answersLogoWhite

0

🧪

Scientists

This category is for questions about the people who apply the scientific method to solve problems, introduce new concepts, and strive to explain the natural world.

9,527 Questions

How did Guglielmo Marconi die?

Marconi died in Rome on 20 July 1937 at age 63 following a series of heart attacks, and Italy held a state funeral for him.

Why do scientists use the SI units?

It is much easier to convert between measurement units. E.g. 1cm x 1cm x 1cm is a volume of 1 milliliter and if filled with water has a mass of 1 gram. 10cm x 10cm x 10cm is a volume of 1 liter and if filled with water has a mass of 1 kilogram.

You don't have to remember that 231 cubic inches is a gallon and weighs 8.33 lbs if it's water.

Why did Nikola Tesla invent the Tesla coil?

Nikola Tesla invented the Tesla coil as part of his research into wireless energy transmission and electricity. He utilized the coil to experiment with high-frequency alternating current power transmission and wireless communication. The coil also played a key role in his demonstrations and experiments showcasing the potential of electricity and wireless technology.

What did Johannes Kepler discover about the universe?

The universe was really three-dimensional, and instead of thinking of circles, he should be thinking about spheres, with the planetary orbits being along the equators

What is bohr model of the atom?

The Bohr model of the atom is based on four fundamental postulates. Although he did not claim to explain or prove these postulates, Bohr found that by applying them, he could predict the properties of single-electron atoms and ions to an amazing degree of accuracy. Using the Bohr model, it is possible to accurately predict the energy levels of all one-electron atoms and ions, such as H, He+, Li2+ Be3+, B4+, C5+, etc.

The four key postulates of Bohr's theory are:

1) Atoms have well-defined electron orbits.

2) Atoms do not radiate.

3) Electrons travel in circular orbits with specific angular momenta, and only certain values are possible (angular momentum is quantized).

4) As electrons go from one orbit to the next, energy is either absorbed or released by the atom.

The quantized angular momentum can be written as:

I = n * (h/2*pi)

where I is the angular momentum, n is any integer, h is Planck's constant, and pi is the number pi, or 3.14159.

See Web Links and Related QuestionsSee the Related Questions and Web Links to the left for the answer. Overview of the Bohr ModelNiels Bohr proposed the Bohr Model of the Atom in 1915. Because the Bohr Model is a modification of the earlier Rutherford Model, some people call Bohr's Model the Rutherford-Bohr Model. The modern model of the atom is based on quantum mechanics. The Bohr Model contains some errors, but it is important because it describes most of the accepted features of atomic theory without all of the high-level math of the modern version. Unlike earlier models, the Bohr Model explains the Rydberg formula for the spectral emission lines of atomic hydrogen.

The Bohr Model is a planetary model in which the negatively-charged electrons orbit a small, positively-charged nucleus similar to the planets orbiting the Sun (except that the orbits are not planar). The gravitational force of the solar system is mathematically akin to the Coulomb (electrical) force between the positively-charged nucleus and the negatively-charged electrons.

Main Points of the Bohr Model
  • Electrons orbit the nucleus in orbits that have a set size and energy.
  • The energy of the orbit is related to its size. The lowest energy is found in the smallest orbit.
  • Radiation is absorbed or emitted when an electron moves from one orbit to another. Bohr Model of HydrogenThe simplest example of the Bohr Model is for the hydrogen atom (Z = 1) or for a hydrogen-like ion (Z > 1), in which a negatively-charged electron orbits a small positively-charged nucleus. Electromagnetic energy will be absorbed or emitted if an electron moves from one orbit to another. Only certain electron orbits are permitted. The radius of the possible orbits increases as n2, where n is the principal quantum number. The 3 → 2 transition produces the first line of the Balmer series. For hydrogen (Z = 1) this produces a photon having wavelength 656 nm (red light).
Problems with the Bohr Model
    • It violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle because it considers electrons to have both a known radius and orbit.
    • The Bohr Model provides an incorrect value for the ground state orbital angular momentum.
    • It makes poor predictions regarding the spectra of larger atoms.
    • It does not predict the relative intensities of spectral lines.
    • The Bohr Model does not explain fine structure and hyperfine structure in spectral lines.
    • It does not explain the Zeeman Effect.

What are the pros and cons of being a Marine Biologist What are they for being a Herpetologist?

A good thing on becoming a marine biologist is depending on how long you are in the field the more money you get. Also if you love water and science this would be a good career for you. You get to do what you love.

A bad thing on becoming a marine biologist is all the schooling you have to go through.

How did Antoine laurent lavoisier's parents die?

Jean-Antoine Lavoisier, a lawyer of some repute, and Emilie Punctis, whose family was influential and rich, were the parents of Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, the French "Father of Modern Chemistry", who was born in 1743. Emilie died when Lavoisier was 5 years old, and he was raised largely by his maiden aunt, Constance Punctis.

