Ethics and Morality

stewardship

totality

double effect

cooperation

solidarity

In an adversarial system, judges are responsible for ensuring that the treatment of parties is just and fair by ensuring due process, impartiality, and adherence to legal principles. They are tasked with overseeing the proceedings, ruling on motions, and ensuring that both parties have a fair opportunity to present their cases.

An unethical person is someone who acts in ways that are dishonest, unprincipled, or morally wrong. This could include behaviors like lying, cheating, stealing, or intentionally harming others for personal gain.

Yes, deontology is a moral theory that places emphasis on the intent behind one's actions rather than the consequences. It asserts that the moral rightness of an action is determined by adherence to rules or duties, rather than the outcomes of those actions.

Natural Law is a deontological ethical theory, as it focuses on the moral duty to follow principles that are inherently good and universal, rather than on the consequences of actions (teleological approach).

No – it is merely a generally effective way to get people to do what you want. People who are terrified give in to demands easily, and as such terrorism has been around for a long, long time. But that doesn't mean it is inevitable.

It appears to be primarily focused on personal character and responses to situations, therefore similar to situation ethics. take the familiar example of finding a large amount of money in an untoward or chance position- there are all sorts of qualifying angles here. for example if I was browsing along in a book store in the shelves and happened to find a large denomination bill in a book ( this can happen easily as people often store money in books)- I would quietly pick it up and put it in my back pocket and quietly leave the store. that modulus would nor work on the street! if one found a wallet or somethiing ( dedicated_ with ID cards or address one would be obligated to report the incident to the police- perhaps taking the found items to the police station. I once had a wallet incident happen- the owner was nearby- was a woman who had motored up- from the south and the wallet slipped out of her pants pocket- as I found it near her car. naturally she was glad to get it back. One the other hand in the bookstore example- I would take the money, put it aside and quietly (Clear the Bridge). it is a sad commentary on society that so much of situation ethics is predicated on the dollar sign. anyhow that is my take.

Typically it is used to prevent critical discussion concerning barbaric customs practiced in different parts of the world because they might offend people's sensibilities. For example, female genital mutilation is permissible because in African culture they prize this.

Cultural Relativism is actually a problem. While it may be impossible to know exactly which moral positions are the best, it is clear that certain moral positions are better than others. Killing the victims of rape is not a good way to treat women, even if such an act is praticed in over twenty countries. Beating people who disagree with your political or religious views is not a good way to treat others, even if such an act is practiced in dozens of countries. The values enshrined in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights should be enforced for all people in all places regardless of the problems with normative culture.

According to cultural relativism, the morally right action is determined by the norms and values of a particular culture or society. It suggests that there is no universal standard of morality, and what is considered right or wrong can vary between different cultures.

Social causes of Ill health Health is affected by the social conditions in which people live and work. Poor social conditions and poverty increase the risks of ill health and disease. The social causes include poor sanitation, nutritional deficiencies, violence and accidents, poor water supply, little or no access to health services, lack of safety at work, overcrowded or poorly maintained housing, insufficient or poor quality food, environmental pollution, bad sanitation, stress, lack of exercise due to working, and travelling patterns etc. Many causes of diseases and ill health are related to the social conditions of our lives because everything, including health, is dependent of social conditions we live in. If the social conditions are not good, then both physical and mental heath get badly affected. Proper understanding of these causes can help care for your health in a better way.

Asian 54%

East Asian 24% (Korea, Mongolia ,China, Japan)

South Asian 21% (India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal)

Southeast Asian 9% (Cambodia, Bruma, Philippines, Malayasia)

Black 15%

White 15%

Hispanic 8%

Middle Eastern 8%

those figures are wrong as those in positions don t wish the truth to be out there so they count all persons in canada and the us as caucasians, you certainly know that to be false, the truth is the most populace is asian decent, blacks are next in number and more than double the minority caucasian race the smallest of the group. the other races are only mixture of those races

__

Canada doesn't count all people as Caucasian. The census reports are quite specific in breaking down the country's demographics.

and neither the us. but those who publish population of the world records falsifies those tabulations and considers canada and us predominantly white and therefore all are white for their propaganda

Approximately 1% of the world's population is estimated to have heterochromia, a condition characterized by having different colored eyes. This can either be genetic or acquired later in life due to injury or disease.

