823
What reasons allowed Great Britain to further its colonization in the new world?
A vigorous economy supplemented by a wide-flung system of trade & commerce, an industrious citizenry, an efficient professional military establishment enhanced by the most powerful & state-of-the-art navy afloat, and control of the global financial system as the successors of the Dutch burghers all contributed to the advantages enjoyed by the British, especially after the formation of Great Britain during the reign of Queen Anne
How did Industrial Revolution cause imperialism?
The Industrial Revolution provided both the mechanical engine of progress and the emotional engine of progress. These two things, the capacity to expand and the will to expand, fed directly into imperialism.
On a more direct, grounded level, the Industrial Revolution gave Europeans the ability to mass produce weapons and technologies. This gave rise to a need to export these manufactures and under the Mercantile Economic System (which was in its final days) export regions were taken as colonies to be administrated by the producing power. The weapons that were mass produced made fighting wars much easier.
The technologies and products that came out of the factories raised the standard of living of Europeans which lead to an increased value in how they saw their civilization. Europeans believed that their culture was behind their consistent technological progress and moved to annex regions to "improve" their culture. This mentality was encapsulated by the "White Man's Burden" by Rudyard Kipling. The Expansion of Empire itself was also symbolic of European dominance and cultural superiority as they reasoned that only powerful empires can expand over new territories.
How long did the US colonize the Philippines?
Depending on how you look at the history, the US took control of the Philippines in 1898 with the defeat of the Spanish, in 1899 with the signing of the peace treaty between the US and Spain, or in 1902 with the end of the Philippine Insurrection (Philippine-American War).
What were examples of the development of self government and democracy in the British colonies?
Some examples are Massachusetts and Rhode Island
What was the main reason European countries colonized Africa in the 19th century?
Primarily it was to obtain the raw materials that existed there. At the time, much of Africa was an unexplored land with untapped resources.
Since Africa was technologically inferior to Europe at the time, and the populations there mainly primitive, establishing colonies was not prohibitively difficult. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 essentially "divided up" Africa into various European colonies and spheres of influence, many of which lasted until the middle of the 20th century.
Which European nation colonized and ruled in India all the way up to 1947?
United Kingdom controlled Indian till after WW 2. It controlled India using East India Company. They came as traders but eventually became rulers.
Why did Spain seek to discover and colonize new lands?
Spain wanted land in Colombia because the land was rich in gold.
What Arab countries were colonized by Spain?
Portions of Morocco (under the name "Spanish Protectorate of Morocco) were colonized by Spain, as was Western Sahara/Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (under the name "Spanish Sahara"), which is currently claimed and occupied by Morocco, but recognized as an independent country by 85 other states, with 40 of these having active diplomatic relations.
Spain still controls the cities of Ceuta and Mellila on the northern coast of Morocco, and the cities are generally considered part of Spain, although Morocco claims the territory.
How is imperialism relevant to American history?
Firstly, the US is made up of the colonies of imperialistic countries (countries who wanted to expand their empires into new places). England colonized the east coast, France the southeast Gulf Coast, Spain the Southwest; Russia colonized Alaska; southeastern Asian nations colonized Hawaii. Every part of the US was once the territory of some other imperialistic nation.
The US itself was imperialistic as it collected these remnants of other nations' failed attempts at imperialism. It expanded its power from those original thirteen colonies to the Louisiana Purchase from France, then the SW from Mexico after a war, bought Alaska from Russia. Much less honorable were the snatchings of Hawai'i (some rogue farmers overthrew the queen and declared Hawai'i a territory of the US), Puerto Rico, Guam, and others who wished to be independent of US control. Stubbornly and imperialistically, the US held on.
Was the Mexican War an exercise in American imperialism?
Yes the Mexican was was an exercise in American Imperialism. The US government believed firmly in the doctrine of Manifest destiny, the government argued that they had the right and duty to expand through North American because it was necessary and inevitable. During the 19th century Mexico dominated a large amount of North America which was inhabited by American settlers and the American government aimed to expand the USA from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean and were ready to achieve this by any means. The American government saw the lands of Texas and California as grand prizes with the opportunity of lush agricultural prospect and the possibility of a gateway to the Pacific Ocean. The lands though belonged to the nation of Mexico, which seen by the Americans was a backward nation and did not deserve to have the lands. President James Polk intended to use full extent of his power to expand America and he devoted his time during his reign as President in negotiations with Mexico over the lands of California.
How did the British benefit from imperialism in India?
India attained Independence on August 15th 1947, after a great political and social struggle. The British had ruled over India for a considerable period of time. Their initial intentions were to carry out trade in India, but in due course of time they developed political and administrative ambitions.