What happens if firefighting equipment is used improperly?

When untrained civilians use firefighting equipment improperly, it can result in serious problems, not the least of which is that the fire continues to grow. Some people attempt to use the wrong type of fire extinguisher on a flammable liquid fire, making it worse. Some people may attempt to use a hose reel without understanding the power of a hose nozzle, causing damage or injury.

Even professionally trained firefighters sometimes make mistakes.

There are too many risks to discuss in this post but just to name a few:

Throwing a ladder can be dangerous if the firefighter does not look for power lines first. Many firefighters have been killed by electrocution because they threw a ladder into power lines.

Saws and Cutting tools, as everyone know, can cause serious harm.

Car extrication tools can cause harm if the hand is near the cutting/spreading end.

If a Firefighter "clicks in" to his mask without turning the air on, they can suffocate.

These are just some of the problems firefighters face with the equipment they use. Unfortunately, firefighters get injured the most with the tools they use the most.

Where do scientists work?

one answer:

In laboratories or anywhere that has an open space, clean facility, sinks, and a big table to perform or observe experiments. Also, many scientists teach, so you will find them at universities.

another answer:

Depending on the field of science, you will find them anywhere...in jungles, deserts, snow country, under the sea, in the air, in space, or anywhere their curiosity takes them or humanity has needs for information.

When ordering supplies what unit of issue do you use?

You need to know in what demonination your required supplies are issued, ounces, pounds or tonnes. Then you determine how much you need and how long it has to last, and order accordingly.

How much is the salary of a animal scientist?

The salary of an animal scientist can vary depending on factors such as experience, education, location, and employer. On average, animal scientists in the United States make around $65,000 to $85,000 per year.

What is the major contribution of the scientist mean?

The major contribution of the scientist Norman Borlaug was his role in the Green Revolution, which helped to increase agricultural production worldwide and alleviate hunger in developing countries. His work in developing high-yielding wheat varieties led to significant advancements in food security and earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970.

Ten scientific attitude of a scientists?

The ten scientific attitudes are:

1) Humility

2) Open-mindedness

3) Intellectual Honesty

4) Resourcefulness

5) Rationality

6) Patience

7) Objectivity

8) Carefulness

9) Curiosity

10)Creativity

Why do scientists think about things?

So God doesn't have to!

ANSWER

it will be different for everyone,

but some because they have a curiosity that isn't satisfied by one or two answers

some because they don't believe the given answers

someone has to, if noone was at the top of the thinking for humanity and humans then what would happen?

basicaly we would go along, never discovering the new things that many scientists discover simply because they thought about it some more

humans have an insatiable thirst for knowledge, even with answers we still want to know more, we want all the details, especialy scientists.

lnowledge will always further and enrich our lives and scientists think aobut it do do this for all of us and for themselves.

f4

ANSWER:

It should first be noted that they don't just think about things, they think of stuff also. The main reason scientist think of things is to look busy. Scientist learned thousands of years ago that if they could appear to be thinking about things everybody would just leave them be and that's how they got out of doing chores around the house. They think about stuff because thinking about things gets old. Besides most of the things to think about have been thought up, and if a scientist wants to get published they have to come up with a truly original idea. So now they mostly think about stuff.

How do we test hypotheses?

by collecting data. Experimentation In our experiments we attempt to set up conditions so that we know that the outcome of the experiment is the result of the variable that we are manipulating. I hypothesize that a given substance will have a positive effect on plant growth. I will set up several experimental conditions, holding everything constant in each group except the substances given for growth. I observe the growth of the plant, and draw my conclusions. The hypothesis may hold, or it may need to be modified. For example, I notice that the substance that inspired the hypothesis may have caused growth that was too fast, leaving spindly and non-productive plants. I may want to continue the development of the substance, or perhaps find a way to blend it with other substances, and then continue the experimentation. _______________ Here is another example: I am investigating the properties of water, and I need to know all I can about how water, ice and heat interact. I know that when water gets cold enough, it freezes, and that when ice is exposed to heat, it melts. I might come up with a hypothesis-- a first attempt to understand what is happening with water and ice. I hypothesize: Since water is the liquid state of H2O, and liquids are warmer than their solid forms, water must be warmer than ice. It must be that as soon as water forms from melting ice, it is at least a little warmer than the ice. After all, at zero degrees water becomes ice. At this point, I do not know for sure, but I am speculating (hypothesizing) based on the general information that I have. I wonder how I can test my hypothesis: Let us assume that I can measure the temperature of ice and of water with great accuracy. I should be able to easily make a mixture of ice and water, while measuring the temperature of each independently.

