Similarities Between

Windows, Mac OS and Linux are all operating systems. All three can be used in computer desktops, laptops, netbooks, notebooks, smartphones, tablets, etc. You can use any of the three to surf the web, check your email, video chat, as word processors, video editors, for music listening, recording and production, graphics design, and the list goes on and on. However, the software that you use to accomplish the tasks I mentioned might be different depending on which operating system you're using. For example, to go on the internet you a need a web browser: Windows PCs come standard with Internet Explorer, Mac PCs come with Safari, and Linux usually comes with Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, or an offshoot of the two (Iceweasel, Chromium, etc).

They both relay information

Modern maps and ancient maps, though different in how they're made, both represent an area through lines, symbols, and words.

One thing that is similar about Montresor and Fortunato in The Cask of Amontillado is that they both are single minded about their pursuit of something. Montresor is in pursuit of killing Fortunato and Fortunato is in pursuit of the amontillado.

Durkheim and Marx are both theorists in the field of sociology. Their theories have very few similarities, except when they talk about the role that work plays in society. Durkheim describes every society as having a division of labor, meaning that not every person would be able to benefit directly from the making of a product or giving of a service. Marx would agree with this in his idea of workers being isolated from other workers and from the objects or services they provided.

Both "The Cask of Amontillado" and "The Yellow Wallpaper" explore themes of confinement and madness. In both stories, the protagonists experience psychological descent into darkness due to their circumstances. The settings play a significant role in shaping the characters' mental states, with the confined spaces becoming symbolic of their deteriorating mental health.

water polo started as a version of rugby football that was played in British lakes and rivers in the late 19th century with a ball made of Indian rubber. The name comes from the Balti word 'pulu' meaning ball.

It was a demonstration of strength and swimming skill and was often a feature of county fairs and festivals.

They are both mammals.

Differences are technological in nature. The troops involved were equally heroic, the differences were national commitment, and the similarities again are that people died, children died, Families died, and military personnel died in pursuit of their nation's objectives. Differences are that

deaths in Iraq continue and US deaths are rare in Vietnam.

Other than the fact that it creates an image of your body for medical purposes...absolutely nothing.

Xray uses ionizing radiation (the potentially harmful kind) which passes through your body. Some of it comes out the other side and reacts with a detector that is behind your body. This creates an image by reflecting how much of the radiation passes through. This is dependent upon what type of tissue it is passing through. Bone, for example, will not allow as much to pass through as soft tissue such as fat or muscle.

MRI is very different and quite complicated. It creates images by measuring the way hydrogen molecules in your body react to a magnet. One of the magnets is switched on and off rapidly and the reactions of the hydrogen molecules will depend upon what type of tissue is there. Hydrogen molecules in fat, for example, are attracted to the magnet very quickly, while hydrogen in water will move more slowly. This is the concept used to get images. It does not use the harmful type of radiation like Xray.

An infections disease is a sickness you can catch (or give to) other people. The flu and chicken pox are examples of infections diseases. Lifestyle diseases are sicknesses you cannot get or give to other people. You get lifestyle diseases from unhealthy lifestyle (little exercise, too much unhealthy food, etc.). Examples of lifestyle diseases are type two diabetes and gout.

Physical disabilities affects someone physically often you can see when someone has a physical disabilities. A learning disabilities can't be seen just by looking at the person, it comes out in how they learn, read, write and so on.

Answer

* Part of digestive system * intestines * absorb (small=nutrients large=water)

Your children are likely to encounter narcissists in the future. In a way, they will be better prepared to cope with them, more alert to their existence and chicanery and more desensitized to their abuse.

For this you should be grateful.

There is nothing much you can do, otherwise. Stop wasting your money, time, energy and emotional resources on this intractable "problem" of how to insulate your children from their father's influence. It is a lost war, though a just cause. Instead, make yourself available to your children.

The only thing you can do to prevent your children from emulating their father - is to present to them another role model of a NON-narcissist - YOU. Hopefully, when they grow up, they will prefer your model to their father's. But there is only that much you can do. You cannot control the developmental path of your children. Exerting unlimited control over your children is what narcissism is all about - and is exactly what you should avoid at all costs, however worried you might be.

Narcissism does tend to breed Narcissism - but not inevitably. Not all the off-spring of a narcissist inexorably become narcissists.

The Narcissistic parent regards his or her child as a multi-faceted source of Narcissistic supply. The child is considered and treated as an extension of the Narcissist's personality. It is through the child that the Narcissist seeks to settle "open accounts" with the world. The child is supposed to materialize the unfulfilled Narcissistic dreams and fantasies of the Narcissistic parent. This "Life by Proxy" can develop in two possible ways: the Narcissist can either merge with his child or be ambivalent towards him. The ambivalence is the result of a conflict between the attainment of Narcissistic goals and pathological (destructive) envy.

To ameliorate the unease bred by emotional ambivalence, the Narcissist resorts to a myriad of control mechanisms. The latter can be grouped into: guilt-driven ("I sacrificed my life for you�"), dependence-driven ("I need you, I cannot cope without you�"), goal-driven ("We have a common goal which we must achieve") and explicit ("If you do not adhere to my principles, beliefs, ideology, religion or any other set of values � sanctions will be imposed").