The Evolution of the Indian Independence Movement
The British East India Company had gained much control over the internal affairs of India. The spirit of nationalism in India gained ground in the middle of the 19th century. It was strengthened by the formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885. The authoritative and indifferent attitude of the British towards the Indian sentiments led to the national movement gaining momentum. National leaders, like Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhai Patel and many others fought for political and administrative rights of the people. The British were ruthless in their dealings with those who fought for the rights of the Indians. The divide and rule policy of the British led to the division between the Hindus and the Muslims and the formation of the Muslim League.
Extremists views among the Indian National Congress Members
During the early 20th century, the spirit of nationalism received an impetus by growing extreme views among some of the Indian National Congress members. They did not favor the moderate stance taken by some of national leaders, and criticized the British for their overbearing and autocratic attitude towards the Indians.
The Role of Mahatma Gandhi
By 1920s the national movement had become very aggressive. Mahatma Gandhi began several movements against the British. The Non-cooperation Movement (1920-1922 A.D.). This was followed by the Civil Disobedience Movement. The movement for independence continued through the 1930s, but it gained much ground during the Second World War. The Indian National Congress cooperated with the British in war efforts. It was hoped that the British would leave India after the Second World War. But the British did not relent. Then Mahatma Gandhi began the "Quit India Movement" in 1942. The British eventually realized that they had to leave India for good.
The Rise of the Muslim League
The Muslim League sought a separate nation for them, Pakistan. The League was concerned that independent India would have Hindus at the helm of affairs. Although, it was planned that power would be divided between the Hindus and Muslims as proposed by the Cabinet Mission proposal. Yet, senior leader of the Muslim League Mohammad Ali Jinnah did not agree to it. The League favored direct action, which led to Hindu-Muslim riots. In March 1947, Lord Mountbatten had come to India and favored partition of Punjab and Bengal despite the civil war. Gandhi did not favor partition and suggested that Jinnah should become the leader of the united India. But many nationalist leaders did not favor this. Eventually, the British Parliament passed the Indian Independence Act, which led to the formation of India and Pakistan.
India is a now a sovereign republic and is a force to reckon with in world politics. It is the largest democracy in the world. It has retained its secular identity despite communal flare-ups.
How do you distinguish between bacterial colonies and yeast colonies?
Under a microscope a yesat should have long filamentous hyphae whereas bacteria are simple rods or cocci. Acidic or antibacterial mediums should kill most bacteria most fungi (including yeasts) will remain living.
3 factors that fueled american imperialism?
Well there is a problem with that question in that the US has never retained any country they have done war with post-finalization which means they have never practiced imperialism.
I'm assuming what you meant to ask is "What are three factors that fueled U.S. expansionism?"
1. Debt to Holland, France, Denmark and Norway to fund the American Revolutionary War.
2. US business law deeming all international affairs not with in US jurisdiction over US companies.
3. Europe ceding legal rights to American companies do to a very one sided (US favored) terms for the acceptance of European banks to establish a central bank in the US that allowed for legal presence of American companies in any country that established central banking through US founded World Bank or IMF.
Mostly the third one though. The Rothschilds got rich selling the world to the US and China. China as they hold the Treaty of Wangxia which promises China rights in the US equal to any other nation and vice-versa.
Nationalism fueled competition among European nations, as countries sought to assert their dominance and expand their influence. Imperialism intensified rivalries, with nations vying for colonies and resources, leading to conflicts over territorial claims. These tensions culminated in alliances, as countries formed the Allied Powers, primarily motivated by mutual defense against perceived threats from rival nations, while the Central Powers emerged from nations that sought to support one another's imperial ambitions and national interests. This complex interplay of nationalism and imperialism ultimately contributed to the outbreak of World War I.
Were Zambia and Malawi colonies of France?
Yes, Zambia was at one time a colony of a European power. During the Berlin Conference, the Europeans divided up Africa and its people for their own benefit. They were trying to obtain the resources there, and so they gave the people no say.
Why did the Anti-Imperialists League oppose interventionsm?
They opposed intervention for moral and practical reasons.
What color is usually used to represent the British empire on maps during the age of imperialism?
RED!
Was Albert J Beveridge an Anti-Imperialist?
NO. Beveridge was known as a strong Imperialist and actively supported American expansion and Imperialism. His arguments were very similar to Rudyard Kipling's "White Man's Burden" and Social Darwinism in terms of why he justified the expansion of American power.
Why was Cabot's voyage to the New World discouraging to those thinking about colonizing America?
Because Cabot was exploring for England, and the other countries could not encroach upon the territory he claimed unless they wanted to start a war with England.