  • If my hypothesis is correct, I will find that at one atmosphere of pressure and in a chamber kept at exactly zero degrees Celsius the ice will warm to zero degrees Celsius (if it starts out colder than that) and it will get no warmer. When it is warmer, it is water and not ice.
  • I will also observe that the water will be at least a little above zero degrees Celsius when it first melts away from the ice.
  • I apply heat to the ice and some ice melts.
To my surprise and annoyance, I find that the water is exactly zero degrees Celsius. We have a problem. My fellow engineers need an answer, and I've been hyping my hypothesis all over the place..... Eureka! I have found it! Keeping the chamber at zero degrees is the problem; as soon as the ice melts, the chamber air starts to cool the water, and it must also be cooling the thermometers, leading to an experimental error in the readings! I'll keep the chamber at 5 degrees Celsius.... I go back to the lab and I notice that my containers now all have a mix of ice and water, and the chamber is at exactly zero degrees Celsius. Not only that, all the ice is now at zero degrees Celsius, and so is the water! Exactly! Now I am just plain confused. I leave the chamber exactly as it is for several days and nothing changes. Everything in the chamber is verified to be at zero degrees Celsius, water is not in the process of freezing, and the ice is no longer melting. It just all stays in equilibrium. If my hypothesis had been correct, there would be no water in the chamber, because supposedly at zero degrees Celsius all water is ice, and "water is [so I hypothesized] always at least a little above zero degrees". My hypothesis has tanked; time for a new one. I wonder and wonder, and spend a few sleepless nights. Then I realize-- it has something to do with heat; it must. It has something to do with adding or with taking away heat... Hmmm. Testing a hypothesis is something like that. You wonder, and you explore. Hypotheses develop, and may become well-known theories when they seem to be able to withstand test after test designed to expose them false. When you think about it, how would you develop an experiment that exposes a hypothesis as true? They would be the very same tests, with results that support the hypothesis. Reality determines the outcome, not really the 'test'. A silly or inconsequential test will still show results in support of reality. But as mentioned above, even if all completed tests support a hypothesis, that is not to say that some unexpected approach will not be applied tomorrow.

Who are some famous scientists and what are their contributions to the field of science?

There are literally thousands of famous scientists who have all made very important contributions to the field of science.

All the winners of the Nobel Prize are, of course, extremely important scientists.

Here are a few examples:

  • Sigmund Freud (discovery of Integrated Trinity) - Germany, born in Czechoslovakia
  • Alfred Nobel (discovery of dynamite) - Sweden
  • Nikola Tesla (electricity field) - Slovenia
  • Albert Einstein (Theory of relativity) - Germany
  • Karl Jung (discovery of second personality of alcoholics = Alter/ego)
  • Gregor Mendel (discovery of genes)
  • Isaac Newton (Laws of Gravity)
  • William Perkin (chemist who invented the first synthetic dye, mauveine) - Britain
  • Herman Mark (The father of polymer chemistry) - Austrian Jew
  • Otto Bayer - German scientist who invented polyurethane. (He's not related to the Bayer family that started the chemical company he worked for.)
  • Otto Rohm and Otto Haas - German scientists who invented acrylate polymers. These are used for things like Plexiglas and the plastic layer of safety glass.
  • Leo Baekeland - Belgian scientist who invented two things: prepackaged photo paper; and phenolic plastic. The photo paper made him rich; the phenolic made him immortal.
  • Agapito Flores - Philippine inventor of the fluorescent lamp.
  • Fe Del Mundo - Philippine inventor of the incubator.
  • Eduardo San Juan - Philippine inventor of the lunar rover.

(For more information on the famous scientists of the world, see the list of Related Links, as well as the Related Questions.)

What would cause spitsputterbackfire and stall out on occasion on 1997 Pontiac Montana Please help?

Sounds like a timing issue. There is no way to advance or retard the timing in the newer models unfornately. Either the distributor\coil pack is going bad or you are getting bad sensor readings from a sensor, possibly the crankshaft position sensor. Is your MIL comming on? If it is then get the code read and start from there. Autozone will read then for free. I hope this helps you some.

How do administrative offices collect and furnish information?

Through the use of the TPS reports, of course! Oh, well, they may not call them TPS reports, but generally data is sent to administrative offices through the use of various reports and databases. In more modern situations, the use of networked computer monitoring equipment placed in the correct locations can feed more and more data automatically, eliminating some of the administrative portion of the jobs. An example would be automatic time keeping linked to the access badge. RFID chips in the various boxes, bar code scanners on the production line, automatic inspection devices and video recording devices are all examples.

Who is Annie Easley?

Annie Easley was an African American mathematician, computer scientist, and NASA rocket scientist. She worked at the Lewis Research Center (now Glenn Research Center) for over 30 years, where she contributed to the development of numerous technologies for space exploration, including energy conversion systems and alternative power sources. Easley overcame racial and gender barriers in the field of STEM and became a pioneer for women and minorities in the field of aerospace engineering.