The exercise of control helps to sustain the illusion that the child is a part of the Narcissist. Such sustenance calls for extraordinary levels of control (on the part of the parent) and obedience (on the part of the child). The relationship is typically symbiotic and emotionally vicissitudinal and turbulent.

The child fulfils another important Narcissistic function � that of Narcissistic supply. There is no denying the implied (though imaginary) immortality in having a child. The early (natural) dependence of the child serves to assuage the fear of abandonment, which is THE driving force in the Narcissist's life. The Narcissist tries to perpetuate this dependence, using the aforementioned control mechanisms. The child is the penultimate Secondary Narcissistic Source of Supply. He is present, he admires, he accumulates and remembers, owing to his wish to be loved he can be extorted into forever giving. For the Narcissist, a child is a dream come true, but only in the most egotistical sense. When the child is perceived as "reneging" on his chief duty (to provide his Narcissistic parent with constant supply of adoration) � the emotional reaction is harsh and revealing.

It is when the Narcissistic parent is disenchanted with his child that we see the true nature of this pathological relationship. The child is totally objectified. The Narcissist reacts to a breach in the unwritten contract with wells of aggression and aggressive transformations: contempt, rage, emotional and psychological abuse, and even physical violence. He tries to annihilate the real child (brought to the Narcissist's awareness through the child's refusal to act as before) and substitute it with the subservient, edifying, former version.

The Narcissistic parent tends to produce another Narcissist in his child. But this outcome can be effectively countered by loving, empathic, predictable, just, and positive upbringing which encourages a sense of autonomy and responsibility. Provide your child with an alternative to his father's venomous and exploitative existence. Trust your children to choose life over death, love over narcissism, human relations over narcissistic supply.

YOU DON'T LET THEM SEE THE ABUSER OR HAVE ANY CONTACT AT ALL IF POSSIBLE BECAUSE IF THE ABUSER DID THIS TO YOU, SOMEONE HE PROCLAIMED TO LOVE, HE IS MOST DEFINITELY CAPABLE OF THE SAME TREATMENT WITH YOUR CHILDREN

It would be sensible to totally restrict, or limit, your children's relationship with their father. Even if they themselves were not physically abused by their father, they witnessed his abuse of you, their mother, and this can be distressing for a child.

Your children need a loving relationship from their parents. You are providing that. Your former husband, however, is not. He also is using his children as targets now that he does not have you to abuse. Try to obtain some counseling for your children. Don't try to "protect" your children from the facts of their father's abuse. If your children complain or seem scared of their father, seek legal means to prevent him from seeing his children.

I'm a 27 year old mother that has a 6 year old son. My ex-husband was abusive with me. So, I did everything in my power to get supervised visition. The court system said that i was trying to keep him from my son. All I was trying to do was protect him. Six months later my son came home with bruises and whelts all over his back side. He still could come see him because nobody saw him do it. But he has to go through me first. He hasn't seen him in 4 years. We couldn't be happier. My son is not afraid anymore. I still have nightmares of him trying to take him away from me. The only thing i could say to do is fight back. make sure that your lawyer will fight until you get what you want. PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN NO MATTER THE COST!!!!

Hi Marjorie, Your question is so relevent! I have full custody of my twin sons. One of my sons has ADHD, my other son does not. It's been three years since I divorced their father (a NPD posterchild). I moved 450 miles away from him, went back to work, bought a home, started our lives over. Within the last six months, he re-married a women who lives within 15 miles of where I live, built a new home for her, and he is now moving here and seeking to get custody of one of my sons. They DO NOT want to be with him or his new wife and her children. I have retained legal counsel and have filed an Order against him to stop the disparaging remarks and any conversation regarding their right to legally decide who they want to live with when they turn 12. He was also forced to see the same therapist that my children and I see, so the therapist could be my son's Advocate (court-wise). My former spouse, NPD, insisted that the therapist could not reveal (in court) the contents of any information presented during counceling sessions. But, when I do hear about things that concern me, I email my former spouse and ask him about it. Being that he is a NPD, and is always right, he emails me back to correct me. This information can, and will, be presented in court. In the meantime, he is determined to take just one of my sons with him because the other twin, who has ADHD does not fulfill his NS. It is somewhere beyond sad, but we just have to hang in there and go the distance with this difficult set of circumstances. Keep your heart and ears open for your children. Give them the opportunity to feel safe to talk to you about anything at all. Do not speak badly about your former spouse to them, but do get help for your children and yourself. Therapy has helped us a lot because sometimes their father says such horrible things about me my sons cry. They love me and will not tell me some of the things he says because they do not want to make me feel badly. However, they do confide these statements to the therapist (Court-Wise - disparging remarks). Their anger and resentment towards their father continues to grow. I too, wanted to give my children a chance to have a relationship with their father, but he is a narcissist, therefore, by default, he in incapable of having a relationship with anyone. Your children are going to need you to be stable, loving, consistent, epathetic, and extremely supportive while they weather the storm we (adults) have already begun struggled through. I hope this will help you and your children. Thank heavens they have you! I'm proud of you - hang in there!!