A moral issue can be described as an issue that involves a difference of belief or principle and not a matter of preference. What is moral also changes from society to society hence the difficulty at determining what is universally moral.

A concept of proper behavior that reflects the values of a particular social or political context. Distinguished from a moral understanding which is authoritative across space and time.

Much of our standard for "moral behavior" is based on ancient medical ignorance. Take the moral issue of marital fidelity (being a virgin before and staying with one partner after marriage), in ancient times people didn't know about bacteria and viruses. They thought that the horrible affictions, STDs, people who had many pertners suffered were the "wrath of God". Of course now we know differently, but many people still believe that it is morally wrong to "cheat" on one's partner, when perhaps it is only wrong because it may hurt them.

The second level of Kohlberg's Three Levels of Moral Reasoning
Acceptance of society's conventions considering or regarding right and wrong; At this level the individual obeys rules and follows society's norms even when there are not consequences for obedience or disobedience. (McDevitt & Ormrod 2007)

The common good is beneficial to everyone or most everyone.

The common good is better for society because it is beneficial to everyone whereas individual rights only suites the user of the rights. In fact , even the founders of this country even thought that common good was more important because for example: If there were a bunch of people in the movie theater, and one person randomly yelled, "FIRE!," or "HES GOT A GUN!"that would be for the individual rights, not the common good and also would cause major panic. It is not good for everyone because maybe a man who heard that person yell "FIRE"(or the gun) spilled their drink while getting up trying to escape and tripped on an ice cube, fracturing his spine or breaking other bones. This would end up in court and the guy who yelled fire would be guilty because he technically put everyone in the theater in an unsafe situation. Its those who may abuse their rights who defiantly do not see why that in most cases especially this one, the common good will win over.

A professional code of ethics outlines the standards of behavior and conduct expected of individuals within a specific profession. Its purpose is to promote ethical behavior, integrity, and accountability among professionals, and to protect the welfare of clients, patients, or the public.

The last name Buck is of Old English origin and is classified as a topographic surname, which means it likely referred to someone who lived near a prominent beech tree or beech wood. It can also be a nickname for a person who displayed characteristics associated with a male deer, such as swiftness or strength.

The root word for "emo" is "emotion." The term "emo" is derived from the word "emotional," and is used to describe a genre of music and a subculture known for expressing deep emotions and sensitivity.

Prescriptive discourse is any discourse that promotes what should be thought, spoken, or done. For example, the sentence 'That window is open' normally expresses a certain descriptive thought (proposition, statement), namely, that that window is open. By way of contrast, the sentence "You should open that window" would normally be used to tell someone what to do, to prescribe a certain action. So prescriptive discourse is normative discourse. It is discourse about what ought to be the case rather than descriptive discourse about what is the case.

Political factors that influence the development of a code of ethics may include government regulations, political ideologies, lobbying efforts by interest groups, and the influence of political stakeholders. These factors can shape the values, principles, and standards included in the code of ethics to align with prevailing political interests and agendas.

Bribery in professional ethics refers to the act of offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value in exchange for influencing the actions of an individual in a position of authority. It undermines the integrity of the professional relationship and can lead to ethical violations, conflicts of interest, and legal consequences. Professionals are expected to uphold high ethical standards by refraining from engaging in bribery.

Implementing diversity training for staff, promoting a culture of inclusivity and respect, fostering opportunities for intergenerational activities, and actively addressing any discriminatory behavior or attitudes will help reduce the likelihood of discrimination in an elderly care home setting. Creating policies that promote equality, providing resources for cultural competence, and involving residents in decision-making processes can also contribute to a more inclusive environment.