I always tried harder to please my husband, but when the children were of an age where he became jealous of my relation with them, he began to abuse them verbally, emotionally, physically....not consistently, but often enough to distress me...but not often enough to exit. That was my ignorance. By the time I smartened up and gained the confidence to make an exit, my children had experienced too much. I put my 10 year old into abuse counseling. He learned from professionals what was appropriate and what was threateningly inappropriate. He recognized the difference. My 16 year-old didn't want to go to counseling. I should have insisted. My youngest still loves his father, but he recognizes and protects himself. My older son, now 31 years old, continues to yearn for his father's approval... which will never come. Abuse counseling is healthy even for those who are not aware of any past abuse...as a protection against any future subtlety which might attempt an attack. I was too naive to recognize that at the time. Being informed and aware is the best defense against being lulled into danger...at any age. My tendency after the divorce was to use my husband's behavior as the best example of bad behavior my children could learn to avoid practicing. I chose to use other examples...pointing out results and asking them questions to involve them in other possible solutions. Denegrating their father beyond their own experience of his behavior would have only complicated an already, unfortunate situation. My older son is beginning to learn who he is, separate from his father's verbalized and subtle insults. He is learning this through his own choices, actions, recognized reactions and results as a father. I've noted that he incorporates positive motivation and active participation into his fatherhood. We spend a lot of time talking about the psychology of a child's reaction and formation of values based on a supportive environment with boundaries, consequences and consistent good examples from adults in his life.

Boys look up to their male role models as to how to treat woman NOT their mothers. It is called irresponsible parenting. They have already obtained most of the nurturing needed by puberty thru their mothers and turn to their fathers for instruction (how to be a man) while also remembering what they learned as a young child. Most will speculate that the mother in all cases did not discipline or spoiled the child, along with put up with her husbands abuse and this conclusion is barbaric/abusive in itself. This is not always true and affirms the abusive behavior that comes from a father who has no male femine side which can ONLY be obtained by father/male role models NOT a mother/woman. Woman are woman...they cannot and should not be placed in a position to imitate a man. The same goes for a man.

Yes, in some cases mothers will spoil their children (not teach them personal responsibility or to live in fantasy world). Is not teaching no self control as a father enough evidence? A mother who parents appropriately is beating her head against the wall under the ignored circumstances. This type of mother is forced to put her son out of her life for her own protection and that is enough proof to conclude there is no trusted institution except church(spiritual guidance). She now has to deal with a son who witnessed neglect as socially acceptable. He is seeking constant feed ~ enlisting people just as his abusive father instructed him to do. "If you love me, you have to lie" also in the way he speaks and acts towards her and allows/teaches his sons to emulate him. He is not raising his children as instructed by the Bible. The appearance of a woman forced to raise her children on her own, as many are incouraged to do, is in itself suggestive for the behavior to carry on. He is has created the illusion for the young man throughout his life woman are props and men do not have to take responsibility for their children, either by abandomant or making a choice not to change his inmature barbaric behavior. He will attempt to use his wife, hungry court environments and their related institutions, girlfriends, friends, relatives...you know the drill. When his mother walks away his girlfriend, wife, daughter is now "it" in this contimplated and sheltered game he plays(worshiping his father). Society gasps when a mother denies her son's company and again feeds into his lack of personal responsibility.

Can you see why society is helping this succeed? If various institutions are enabling this behavior there has to be something in it for them using both the victims and the abuser. I am merely trying to point out that it is greed. This type of man filters money into the pockets of any institution from prisons to therapists(Frued followers) ~ if not the sinner, then his family is lured into it. These institutions give the appearance of resolve while simultaneuously pampering their project(so-called narcissist)~President Clinton, for example, had and still has many people convinced he is a victim instead of taking personal responsibility and deeming himself unfit to lead a country(bad role model). Again this is society entertaining the destructive behavior like money in the bank boosting the economy and creating jobs mostly in the field of government and their programs that all operate on a secular basis.

Don't even try to protect your children from reality(creates fantasy). Abuse is real. If you do, you are instructing the child to think there is nothing wrong with their father's behavior. The courts excuse this as the scorned wife label and the old cover-up "anger issues" "letting him". Who cares what they think? Is that real? The children get enough of that everywhere they go-daddy is excused and then the kids. In the marriage or out of the marriage abuse is wrong...and marriage doesn't cause it people do. It's all about personal responsibility and only spiritually inept people would object.

_the similarities between Rural and urban lower courts are :

Two separate continents.

i ment for like a doubble bubble

they both have towns and cites

what was the river nile used for in ancient times

parts of it are green and parts are snowy...they are both beautiful places

North Korea focus on haing a strong military to become the most powerful and eat up all the other countries whereas South Korea believe that it is about being generous, having friendships with other countries and teamwork to be the most powerful.